From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803B3C00449 for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 15:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D4B2087D for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 15:25:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 33D4B2087D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728361AbeJGWdD (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Oct 2018 18:33:03 -0400 Received: from mailout.easymail.ca ([64.68.200.34]:57066 "EHLO mailout.easymail.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726448AbeJGWdD (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Oct 2018 18:33:03 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout.easymail.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156FE4138A; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 15:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout.easymail.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (emo03-pco.easydns.vpn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4D7SEQOjqYMl; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 15:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.87] (c-24-9-64-241.hsd1.co.comcast.net [24.9.64.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout.easymail.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F065F40EFB; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 15:25:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses To: Geert Uytterhoeven , James Bottomley Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Shuah Khan References: <1538861738.4088.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1538861799.4088.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com> From: Shuah Khan Message-ID: Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 09:25:11 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi James, Thanks for the patch. On 10/07/2018 02:25 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi James, > > Thanks for your patch! > > On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 11:36 PM James Bottomley > wrote: >> From 4a614e9440148894207bef5bf69e74071baceb3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: James Bottomley >> Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 14:21:56 -0700 >> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email >> addresses >> >> The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing > > that > >> private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour. Since >> the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch >> process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by >> the project to correct this ambiguity. >> >> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley > > Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.") > > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > Acked-by: Shuah Khan >> --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst >> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include: >> * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks >> * Public or private harassment >> * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic >> - address, without explicit permission >> + address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit permission >> * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a >> professional setting > thanks, -- Shuah