From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1914CC2D0D2 for ; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 00:05:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E104920679 for ; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 00:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=generalsoftwareinc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@generalsoftwareinc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="n53a0lqW" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726559AbfLYAFl (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Dec 2019 19:05:41 -0500 Received: from mail-vs1-f67.google.com ([209.85.217.67]:46878 "EHLO mail-vs1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726332AbfLYAFl (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Dec 2019 19:05:41 -0500 Received: by mail-vs1-f67.google.com with SMTP id t12so13220484vso.13 for ; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 16:05:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=generalsoftwareinc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition :user-agent; bh=VoiVMNxBQvkfO1nvNSopmJtlI9rIbMWEjc866MTLsUs=; b=n53a0lqWXWUrQ9CyzbCgTQwXri/c2KLf+C0UBuz8DIvfEUYiASuNPLh+ZboSVat/AR NLrpn4tBhLegdcSi9ww+K4JtykUViGV9rror4jM3ebb/aNgYe22HhUlBex8aWPEA3Szs dffdcgr4cCBs+CWlygzExTJdmOxOh9YnRBqTpcimVeDcMhMac5iqRX/nJn18XVuwq1oD u/6ZdUS+ptW1HeYbYyvGdEpbSp+9UBR0qVhzHf+P9c95TmRF4nrWBIw3CS+8o7bT1Ok0 CWjPunukg5BNKE35kuYyb6sk4aWMhsjtBuOuZ9ecB5pEIJXJIsX3DLlpUH+F+OMS2AkI i0aA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=VoiVMNxBQvkfO1nvNSopmJtlI9rIbMWEjc866MTLsUs=; b=e+TvqXBtVNBxDfSZNMmy9QukIsydFrX0qPLiMKz4OrXWZdjCoAa6ySUakt/wRTpbuh NHbAhMDL+TEbGFnSNpuxYEmcIyS5wfUzW0kutfMV9bVgac7+ZKCYa+O6uc5TrQBZ3537 TxAUuruMpHnIZWbtV5e92qwGdhAcE082NpgVoz7rBoorcgOoLQDckRzuYmCV64xqS4it G+biYKOK8awFEEdkWffWimwTLyJfvcZ/SqOGkFuQvo/xEwtPCYN5uRU99IGYthOdVDI2 jfft3MNx4uNia1lhh74hPHRguu5oHF66DoglznQmKeFmTaoJEbzCz3Btqi3c2S/4rFgq XiGA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWGZoI8/1LA3ik5w+dGnBONHxOuSaAo9BJuMij+hKDnIlF2nER0 EX1cncf+Eg1vSTPbUoRzEkcFew== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwg806JSSurK1S8eEWGtL7gSPIeBdfl/yNW5wfO5kvd0+HrNpx1BtnoSYOwjmSbe8G38F+iLw== X-Received: by 2002:a67:ea87:: with SMTP id f7mr20585272vso.52.1577232339823; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 16:05:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from frank-laptop ([172.97.41.74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s6sm4503431vsl.31.2019.12.24.16.05.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 24 Dec 2019 16:05:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 19:05:38 -0500 From: "Frank A. Cancio Bello" To: Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: joel@joelfernandes.org, saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org, nachukannan@gmail.com, rdunlap@infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] docs: ftrace: Fix minor issues in the doc Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I didn't want to be pushy with these minor fixes but occur to me now that, even all seem to be clear in the latest version of the RFC (v2) related to these fixes, a clean patchset could be expected after such RFC. So here we go: Clarifies the RAM footprint of buffer_size_kb without getting into implementation details. Fix typos and a small notation mistakes in the doc. Changes since v2: - Sorry, I'm sending this v3 with no changes but the subject of the emails because I forgot to tag the last batch as v2. You can ignore the previous versions of this patchset. I'm still getting used to the versioning of the patches and all that, my apologies. Changes since v1: - Improves the redaction as per Randy suggestion. Changes since RFC v2: - Take out the notation mistake into its own commit because it is not a typo. Changes since RFC v1: - Removes implementation description of the RAM footprint of buffer_size_kb, but still make the corresponded clarification. - Removes a patch that was just for illustration purposes because Steven already got the issue that I was referring to. - Adds a patch to fix other typos in the doc. Frank A. Cancio Bello (3): docs: ftrace: Clarify the RAM impact of buffer_size_kb docs: ftrace: Fix typos docs: ftrace: Fix small notation mistake Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst | 9 +++++---- Documentation/trace/ring-buffer-design.txt | 2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1