linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] perf util: Move block_pair_cmp to block-info
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 19:52:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce3758ac-e00b-ffa0-847e-010b359884e5@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200131083223.GF3841@kernel.org>



On 1/31/2020 4:32 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 08:55:53PM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
>> block_pair_cmp() is a function which is used to compare
>> two blocks. Moving it from builtin-diff.c to block-info.c
>> to let it can be used by other builtins.
>>
>>   v4/v5:
>>   ------
>>   No change.
>>
>>   v3:
>>   ---
>>   Separate it from original patch for good tracking.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/perf/builtin-diff.c    | 17 -----------------
>>   tools/perf/util/block-info.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>   tools/perf/util/block-info.h |  2 ++
>>   3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
>> index f8b6ae557d8b..5ff1e21082cb 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
>> @@ -572,23 +572,6 @@ static void init_block_hist(struct block_hist *bh)
>>   	bh->valid = true;
>>   }
>>   
>> -static int block_pair_cmp(struct hist_entry *a, struct hist_entry *b)
>> -{
>> -	struct block_info *bi_a = a->block_info;
>> -	struct block_info *bi_b = b->block_info;
>> -	int cmp;
>> -
>> -	if (!bi_a->sym || !bi_b->sym)
>> -		return -1;
>> -
>> -	cmp = strcmp(bi_a->sym->name, bi_b->sym->name);
>> -
>> -	if ((!cmp) && (bi_a->start == bi_b->start) && (bi_a->end == bi_b->end))
>> -		return 0;
>> -
>> -	return -1;
>> -}
>> -
>>   static struct hist_entry *get_block_pair(struct hist_entry *he,
>>   					 struct hists *hists_pair)
>>   {
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/block-info.c b/tools/perf/util/block-info.c
>> index c4b030bf6ec2..f0f38bdd496a 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/block-info.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/block-info.c
>> @@ -475,3 +475,20 @@ float block_info__total_cycles_percent(struct hist_entry *he)
>>   
>>   	return 0.0;
>>   }
>> +
>> +int block_pair_cmp(struct hist_entry *a, struct hist_entry *b)
> 
> First thing that came to mind was that hist_entry comparision functions
> had been changed to return int64_t recently, when I went to look at it I
> found this:
> 
> tools/perf/util/block-info.c
> 
> int64_t block_info__cmp(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt __maybe_unused,
>                          struct hist_entry *left, struct hist_entry *right)
> {
>          struct block_info *bi_l = left->block_info;
>          struct block_info *bi_r = right->block_info;
>          int cmp;
> .
> .
> .
> 
> Which look a bit more complete, can you check if that can be used
> instead or explain why my quick analysis of this is b0rken?
> 
> Perhaps we can have a __block_info__cmp() that doesn't receive the
> perf_hpp_fmt (that isn't even used above) so that the previous use of
> block_pair_cmp() can be replaced with __block_info__cmp() instead?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - Arnaldo
> 

Hi Arnaldo,

I think it's a good idea to use __block_info__cmp() to replace the 
block_pair_cmp(). The block_info__cmp() is more comprehensive than 
block_pair_cmp() and we only need a bit change such as,

--- a/tools/perf/util/block-info.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/block-info.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ int64_t block_info__cmp(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt 
__maybe_unused,

         if (!bi_l->sym || !bi_r->sym) {
                 if (!bi_l->sym && !bi_r->sym)
-                       return 0;
+                       return -1;
                 else if (!bi_l->sym)
                         return -1;
                 else

It returns -1 if both syms are NULL.

I will update the patchset.

Thanks
Jin Yao

>> +{
>> +	struct block_info *bi_a = a->block_info;
>> +	struct block_info *bi_b = b->block_info;
>> +	int cmp;
>> +
>> +	if (!bi_a->sym || !bi_b->sym)
>> +		return -1;
>> +
>> +	cmp = strcmp(bi_a->sym->name, bi_b->sym->name);
>> +
>> +	if ((!cmp) && (bi_a->start == bi_b->start) && (bi_a->end == bi_b->end))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	return -1;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/block-info.h b/tools/perf/util/block-info.h
>> index bef0d75e9819..4fa91eeae92e 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/block-info.h
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/block-info.h
>> @@ -76,4 +76,6 @@ int report__browse_block_hists(struct block_hist *bh, float min_percent,
>>   
>>   float block_info__total_cycles_percent(struct hist_entry *he);
>>   
>> +int block_pair_cmp(struct hist_entry *a, struct hist_entry *b);
>> +
>>   #endif /* __PERF_BLOCK_H */
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-31 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-28 12:55 [PATCH v5 0/4] perf: Refactor the block info implementation Jin Yao
2020-01-28 12:55 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] perf util: Move block_pair_cmp to block-info Jin Yao
2020-01-31  8:32   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-01-31 11:52     ` Jin, Yao [this message]
2020-01-28 12:55 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] perf util: Validate map/dso/sym before comparing blocks Jin Yao
2020-01-28 12:55 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] perf util: Flexible to set block info output formats Jin Yao
2020-01-28 12:55 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] perf util: Support color ops to print block percents in color Jin Yao
2020-01-30 16:02 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] perf: Refactor the block info implementation Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ce3758ac-e00b-ffa0-847e-010b359884e5@linux.intel.com \
    --to=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).