From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C49BC04EB8 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 01:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DC720834 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 01:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nvidia.com header.i=@nvidia.com header.b="LR8LIybN" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C1DC720834 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726702AbeLEBFi (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2018 20:05:38 -0500 Received: from hqemgate15.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.64]:19093 "EHLO hqemgate15.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725979AbeLEBFi (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2018 20:05:38 -0500 Received: from hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqemgate15.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA) id ; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 17:05:34 -0800 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6]) by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service); Tue, 04 Dec 2018 17:05:37 -0800 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com on Tue, 04 Dec 2018 17:05:37 -0800 Received: from [10.110.48.28] (10.124.1.5) by HQMAIL101.nvidia.com (172.20.187.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 01:05:37 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] put_user_page*(): start converting the call sites To: David Laight , "'john.hubbard@gmail.com'" , Andrew Morton , "linux-mm@kvack.org" CC: Jan Kara , Tom Talpey , Al Viro , Christian Benvenuti , Christoph Hellwig , Christopher Lameter , Dan Williams , Dennis Dalessandro , Doug Ledford , Jason Gunthorpe , Jerome Glisse , Matthew Wilcox , Michal Hocko , Mike Marciniszyn , Ralph Campbell , LKML , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" References: <20181204001720.26138-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> From: John Hubbard X-Nvconfidentiality: public Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 17:05:36 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [10.124.1.5] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL108.nvidia.com (172.18.146.13) To HQMAIL101.nvidia.com (172.20.187.10) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US-large Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1543971934; bh=+r+7FKGjKDkL8pa6jmZv04z58r1rXWiJI/ilZa/ZAQ8=; h=X-PGP-Universal:Subject:To:CC:References:From:X-Nvconfidentiality: Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP:X-ClientProxiedBy:Content-Type:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=LR8LIybNvNdXE4e2Y53L/XPiqTyr+AlckoIhwuxnMbyUk6RmTO2+KZRnWJzqgwmd5 oV0Qx9kj0b/dqmWVtcNfFfmcFErNXm1KziIgL5FU6kJdvkSSrqn4S5GAII7Pc3dxMC ZY7SXjm90wbVQ+TK7YBxLOkimnjFi5vtMgIM2XGo+nZL8ZUbU3CXaOLHygLfUSw4B+ KlH9jb0pnsdq3gKHkkwEQexmw9ptN5UwPQLdHxI7yd126e9KsBLsETj/48bNOKQfsj EVEKeU5P1VThtlETYkWONHlgGTxcxd7hl6257RXrICrkH5H9jK6g06QmKXc9FBcy9Q kFKmwMMAK0Qrg== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/4/18 9:10 AM, David Laight wrote: > From: john.hubbard@gmail.com >> Sent: 04 December 2018 00:17 >> >> Summary: I'd like these two patches to go into the next convenient cycle. >> I *think* that means 4.21. >> >> Details >> >> At the Linux Plumbers Conference, we talked about this approach [1], and >> the primary lingering concern was over performance. Tom Talpey helped me >> through a much more accurate run of the fio performance test, and now >> it's looking like an under 1% performance cost, to add and remove pages >> from the LRU (this is only paid when dealing with get_user_pages) [2]. So >> we should be fine to start converting call sites. >> >> This patchset gets the conversion started. Both patches already had a fair >> amount of review. > > Shouldn't the commit message contain actual details of the change? > Hi David, This "patch 0000" is not a commit message, as it never shows up in git log. Each of the follow-up patches does have details about the changes it makes. But maybe you are really asking for more background information, which I should have added in this cover letter. Here's a start: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20181110085041.10071-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com ...and it looks like this small patch series is not going to work out--I'm going to have to fall back to another RFC spin. So I'll be sure to include you and everyone on that. Hope that helps. thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA