[PATCH V3 00/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: improve interaction with cpufreq core

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Javi Merino <javi.merino@kernel.org>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
	Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
	Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com>,
	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH V3 00/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: improve interaction with cpufreq core
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:58:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1492579345.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)

Hi Guys,

The cpu_cooling driver is designed to use CPU frequency scaling to avoid
high thermal states for a platform. But it wasn't glued really well with
cpufreq core. For example clipped-cpus is copied from the policy
structure and its much better to use the policy->cpus (or related_cpus)
fields directly as they may have got updated. Not that things were
broken before this series, but they can be optimized a bit more.

This series tries to improve interactions between cpufreq core and
cpu_cooling driver and does some fixes/cleanups to the cpu_cooling
driver.

I have tested it on ARM 32 (exynos) and 64 bit (hikey) boards and have
pushed them for 0-day build bot and kernel CI testing as well. We should
know if something is broken with these.

@Lukasz: It would be good if you can give them a test, specially because
of your work on the "power" specific bits in the driver. This series
already has the improvements you suggested.

Pushed here as well:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm.git thermal/cooling

V2->V3:
- Additional check to guarantee that policy is valid.
- Initialize freq-table and cpufreq_cdev->policy fields before they are
  used by the power-cooling functionality.
- Thanks Lukasz for testing out and suggesting these changes.

V1->V2:
- Name cpufreq cooling dev as cpufreq_cdev everywhere (Eduardo).

--
viresh

Viresh Kumar (17):
  thermal: cpu_cooling: Avoid accessing potentially freed structures
  thermal: cpu_cooling: rearrange globals
  thermal: cpu_cooling: Name cpufreq cooling devices as cpufreq_cdev
  thermal: cpu_cooling: replace cool_dev with cdev
  thermal: cpu_cooling: remove cpufreq_cooling_get_level()
  thermal: cpu_cooling: get rid of a variable in cpufreq_set_cur_state()
  thermal: cpu_cooling: use cpufreq_policy to register cooling device
  cpufreq: create cpufreq_table_count_valid_entries()
  thermal: cpu_cooling: store cpufreq policy
  thermal: cpu_cooling: OPPs are registered for all CPUs
  thermal: cpu_cooling: get rid of 'allowed_cpus'
  thermal: cpu_cooling: merge frequency and power tables
  thermal: cpu_cooling: create structure for idle time stats
  thermal: cpu_cooling: get_level() can't fail
  thermal: cpu_cooling: don't store cpu_dev in cpufreq_cdev
  thermal: cpu_cooling: 'freq' can't be zero in cpufreq_state2power()
  thermal: cpu_cooling: Rearrange struct cpufreq_cooling_device

 drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c                   |   2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c                       |   2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c                    |  13 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c                   |   2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c                   |   4 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/qoriq-cpufreq.c                    |   3 +-
 drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c                      | 602 +++++++++------------
 drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c                      |  22 +-
 drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c |  22 +-
 include/linux/cpu_cooling.h                        |  32 +-
 include/linux/cpufreq.h                            |  14 +
 11 files changed, 311 insertions(+), 407 deletions(-)

-- 
2.12.0.432.g71c3a4f4ba37