linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin98@gmail.com>
To: nsaenz@kernel.org
Cc: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin98@gmail.com>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, stefan.wahren@i2se.com,
	dan.carpenter@oracle.com, phil@raspberrypi.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/5] vchiq: Patch to separate platform and cdev code
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 21:50:48 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1626882325.git.ojaswin98@gmail.com> (raw)

Hello,

This patchset adderesses the TODO item number 10 specified at:

    drivers/staging/vc04-services/interface/TODO

For reference, the task is:

    10) Reorganize file structure: Move char driver to it's own file and join
    both platform files

    The cdev is defined alongside with the platform code in vchiq_arm.c. It
    would be nice to completely decouple it from the actual core code. For
    instance to be able to use bcm2835-audio without having /dev/vchiq created.
    One could argue it's better for security reasons or general cleanliness. It
    could even be interesting to create two different kernel modules, something
    the likes of vchiq-core.ko and vchiq-dev.ko. This would also ease the
    upstreaming process.

A summary of the patches is as follows:

- Patch 1: Move cdev init code into a function
- Patch 2: Shift some devlarations from vchiq_arm.c to vchiq_arm.h for
           sharing
- Patch 3: Move vchiq cdev init code from vchiq_arm.c into vchiq_dev.c
- Patch 4: Decouple cdev code by defining a Kconfig entry to allow
           optional compilation of it.
- Patch 5: Merge code in vchiq_2835_arm.c to vchiq_arm.c

Changes since v3 [2]:

* In Patch 5, replace forward declarations of some of the functions with
  function definition 

Changes since v2 [1]:

* In Patch 1, as suggested, I have added error handling code back to
  ensure the driver exits when there is an error in creating vchiq cdev
  
* I have built this patch against the right kernel (gregkh/staging,
  staging-next branch) to avoid introducing any unwanted inconsistencies
  like whitespace changes

I have tested the patch using vchiq_test utility on RPi 3B+.

Regards,
Ojaswin

[1] v2: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1449117/
[2] v3: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1453915/

Ojaswin Mujoo (5):
  staging: vchiq: Refactor vchiq cdev code
  staging: vchiq: Move certain declarations to vchiq_arm.h
  staging: vchiq: Move vchiq char driver to its own file
  staging: vchiq: Make creation of vchiq cdev optional
  staging: vchiq: Combine vchiq platform code into single file

 drivers/staging/vc04_services/Kconfig         |   10 +
 drivers/staging/vc04_services/Makefile        |    5 +-
 .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm.c      |  564 ----
 .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c           | 2330 +++++------------
 .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.h           |   82 +
 .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c           | 1440 ++++++++++
 6 files changed, 2251 insertions(+), 2180 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c

-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-07-21 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-21 16:20 Ojaswin Mujoo [this message]
2021-07-21 16:20 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] staging: vchiq: Refactor vchiq cdev code Ojaswin Mujoo
2021-07-21 16:20 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] staging: vchiq: Move certain declarations to vchiq_arm.h Ojaswin Mujoo
2021-07-21 16:20 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] staging: vchiq: Move vchiq char driver to its own file Ojaswin Mujoo
2021-07-21 16:20 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] staging: vchiq: Make creation of vchiq cdev optional Ojaswin Mujoo
2021-07-27 13:25   ` Greg KH
2021-07-27 16:55     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2021-07-21 16:20 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] staging: vchiq: Combine vchiq platform code into single file Ojaswin Mujoo
2021-07-23 11:02 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] vchiq: Patch to separate platform and cdev code Greg KH
2021-07-23 12:59   ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2021-07-23 13:31     ` Stefan Wahren
2021-07-24 10:44       ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2021-07-24  9:38 ` Stefan Wahren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1626882325.git.ojaswin98@gmail.com \
    --to=ojaswin98@gmail.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
    --cc=phil@raspberrypi.com \
    --cc=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).