From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422763AbWA1Aya (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2006 19:54:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422764AbWA1Aya (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2006 19:54:30 -0500 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.198]:12984 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422763AbWA1Aya convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2006 19:54:30 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=N7sU80iixxjpwTn7QY5yhdC58jZNVw5kXMNKx/dYSXG6TG+drRRccMCiqREUMFeGbmPslN0LGlBcbhJGpD1m2XiVBTCwIsJsybuFe0eQSuQ6jENjq3Merq4UMwaUmiLXhsylWL3Xuf1ubuBmZnbaenK9J07+hN49hHvxu8Hm0BM= Message-ID: Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 02:54:29 +0200 From: Hai Zaar To: "Antonino A. Daplas" Subject: Re: vesa fb is slow on 2.6.15.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <43DABCF6.4000904@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <43D8E1EE.3040302@gmail.com> <43D94764.3040303@gmail.com> <43D9B77E.6080003@gmail.com> <43DA5681.2020305@gmail.com> <43DABCF6.4000904@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/28/06, Antonino A. Daplas wrote: > Hai Zaar wrote: > >> Looks harmless to me. > >> > >> Can you check /proc/iomem just to verify if that particular address has > >> been reserved by the OS. > > Relevant iomem entries are: > > f0000000-f7ffffff : PCI Bus #40 > > f0000000-f7ffffff : 0000:40:00.0 > > f0000000-f7ffffff : vesafb > > f8000000-f9ffffff : PCI Bus #40 > > f8000000-f8ffffff : 0000:40:00.0 > > f9000000-f9ffffff : 0000:40:00.0 > > After I load nvidia.ko, it changes to: > > f0000000-f7ffffff : PCI Bus #40 > > f0000000-f7ffffff : 0000:40:00.0 > > f0000000-f7ffffff : vesafb > > f8000000-f9ffffff : PCI Bus #40 > > f8000000-f8ffffff : 0000:40:00.0 > ^^^^^^^^ > Yes, this address range (16M) is already allocated to resource #0 > of the nvidia card. So trying to allocate resource #6 on the same > address looks bogus to me. Ok. What now? I've rebooted without 'vga' and 'video' parameters at all - the error stays. BTW: How do you know that its allocated to resource #0 - are resource numbers written somewhere in /proc/iomem and I've missed it? > Tony > -- Zaar