From: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
To: <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>, <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
<richard@nod.at>
Cc: <marek.vasut@gmail.com>, <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <tmaimon77@gmail.com>,
<bbrezillon@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mtd: spi-nor: Move m25p80 code in spi-nor.c
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 18:01:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cdc6268d-16c7-82ad-53e0-9ec9352d0400@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50066b1c-6c4c-4aa7-c03d-1d2876afa2c2@microchip.com>
On 05/08/19 5:21 PM, Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com wrote:
>
>
> On 08/05/2019 02:10 PM, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>> External E-Mail
>>
>>
>>
>> On 05/08/19 3:55 PM, Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/01/2019 07:22 PM, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>>>> index e02376e1127b..866962c715b4 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>>>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>>>
>
>>>>
>>>> @@ -688,6 +1003,16 @@ static int spi_nor_erase_sector(struct spi_nor *nor, u32 addr)
>>>> if (nor->erase)
>>>> return nor->erase(nor, addr);
>>>>
>>>> + if (nor->spimem) {
>>>> + struct spi_mem_op op =
>>>> + SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(nor->erase_opcode, 1),
>>>> + SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(nor->addr_width, addr, 1),
>>>> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY,
>>>> + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DATA);
>>>> +
>>>> + return spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>
>>> this should be done below in the function, after masking the address.
>>
>> Nope. It would have been true if addr been sent as part of op.data.buf.out.
>> But since addr is being send as part of op.addr.val, spi-mem.c takes care of this for spi_transfer(s)
>>
>
> Is this valid also for the controllers that implement the ctlr->mem_ops?
Nope, address conversion logic is not required if ctlr->mem_ops is
implemented. spi-mem drivers should be able to handle address field as
is and there is no need to be converted to SPI bus order.
Regards
Vignesh
>
>>>
>>> You add a double space after return in:
>>>> + return nor->read_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_RDSR2, sr2, 1);
>>>
>>
>> Ah, Will fix
>>
>>> There are some checkpatch warnings that we can fix now.
>>>
>>
>> I did see warnings like:
>>>
>>> WARNING: line over 80 characters
>>> #1023: FILE: drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c:2554:
>>> + SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(SPI_NOR_MAX_ID_LEN, id, 1));
>>
>> I think its okay to overshoot 80 char limit for better readability.
>
> ok
>
>> Let me know if you think otherwise>
>>> ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
>>> #1270: FILE: drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c:4846:
>>> + {"mx25l25635e"},{"mx66l51235l"},
>>> ^
>>
>> This and similar warnings can be fixed, but will throw off alignment wrt previous lines.
>> Therefore I let them be as is.
>
> ok
>
> Cheers,ta
>
--
Regards
Vignesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-05 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-01 16:22 [PATCH v4 0/3] Merge m25p80 into spi-nor Vignesh Raghavendra
2019-08-01 16:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mtd: spi-nor: always use bounce buffer for register read/writes Vignesh Raghavendra
2019-08-05 9:06 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-08-05 10:38 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2019-08-05 11:24 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-08-01 16:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mtd: spi-nor: Move m25p80 code in spi-nor.c Vignesh Raghavendra
2019-08-05 10:25 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-08-05 11:10 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2019-08-05 11:51 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-08-05 12:31 ` Vignesh Raghavendra [this message]
2019-08-01 16:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mtd: spi-nor: Rework hwcaps selection for the spi-mem case Vignesh Raghavendra
2019-08-05 17:45 ` Tudor.Ambarus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cdc6268d-16c7-82ad-53e0-9ec9352d0400@ti.com \
--to=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tmaimon77@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).