From: Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>,
"Subbaraman Narayanamurthy" <subbaram@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Guru Das Srinagesh" <gurus@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH v6 0/2] Convert period and duty cycle to u64
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:22:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1581706694.git.gurus@codeaurora.org> (raw)
Reworked the change pushed upstream earlier [1] so as to not add an extension
to an obsolete API. With this change, pwm_ops->apply() can be used to set
pwm_state parameters as usual.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190916140048.GB7488@ulmo/
Changes from v1:
- Fixed compilation errors seen when compiling for different archs.
Changes from v2:
- Fixed %u -> %llu in a dev_dbg in pwm-stm32-lp.c, thanks to kbuild test robot
- Added a couple of fixes to pwm-imx-tpm.c and pwm-sifive.c
Changes from v3:
- Rebased to current tip of for-next.
Changes from v4:
- Split the patch into two: one for changes to the drivers, and the actual
switch to u64 for ease of reverting should the need arise.
- Re-examined the patch and made the following corrections:
* intel_panel.c:
DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP -> DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL (as only the numerator would be
64-bit in this case).
* pwm-sti.c:
do_div -> div_u64 (do_div is optimized only for x86 architectures, and
div_u64's comment block suggests to use this as much as possible).
Changes from v5:
- Dropped the conversion of struct pwm_capture to u64 for reasons mentioned
in https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pwm/msg11541.html.
Guru Das Srinagesh (2):
pwm: Convert drivers to use 64-bit period and duty cycle
pwm: core: Convert period and duty cycle to u64
drivers/clk/clk-pwm.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c | 2 +-
drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c | 2 +-
drivers/media/rc/ir-rx51.c | 3 ++-
drivers/pwm/core.c | 4 ++--
drivers/pwm/pwm-clps711x.c | 2 +-
drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c | 2 +-
drivers/pwm/pwm-imx27.c | 5 ++---
drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c | 2 +-
drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c | 5 +++--
drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c | 2 +-
drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 2 +-
drivers/pwm/sysfs.c | 8 ++++----
drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 3 ++-
include/linux/pwm.h | 12 ++++++------
15 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next reply other threads:[~2020-02-14 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-14 19:22 Guru Das Srinagesh [this message]
2020-02-14 19:22 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] pwm: Convert drivers to use 64-bit period and duty cycle Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-02-14 19:22 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] pwm: core: Convert period and duty cycle to u64 Guru Das Srinagesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1581706694.git.gurus@codeaurora.org \
--to=gurus@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=subbaram@codeaurora.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=uwe@kleine-koenig.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).