linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v4 0/8] Fix long standing AER Error Handling Issues
@ 2021-10-05 17:18 Naveen Naidu
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] PCI/AER: Remove ID from aer_agent_string[] Naveen Naidu
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Naveen Naidu @ 2021-10-05 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, ruscur, oohall
  Cc: Naveen Naidu, linux-kernel-mentees, skhan, linux-kernel,
	linux-pci, linuxppc-dev

This patch series aims at fixing some of the AER error handling issues
we have.

Currently we have the following issues:
 - Confusing message in aer_print_error()
 - aer_err_info not being initialized completely in DPC path before
   we print the AER logs
 - A bug [1] in clearing of AER registers in the native AER path

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20151229155822.GA17321@localhost/

The primary aim of this patch series is to converge the APEI path and the
native AER error handling paths. In our current code, we find that we
have two different behaviours (especially when it comes to clearing of
the AER registers) for the same functionality.

This patch series, tries to bring the same semantics and hence more
commonanlity between the APEI part of code and the native OS
handling of AER errors.

PATCH 1:
  - Fixes the first issue

PATCH 2 - 4:
  - Fixes the second issue
  - "Patch 3/8" is dependent on "Patch 2/8" in the series

PATCH 5 - 7
  - Deals with converging the various paths and brings more
    commonality between them
  - "Patch 6/8" depends on "Patch 1/8"

PATCH 8:
  -  Adds extra information in AER error logs.

Thanks,
Naveen Naidu

Changelog
=========

v4:
  - Implement review comments
  - Make "Patch 1/8" commit message more meaningful
  - Fix the code comment error detected by kernel test robot 
    in "Patch 6/8"

v2 and v3:
  - Fix up mail formatting and include the appropriate receipients for
    the patch.

Naveen Naidu (8):
 [PATCH v4 1/8] PCI/AER: Remove ID from aer_agent_string[]
 [PATCH v4 2/8] PCI: Cleanup struct aer_err_info
 [PATCH v4 3/8] PCI/DPC: Initialize info->id in dpc_process_error()
 [PATCH v4 4/8] PCI/DPC: Use pci_aer_clear_status() in dpc_process_error()
 [PATCH v4 5/8] PCI/DPC: Converge EDR and DPC Path of clearing AER registers
 [PATCH v4 6/8] PCI/AER: Clear error device AER registers in aer_irq()
 [PATCH v4 7/8] PCI/ERR: Remove redundant clearing of AER register in pcie_do_recovery()
 [PATCH v4 8/8] PCI/AER: Include DEVCTL in aer_print_error()

 drivers/pci/pci.h      |  23 +++-
 drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 269 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c |   9 +-
 drivers/pci/pcie/err.c |   9 +-
 4 files changed, 209 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 1/8] PCI/AER: Remove ID from aer_agent_string[]
  2021-10-05 17:18 [PATCH v4 0/8] Fix long standing AER Error Handling Issues Naveen Naidu
@ 2021-10-05 17:18 ` Naveen Naidu
  2021-10-21  1:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] PCI: Cleanup struct aer_err_info Naveen Naidu
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Naveen Naidu @ 2021-10-05 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, ruscur, oohall
  Cc: Naveen Naidu, linux-kernel-mentees, skhan, linux-kernel,
	linux-pci, linuxppc-dev

Currently, we do not print the "id" field in the AER error logs. Yet the
aer_agent_string[] has the word "id" in it. The AER error log looks
like:

  pcieport 0000:00:03.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Data Link Layer, (Receiver ID)

Without the "id" field in the error log, The aer_agent_string[]
(eg: "Receiver ID") does not make sense. A user reading the
aer_agent_string[] in the log, might inadvertently look for an "id"
field and not finding it might lead to confusion.

Remove the "ID" from the aer_agent_string[].

The following are sample dummy errors inject via aer-inject.

Before
=======

In 010caed4ccb6 ("PCI/AER: Decode Error Source Requester ID"),
the "id" field was removed from the AER error logs, so currently AER
logs look like:

  pcieport 0000:00:03.0: AER: Corrected error received: 0000:00:03:0
  pcieport 0000:00:03.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Data Link Layer, (Receiver ID) <--- no id field
  pcieport 0000:00:03.0:   device [1b36:000c] error status/mask=00000040/0000e000
  pcieport 0000:00:03.0:    [ 6] BadTLP

After
======

  pcieport 0000:00:03.0: AER: Corrected error received: 0000:00:03.0
  pcieport 0000:00:03.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Data Link Layer, (Receiver)
  pcieport 0000:00:03.0:   device [1b36:000c] error status/mask=00000040/0000e000
  pcieport 0000:00:03.0:    [ 6] BadTLP

Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
index 9784fdcf3006..241ff361b43c 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
@@ -516,10 +516,10 @@ static const char *aer_uncorrectable_error_string[] = {
 };
 
 static const char *aer_agent_string[] = {
-	"Receiver ID",
-	"Requester ID",
-	"Completer ID",
-	"Transmitter ID"
+	"Receiver",
+	"Requester",
+	"Completer",
+	"Transmitter"
 };
 
 #define aer_stats_dev_attr(name, stats_array, strings_array,		\
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ void aer_print_error(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info)
 	const char *level;
 
 	if (!info->status) {
-		pci_err(dev, "PCIe Bus Error: severity=%s, type=Inaccessible, (Unregistered Agent ID)\n",
+		pci_err(dev, "PCIe Bus Error: severity=%s, type=Inaccessible, (Unregistered Agent)\n",
 			aer_error_severity_string[info->severity]);
 		goto out;
 	}
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 2/8] PCI: Cleanup struct aer_err_info
  2021-10-05 17:18 [PATCH v4 0/8] Fix long standing AER Error Handling Issues Naveen Naidu
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] PCI/AER: Remove ID from aer_agent_string[] Naveen Naidu
@ 2021-10-05 17:18 ` Naveen Naidu
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] PCI/DPC: Initialize info->id in dpc_process_error() Naveen Naidu
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Naveen Naidu @ 2021-10-05 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, ruscur, oohall
  Cc: Naveen Naidu, linux-kernel-mentees, skhan, linux-kernel,
	linux-pci, linuxppc-dev

The id, status and the mask fields of the struct aer_err_info comes
directly from the registers, hence their sizes should be explicit.

The length of these registers are:
  - id: 16 bits - Represents the Error Source Requester ID
  - status: 32 bits - COR/UNCOR Error Status
  - mask: 32 bits - COR/UNCOR Error Mask

Since the length of the above registers are even, use u16 and u32
to represent their values.

Also remove the __pad fields.

"pahole" was run on the modified struct aer_err_info and the size
remains unchanged.

Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pci.h | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
index 1cce56c2aea0..9be7a966fda7 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
@@ -427,18 +427,16 @@ struct aer_err_info {
 	struct pci_dev *dev[AER_MAX_MULTI_ERR_DEVICES];
 	int error_dev_num;
 
-	unsigned int id:16;
+	u16	id;
 
 	unsigned int severity:2;	/* 0:NONFATAL | 1:FATAL | 2:COR */
-	unsigned int __pad1:5;
 	unsigned int multi_error_valid:1;
 
 	unsigned int first_error:5;
-	unsigned int __pad2:2;
 	unsigned int tlp_header_valid:1;
 
-	unsigned int status;		/* COR/UNCOR Error Status */
-	unsigned int mask;		/* COR/UNCOR Error Mask */
+	u32 status;		/* COR/UNCOR Error Status */
+	u32 mask;		/* COR/UNCOR Error Mask */
 	struct aer_header_log_regs tlp;	/* TLP Header */
 };
 
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 3/8] PCI/DPC: Initialize info->id in dpc_process_error()
  2021-10-05 17:18 [PATCH v4 0/8] Fix long standing AER Error Handling Issues Naveen Naidu
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] PCI/AER: Remove ID from aer_agent_string[] Naveen Naidu
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] PCI: Cleanup struct aer_err_info Naveen Naidu
@ 2021-10-05 17:18 ` Naveen Naidu
  2021-10-21  1:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] PCI/DPC: Use pci_aer_clear_status() " Naveen Naidu
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Naveen Naidu @ 2021-10-05 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, ruscur, oohall
  Cc: Naveen Naidu, linux-kernel-mentees, skhan, linux-kernel,
	linux-pci, linuxppc-dev

In the dpc_process_error() path, info->id isn't initialized before being
passed to aer_print_error(). In the corresponding AER path, it is
initialized in aer_isr_one_error().

The error message shown during Coverity Scan is:

  Coverity #1461602
  CID 1461602 (#1 of 1): Uninitialized scalar variable (UNINIT)
  8. uninit_use_in_call: Using uninitialized value info.id when calling aer_print_error.

Initialize the "info->id" before passing it to aer_print_error()

Fixes: 8aefa9b0d910 ("PCI/DPC: Print AER status in DPC event handling")
Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
index c556e7beafe3..df3f3a10f8bc 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
@@ -262,14 +262,14 @@ static int dpc_get_aer_uncorrect_severity(struct pci_dev *dev,
 
 void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
-	u16 cap = pdev->dpc_cap, status, source, reason, ext_reason;
+	u16 cap = pdev->dpc_cap, status, reason, ext_reason;
 	struct aer_err_info info;
 
 	pci_read_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS, &status);
-	pci_read_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_SOURCE_ID, &source);
+	pci_read_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_SOURCE_ID, &info.id);
 
 	pci_info(pdev, "containment event, status:%#06x source:%#06x\n",
-		 status, source);
+		 status, info.id);
 
 	reason = (status & PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER_RSN) >> 1;
 	ext_reason = (status & PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER_RSN_EXT) >> 5;
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 4/8] PCI/DPC: Use pci_aer_clear_status() in dpc_process_error()
  2021-10-05 17:18 [PATCH v4 0/8] Fix long standing AER Error Handling Issues Naveen Naidu
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] PCI/DPC: Initialize info->id in dpc_process_error() Naveen Naidu
@ 2021-10-05 17:18 ` Naveen Naidu
  2021-10-21  1:40   ` Bjorn Helgaas
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] PCI/DPC: Converge EDR and DPC Path of clearing AER registers Naveen Naidu
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Naveen Naidu @ 2021-10-05 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, ruscur, oohall
  Cc: Naveen Naidu, linux-kernel-mentees, skhan, linux-kernel,
	linux-pci, linuxppc-dev

dpc_process_error() clears both AER fatal and non fatal status
registers. Instead of clearing each status registers via a different
function call use pci_aer_clear_status().

This helps clean up the code a bit.

Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
index df3f3a10f8bc..faf4a1e77fab 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
@@ -288,8 +288,7 @@ void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 		 dpc_get_aer_uncorrect_severity(pdev, &info) &&
 		 aer_get_device_error_info(pdev, &info)) {
 		aer_print_error(pdev, &info);
-		pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(pdev);
-		pci_aer_clear_fatal_status(pdev);
+		pci_aer_clear_status(pdev);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 5/8] PCI/DPC: Converge EDR and DPC Path of clearing AER registers
  2021-10-05 17:18 [PATCH v4 0/8] Fix long standing AER Error Handling Issues Naveen Naidu
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] PCI/DPC: Use pci_aer_clear_status() " Naveen Naidu
@ 2021-10-05 17:18 ` Naveen Naidu
  2021-10-21  2:09   ` Bjorn Helgaas
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] PCI/AER: Clear error device AER registers in aer_irq() Naveen Naidu
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Naveen Naidu @ 2021-10-05 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, ruscur, oohall
  Cc: Naveen Naidu, linux-kernel-mentees, skhan, linux-kernel,
	linux-pci, linuxppc-dev

In the EDR path, AER registers are cleared *after* DPC error event is
processed. The process stack in EDR is:

  edr_handle_event()
    dpc_process_error()
    pci_aer_raw_clear_status()
    pcie_do_recovery()

But in DPC path, AER status registers are cleared *while* processing
the error. The process stack in DPC is:

  dpc_handler()
    dpc_process_error()
      pci_aer_clear_status()
    pcie_do_recovery()

In EDR path, AER status registers are cleared irrespective of whether
the error was an RP PIO or unmasked uncorrectable error. But in DPC, the
AER status registers are cleared only when it's an unmasked uncorrectable
error.

This leads to two different behaviours for the same task (handling of
DPC errors) in FFS systems and when native OS has control.

Bring the same semantics for clearing the AER status register in EDR
path and DPC path.

Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
index faf4a1e77fab..68899a3db126 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
@@ -288,7 +288,6 @@ void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 		 dpc_get_aer_uncorrect_severity(pdev, &info) &&
 		 aer_get_device_error_info(pdev, &info)) {
 		aer_print_error(pdev, &info);
-		pci_aer_clear_status(pdev);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -297,6 +296,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dpc_handler(int irq, void *context)
 	struct pci_dev *pdev = context;
 
 	dpc_process_error(pdev);
+	pci_aer_clear_status(pdev);
 
 	/* We configure DPC so it only triggers on ERR_FATAL */
 	pcie_do_recovery(pdev, pci_channel_io_frozen, dpc_reset_link);
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 6/8] PCI/AER: Clear error device AER registers in aer_irq()
  2021-10-05 17:18 [PATCH v4 0/8] Fix long standing AER Error Handling Issues Naveen Naidu
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] PCI/DPC: Converge EDR and DPC Path of clearing AER registers Naveen Naidu
@ 2021-10-05 17:18 ` Naveen Naidu
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] PCI/ERR: Remove redundant clearing of AER register in pcie_do_recovery() Naveen Naidu
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] PCI/AER: Include DEVCTL in aer_print_error() Naveen Naidu
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Naveen Naidu @ 2021-10-05 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, ruscur, oohall
  Cc: Naveen Naidu, linux-kernel-mentees, skhan, linux-kernel,
	linux-pci, linuxppc-dev

Converge the APEI path and native AER path of clearing the AER registers
of the error device.

In APEI path, the system firmware clears the AER registers before
handing off the record to OS. But in "native AER" path, the execution
path of clearing the AER register is as follows:

  aer_isr_one_error
    aer_print_port_info
      if (find_source_device())
        aer_process_err_devices
          handle_error_source
            pci_write_config_dword(dev, PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS, ...)

The above path has a bug, if the find_source_device() fails, AER
registers are not cleared from the error device. This means, the error
device will keep reporting the error again and again and would lead
to message spew.

Related Bug Report:
  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20151229155822.GA17321@localhost/
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1521173

The above bug could be avoided, if the AER registers are cleared during
the AER IRQ handler aer_irq(), which would provide guarantee that the AER
error registers are always cleared. This is similar to how APEI handles
these errors.

The main aim is that:

  When an interrupt handler deals with a interrupt, it must *always*
  clear the source of the interrupt.

Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pci.h      |  13 ++-
 drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 249 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
index 9be7a966fda7..eb88d8bfeaf7 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
@@ -424,7 +424,6 @@ static inline bool pci_dev_is_added(const struct pci_dev *dev)
 #define AER_MAX_MULTI_ERR_DEVICES	5	/* Not likely to have more */
 
 struct aer_err_info {
-	struct pci_dev *dev[AER_MAX_MULTI_ERR_DEVICES];
 	int error_dev_num;
 
 	u16	id;
@@ -440,6 +439,18 @@ struct aer_err_info {
 	struct aer_header_log_regs tlp;	/* TLP Header */
 };
 
+/* Preliminary AER error information processed from Root port */
+struct aer_devices_err_info {
+	struct pci_dev *dev[AER_MAX_MULTI_ERR_DEVICES];
+	struct aer_err_info err_info;
+};
+
+/* AER information associated with each error device */
+struct aer_dev_err_info {
+	struct pci_dev *dev;
+	struct aer_err_info err_info;
+};
+
 int aer_get_device_error_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info);
 void aer_print_error(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info);
 #endif	/* CONFIG_PCIEAER */
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
index 241ff361b43c..d3937f5384e4 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
@@ -36,6 +36,18 @@
 
 #define AER_ERROR_SOURCES_MAX		128
 
+/*
+ * There can be 128 maximum error sources (AER_ERROR_SOURCES_MAX) and each
+ * error source can have maximum of 5 error devices (AER_MAX_MULTI_ERR_DEVICES)
+ * so the maximum error devices we can report is:
+ *
+ * AER_ERROR_DEVICES_MAX = AER_ERROR_SOURCES_MAX * AER_MAX_MULTI_ERR_DEVICES == (128 * 5) == 640
+ *
+ * But since, the size in KFIFO should be a power of two, the closest value
+ * to 640 is 1024
+ */
+# define AER_ERROR_DEVICES_MAX		1024
+
 #define AER_MAX_TYPEOF_COR_ERRS		16	/* as per PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS */
 #define AER_MAX_TYPEOF_UNCOR_ERRS	27	/* as per PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS*/
 
@@ -46,7 +58,7 @@ struct aer_err_source {
 
 struct aer_rpc {
 	struct pci_dev *rpd;		/* Root Port device */
-	DECLARE_KFIFO(aer_fifo, struct aer_err_source, AER_ERROR_SOURCES_MAX);
+	DECLARE_KFIFO(aer_fifo, struct aer_dev_err_info, AER_ERROR_DEVICES_MAX);
 };
 
 /* AER stats for the device */
@@ -803,14 +815,14 @@ void cper_print_aer(struct pci_dev *dev, int aer_severity,
 
 /**
  * add_error_device - list device to be handled
- * @e_info: pointer to error info
+ * @e_dev: pointer to error info
  * @dev: pointer to pci_dev to be added
  */
-static int add_error_device(struct aer_err_info *e_info, struct pci_dev *dev)
+static int add_error_device(struct aer_devices_err_info *e_dev, struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
-	if (e_info->error_dev_num < AER_MAX_MULTI_ERR_DEVICES) {
-		e_info->dev[e_info->error_dev_num] = pci_dev_get(dev);
-		e_info->error_dev_num++;
+	if (e_dev->err_info.error_dev_num < AER_MAX_MULTI_ERR_DEVICES) {
+		e_dev->dev[e_dev->err_info.error_dev_num] = pci_dev_get(dev);
+		e_dev->err_info.error_dev_num++;
 		return 0;
 	}
 	return -ENOSPC;
@@ -877,18 +889,18 @@ static bool is_error_source(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *e_info)
 
 static int find_device_iter(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
 {
-	struct aer_err_info *e_info = (struct aer_err_info *)data;
+	struct aer_devices_err_info *e_dev = (struct aer_devices_err_info *)data;
 
-	if (is_error_source(dev, e_info)) {
+	if (is_error_source(dev, &e_dev->err_info)) {
 		/* List this device */
-		if (add_error_device(e_info, dev)) {
+		if (add_error_device(e_dev, dev)) {
 			/* We cannot handle more... Stop iteration */
 			/* TODO: Should print error message here? */
 			return 1;
 		}
 
 		/* If there is only a single error, stop iteration */
-		if (!e_info->multi_error_valid)
+		if (!e_dev->err_info.multi_error_valid)
 			return 1;
 	}
 	return 0;
@@ -897,7 +909,7 @@ static int find_device_iter(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
 /**
  * find_source_device - search through device hierarchy for source device
  * @parent: pointer to Root Port pci_dev data structure
- * @e_info: including detailed error information such like id
+ * @e_dev: including detailed error information such like id
  *
  * Return true if found.
  *
@@ -907,26 +919,26 @@ static int find_device_iter(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
  * e_info->error_dev_num and e_info->dev[], based on the given information.
  */
 static bool find_source_device(struct pci_dev *parent,
-		struct aer_err_info *e_info)
+		struct aer_devices_err_info *e_dev)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *dev = parent;
 	int result;
 
 	/* Must reset in this function */
-	e_info->error_dev_num = 0;
+	e_dev->err_info.error_dev_num = 0;
 
 	/* Is Root Port an agent that sends error message? */
-	result = find_device_iter(dev, e_info);
+	result = find_device_iter(dev, e_dev);
 	if (result)
 		return true;
 
 	if (pci_pcie_type(parent) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC)
-		pcie_walk_rcec(parent, find_device_iter, e_info);
+		pcie_walk_rcec(parent, find_device_iter, e_dev);
 	else
-		pci_walk_bus(parent->subordinate, find_device_iter, e_info);
+		pci_walk_bus(parent->subordinate, find_device_iter, e_dev);
 
-	if (!e_info->error_dev_num) {
-		pci_info(parent, "can't find device of ID%04x\n", e_info->id);
+	if (!e_dev->err_info.error_dev_num) {
+		pci_info(parent, "can't find device of ID%04x\n", e_dev->err_info.id);
 		return false;
 	}
 	return true;
@@ -940,24 +952,42 @@ static bool find_source_device(struct pci_dev *parent,
  * Invoked when an error being detected by Root Port.
  */
 static void handle_error_source(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Correctable error does not need software intervention.
+	 * No need to go through error recovery process.
+	 */
+	if (info->severity == AER_NONFATAL)
+		pcie_do_recovery(dev, pci_channel_io_normal, aer_root_reset);
+	else if (info->severity == AER_FATAL)
+		pcie_do_recovery(dev, pci_channel_io_frozen, aer_root_reset);
+	pci_dev_put(dev);
+}
+
+/**
+ * clear_error_source_aer_registers - clear AER registers of the error source device
+ * @dev: pointer to pci_dev data structure of error source device
+ * @info: comprehensive error information
+ *
+ * Invoked when an error being detected by Root Port but before we handle the
+ * error.
+ */
+static void clear_error_source_aer_registers(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info info)
 {
 	int aer = dev->aer_cap;
 
-	if (info->severity == AER_CORRECTABLE) {
-		/*
-		 * Correctable error does not need software intervention.
-		 * No need to go through error recovery process.
-		 */
+	if (info.severity == AER_CORRECTABLE) {
 		if (aer)
 			pci_write_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS,
-					info->status);
+					info.status);
 		if (pcie_aer_is_native(dev))
 			pcie_clear_device_status(dev);
-	} else if (info->severity == AER_NONFATAL)
-		pcie_do_recovery(dev, pci_channel_io_normal, aer_root_reset);
-	else if (info->severity == AER_FATAL)
-		pcie_do_recovery(dev, pci_channel_io_frozen, aer_root_reset);
-	pci_dev_put(dev);
+	} else if (info.severity == AER_NONFATAL) {
+		pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(dev);
+	} else if (info.severity == AER_FATAL) {
+		pci_aer_clear_fatal_status(dev);
+	}
+
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER
@@ -1093,70 +1123,112 @@ int aer_get_device_error_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info)
 	return 1;
 }
 
-static inline void aer_process_err_devices(struct aer_err_info *e_info)
-{
-	int i;
-
-	/* Report all before handle them, not to lost records by reset etc. */
-	for (i = 0; i < e_info->error_dev_num && e_info->dev[i]; i++) {
-		if (aer_get_device_error_info(e_info->dev[i], e_info))
-			aer_print_error(e_info->dev[i], e_info);
-	}
-	for (i = 0; i < e_info->error_dev_num && e_info->dev[i]; i++) {
-		if (aer_get_device_error_info(e_info->dev[i], e_info))
-			handle_error_source(e_info->dev[i], e_info);
-	}
-}
-
 /**
- * aer_isr_one_error - consume an error detected by root port
- * @rpc: pointer to the root port which holds an error
+ * aer_find_corr_error_source_device - find the error source which detected the corrected error
+ * @rp: pointer to Root Port pci_dev data structure
  * @e_src: pointer to an error source
+ * @e_info: including detailed error information such like id
+ *
+ * Return true if found.
+ *
+ * Process the error information received at the Root Port, set these values
+ * in the aer_devices_err_info and find all the devices that are related to
+ * the error.
  */
-static void aer_isr_one_error(struct aer_rpc *rpc,
-		struct aer_err_source *e_src)
+static bool aer_find_corr_error_source_device(struct pci_dev *rp,
+					struct aer_err_source *e_src,
+					struct aer_devices_err_info *e_info)
 {
-	struct pci_dev *pdev = rpc->rpd;
-	struct aer_err_info e_info;
-
-	pci_rootport_aer_stats_incr(pdev, e_src);
-
-	/*
-	 * There is a possibility that both correctable error and
-	 * uncorrectable error being logged. Report correctable error first.
-	 */
 	if (e_src->status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_COR_RCV) {
-		e_info.id = ERR_COR_ID(e_src->id);
-		e_info.severity = AER_CORRECTABLE;
+		e_info->err_info.id = ERR_COR_ID(e_src->id);
+		e_info->err_info.severity = AER_CORRECTABLE;
 
 		if (e_src->status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_MULTI_COR_RCV)
-			e_info.multi_error_valid = 1;
+			e_info->err_info.multi_error_valid = 1;
 		else
-			e_info.multi_error_valid = 0;
-		aer_print_port_info(pdev, &e_info);
+			e_info->err_info.multi_error_valid = 0;
 
-		if (find_source_device(pdev, &e_info))
-			aer_process_err_devices(&e_info);
+		if (!find_source_device(rp, e_info))
+			return false;
 	}
+	return true;
+}
 
+/**
+ * aer_find_uncorr_error_source_device - find the error source which detected the uncorrected error
+ * @rp: pointer to Root Port pci_dev data structure
+ * @e_src: pointer to an error source
+ * @e_info: including detailed error information such like id
+ *
+ * Return true if found.
+ *
+ * Process the error information received at the Root Port, set these values
+ * in the aer_devices_err_info and find all the devices that are related to
+ * the error.
+ */
+static bool aer_find_uncorr_error_source_device(struct pci_dev *rp,
+					struct aer_err_source *e_src,
+					struct aer_devices_err_info *e_info)
+{
 	if (e_src->status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_UNCOR_RCV) {
-		e_info.id = ERR_UNCOR_ID(e_src->id);
+		e_info->err_info.id = ERR_UNCOR_ID(e_src->id);
 
 		if (e_src->status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_FATAL_RCV)
-			e_info.severity = AER_FATAL;
+			e_info->err_info.severity = AER_FATAL;
 		else
-			e_info.severity = AER_NONFATAL;
+			e_info->err_info.severity = AER_NONFATAL;
 
 		if (e_src->status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_MULTI_UNCOR_RCV)
-			e_info.multi_error_valid = 1;
+			e_info->err_info.multi_error_valid = 1;
 		else
-			e_info.multi_error_valid = 0;
+			e_info->err_info.multi_error_valid = 0;
+
+		if (!find_source_device(rp, e_info))
+			return false;
+	}
 
-		aer_print_port_info(pdev, &e_info);
+	return true;
+}
 
-		if (find_source_device(pdev, &e_info))
-			aer_process_err_devices(&e_info);
+/**
+ * aer_isr_one_error - consume an error detected by root port
+ * @rp: pointer to Root Port pci_dev data structure
+ * @e_dev: pointer to an error device
+ */
+static void aer_isr_one_error(struct pci_dev *rp, struct aer_dev_err_info *e_dev)
+{
+	aer_print_port_info(rp, &e_dev->err_info);
+	aer_print_error(e_dev->dev, &e_dev->err_info);
+	handle_error_source(e_dev->dev, &e_dev->err_info);
+}
+
+static bool aer_add_err_devices_to_queue(struct aer_rpc *rpc,
+		struct aer_devices_err_info *e_info)
+{
+	int i;
+	struct aer_dev_err_info *e_dev;
+
+	e_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*e_dev), GFP_ATOMIC);
+	if (!e_dev)
+		return false;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < e_info->err_info.error_dev_num && e_info->dev[i]; i++) {
+		e_dev->err_info = e_info->err_info;
+		e_dev->dev = e_info->dev[i];
+
+		/*
+		 * Store the AER register information for each error device on
+		 * the queue
+		 */
+		if (aer_get_device_error_info(e_dev->dev, &e_dev->err_info)) {
+			if (!kfifo_put(&rpc->aer_fifo, *e_dev))
+				return false;
+
+			clear_error_source_aer_registers(e_dev->dev, e_dev->err_info);
+		}
 	}
+
+	return true;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1170,13 +1242,13 @@ static irqreturn_t aer_isr(int irq, void *context)
 {
 	struct pcie_device *dev = (struct pcie_device *)context;
 	struct aer_rpc *rpc = get_service_data(dev);
-	struct aer_err_source e_src;
+	struct aer_dev_err_info e_dev;
 
 	if (kfifo_is_empty(&rpc->aer_fifo))
 		return IRQ_NONE;
 
-	while (kfifo_get(&rpc->aer_fifo, &e_src))
-		aer_isr_one_error(rpc, &e_src);
+	while (kfifo_get(&rpc->aer_fifo, &e_dev))
+		aer_isr_one_error(rpc->rpd, &e_dev);
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
@@ -1194,6 +1266,11 @@ static irqreturn_t aer_irq(int irq, void *context)
 	struct pci_dev *rp = rpc->rpd;
 	int aer = rp->aer_cap;
 	struct aer_err_source e_src = {};
+	struct aer_devices_err_info *e_info;
+
+	e_info = kzalloc(sizeof(*e_info), GFP_ATOMIC);
+	if (!e_info)
+		return IRQ_NONE;
 
 	pci_read_config_dword(rp, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, &e_src.status);
 	if (!(e_src.status & (PCI_ERR_ROOT_UNCOR_RCV|PCI_ERR_ROOT_COR_RCV)))
@@ -1202,8 +1279,26 @@ static irqreturn_t aer_irq(int irq, void *context)
 	pci_read_config_dword(rp, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_ERR_SRC, &e_src.id);
 	pci_write_config_dword(rp, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, e_src.status);
 
-	if (!kfifo_put(&rpc->aer_fifo, e_src))
-		return IRQ_HANDLED;
+	pci_rootport_aer_stats_incr(rp, &e_src);
+
+	/*
+	 * There is a possibility that both correctable error and
+	 * uncorrectable error are being logged. Find the devices which caused
+	 * correctable errors first so that they can be added to the queue first
+	 * and will be reported first.
+	 *
+	 * Before adding the error device to the queue to be handled, clear the
+	 * AER status registers.
+	 */
+	if (aer_find_corr_error_source_device(rp, &e_src, e_info)) {
+		if (!aer_add_err_devices_to_queue(rpc, e_info))
+			return IRQ_NONE;
+	}
+
+	if (aer_find_uncorr_error_source_device(rp, &e_src, e_info)) {
+		if (!aer_add_err_devices_to_queue(rpc, e_info))
+			return IRQ_NONE;
+	}
 
 	return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
 }
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 7/8] PCI/ERR: Remove redundant clearing of AER register in pcie_do_recovery()
  2021-10-05 17:18 [PATCH v4 0/8] Fix long standing AER Error Handling Issues Naveen Naidu
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] PCI/AER: Clear error device AER registers in aer_irq() Naveen Naidu
@ 2021-10-05 17:18 ` Naveen Naidu
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] PCI/AER: Include DEVCTL in aer_print_error() Naveen Naidu
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Naveen Naidu @ 2021-10-05 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, ruscur, oohall
  Cc: Naveen Naidu, linux-kernel-mentees, skhan, linux-kernel,
	linux-pci, linuxppc-dev

pcie_do_recovery() is shared across the following paths:
 - ACPI APEI
 - Native AER path
 - EDR
 - DPC

ACPI APEI
==========

  ghes_handle_aer()
    aer_recover_queue()
      kfifo_in_spinlocked(aer_recover_ring)

  aer_recover_work_func()
    while (kfifo_get(aer_recover_ring))
      pcie_do_recovery()

In this path the system firmware clears the AER registers before
handing off the record to the OS in ghes_handle_aer()

Native AER
==========

 aer_irq()
   aer_add_err_devices_to_queue()
     kfifo_put(&rpc->aer_fifo, *e_dev)
     clear_error_source_aer_registers()   <---- AER registers are cleard

 aer_isr()
   aer_isr_one_error()
    handle_error_source()
      pcie_do_recovery()

The AER registers are cleared during the handling of IRQ, i.e before we
the recovery starts.

DPC
=====

  dpc_handler()
    dpc_process_error()
    pci_aer_clear_status()       <---- AER registers are cleared
    pcie_do_recovery()

EDR
====

  edr_handle_event()
    dpc_process_error()
    pci_aer_raw_clear_status()  <---- AER registers are cleared
    pcie_do_recovery()

In all the above paths, the AER registers are cleared before
pcie_do_recovery(). The non fatal status AER registers are again cleared
in pcie_do_recovery(). This is redundant.

Remove redundant clearing of AER register in pcie_do_recovery()

Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pcie/err.c | 9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
index b576aa890c76..fe04b0ae22f4 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
@@ -231,14 +231,11 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev,
 
 	/*
 	 * If we have native control of AER, clear error status in the device
-	 * that detected the error.  If the platform retained control of AER,
-	 * it is responsible for clearing this status.  In that case, the
-	 * signaling device may not even be visible to the OS.
+	 * that detected the error.
 	 */
-	if (host->native_aer || pcie_ports_native) {
+	if (host->native_aer || pcie_ports_native)
 		pcie_clear_device_status(dev);
-		pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(dev);
-	}
+
 	pci_info(bridge, "device recovery successful\n");
 	return status;
 
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 8/8] PCI/AER: Include DEVCTL in aer_print_error()
  2021-10-05 17:18 [PATCH v4 0/8] Fix long standing AER Error Handling Issues Naveen Naidu
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] PCI/ERR: Remove redundant clearing of AER register in pcie_do_recovery() Naveen Naidu
@ 2021-10-05 17:18 ` Naveen Naidu
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Naveen Naidu @ 2021-10-05 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, ruscur, oohall
  Cc: Naveen Naidu, linux-kernel-mentees, skhan, linux-kernel,
	linux-pci, linuxppc-dev

Print the contents of Device Control Register of the device which
detected the error. This might help in faster error diagnosis.

Sample output from dummy error injected by aer-inject:

  pcieport 0000:00:03.0: AER: Corrected error received: 0000:00:03.0
  pcieport 0000:00:03.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Data Link Layer, (Receiver)
  pcieport 0000:00:03.0:   device [1b36:000c] error status/mask=00000040/0000e000, devctl=0x000f <-- devctl added to the error log
  pcieport 0000:00:03.0:    [ 6] BadTLP

Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pci.h      |  2 ++
 drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 10 ++++++++--
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
index eb88d8bfeaf7..48ed7f91113b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
@@ -437,6 +437,8 @@ struct aer_err_info {
 	u32 status;		/* COR/UNCOR Error Status */
 	u32 mask;		/* COR/UNCOR Error Mask */
 	struct aer_header_log_regs tlp;	/* TLP Header */
+
+	u16 devctl;
 };
 
 /* Preliminary AER error information processed from Root port */
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
index d3937f5384e4..fdeef9deb016 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
@@ -729,8 +729,8 @@ void aer_print_error(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info)
 		   aer_error_severity_string[info->severity],
 		   aer_error_layer[layer], aer_agent_string[agent]);
 
-	pci_printk(level, dev, "  device [%04x:%04x] error status/mask=%08x/%08x\n",
-		   dev->vendor, dev->device, info->status, info->mask);
+	pci_printk(level, dev, "  device [%04x:%04x] error status/mask=%08x/%08x, devctl=%#06x\n",
+		   dev->vendor, dev->device, info->status, info->mask, info->devctl);
 
 	__aer_print_error(dev, info);
 
@@ -1083,6 +1083,12 @@ int aer_get_device_error_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info)
 	if (!aer)
 		return 0;
 
+	/*
+	 * Cache the value of Device Control Register now, because later the
+	 * device might not be available
+	 */
+	pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, &info->devctl);
+
 	if (info->severity == AER_CORRECTABLE) {
 		pci_read_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS,
 			&info->status);
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] PCI/DPC: Initialize info->id in dpc_process_error()
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] PCI/DPC: Initialize info->id in dpc_process_error() Naveen Naidu
@ 2021-10-21  1:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
  2021-10-21 16:31     ` Naveen Naidu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2021-10-21  1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Naveen Naidu
  Cc: bhelgaas, ruscur, oohall, linux-pci, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
	linux-kernel-mentees

On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:48:10PM +0530, Naveen Naidu wrote:
> In the dpc_process_error() path, info->id isn't initialized before being
> passed to aer_print_error(). In the corresponding AER path, it is
> initialized in aer_isr_one_error().
> 
> The error message shown during Coverity Scan is:
> 
>   Coverity #1461602
>   CID 1461602 (#1 of 1): Uninitialized scalar variable (UNINIT)
>   8. uninit_use_in_call: Using uninitialized value info.id when calling aer_print_error.
> 
> Initialize the "info->id" before passing it to aer_print_error()
> 
> Fixes: 8aefa9b0d910 ("PCI/DPC: Print AER status in DPC event handling")
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> index c556e7beafe3..df3f3a10f8bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> @@ -262,14 +262,14 @@ static int dpc_get_aer_uncorrect_severity(struct pci_dev *dev,
>  
>  void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  {
> -	u16 cap = pdev->dpc_cap, status, source, reason, ext_reason;
> +	u16 cap = pdev->dpc_cap, status, reason, ext_reason;
>  	struct aer_err_info info;
>  
>  	pci_read_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS, &status);
> -	pci_read_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_SOURCE_ID, &source);
> +	pci_read_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_SOURCE_ID, &info.id);
>  
>  	pci_info(pdev, "containment event, status:%#06x source:%#06x\n",
> -		 status, source);
> +		 status, info.id);
>  
>  	reason = (status & PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER_RSN) >> 1;

Per PCIe r5.0, sec 7.9.15.5, the Source ID is defined only when the
Trigger Reason indicates ERR_NONFATAL or ERR_FATAL.  So I think we
need to extract this reason before reading PCI_EXP_DPC_SOURCE_ID,
e.g.,

  reason = (status & PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER_RSN) >> 1;
  if (reason == 1 || reason == 2)
    pci_read_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_SOURCE_ID, &info.id);
  else
    info.id = 0;

>  	ext_reason = (status & PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER_RSN_EXT) >> 5;
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
> Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] PCI/AER: Remove ID from aer_agent_string[]
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] PCI/AER: Remove ID from aer_agent_string[] Naveen Naidu
@ 2021-10-21  1:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
  2021-10-21 16:30     ` Naveen Naidu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2021-10-21  1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Naveen Naidu
  Cc: bhelgaas, ruscur, oohall, linux-pci, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
	linux-kernel-mentees

On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:48:08PM +0530, Naveen Naidu wrote:
> Currently, we do not print the "id" field in the AER error logs. Yet the
> aer_agent_string[] has the word "id" in it. The AER error log looks
> like:
> 
>   pcieport 0000:00:03.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Data Link Layer, (Receiver ID)
> 
> Without the "id" field in the error log, The aer_agent_string[]
> (eg: "Receiver ID") does not make sense. A user reading the
> aer_agent_string[] in the log, might inadvertently look for an "id"
> field and not finding it might lead to confusion.
> 
> Remove the "ID" from the aer_agent_string[].
> 
> The following are sample dummy errors inject via aer-inject.

I like this, and the problem it fixes was my fault because
these "ID" strings should have been removed by 010caed4ccb6.

If it's straightforward enough, it would be nice to have the
aer-inject command line here in the commit log to make it easier
for people to play with this.

> Before
> =======
> 
> In 010caed4ccb6 ("PCI/AER: Decode Error Source Requester ID"),
> the "id" field was removed from the AER error logs, so currently AER
> logs look like:
> 
>   pcieport 0000:00:03.0: AER: Corrected error received: 0000:00:03:0
>   pcieport 0000:00:03.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Data Link Layer, (Receiver ID) <--- no id field
>   pcieport 0000:00:03.0:   device [1b36:000c] error status/mask=00000040/0000e000
>   pcieport 0000:00:03.0:    [ 6] BadTLP
> 
> After
> ======
> 
>   pcieport 0000:00:03.0: AER: Corrected error received: 0000:00:03.0
>   pcieport 0000:00:03.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Data Link Layer, (Receiver)
>   pcieport 0000:00:03.0:   device [1b36:000c] error status/mask=00000040/0000e000
>   pcieport 0000:00:03.0:    [ 6] BadTLP
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> index 9784fdcf3006..241ff361b43c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> @@ -516,10 +516,10 @@ static const char *aer_uncorrectable_error_string[] = {
>  };
>  
>  static const char *aer_agent_string[] = {
> -	"Receiver ID",
> -	"Requester ID",
> -	"Completer ID",
> -	"Transmitter ID"
> +	"Receiver",
> +	"Requester",
> +	"Completer",
> +	"Transmitter"
>  };
>  
>  #define aer_stats_dev_attr(name, stats_array, strings_array,		\
> @@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ void aer_print_error(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info)
>  	const char *level;
>  
>  	if (!info->status) {
> -		pci_err(dev, "PCIe Bus Error: severity=%s, type=Inaccessible, (Unregistered Agent ID)\n",
> +		pci_err(dev, "PCIe Bus Error: severity=%s, type=Inaccessible, (Unregistered Agent)\n",
>  			aer_error_severity_string[info->severity]);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
> Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] PCI/DPC: Use pci_aer_clear_status() in dpc_process_error()
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] PCI/DPC: Use pci_aer_clear_status() " Naveen Naidu
@ 2021-10-21  1:40   ` Bjorn Helgaas
  2021-10-21 16:36     ` Naveen Naidu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2021-10-21  1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Naveen Naidu
  Cc: bhelgaas, ruscur, oohall, linux-pci, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
	linux-kernel-mentees

On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:48:11PM +0530, Naveen Naidu wrote:
> dpc_process_error() clears both AER fatal and non fatal status
> registers. Instead of clearing each status registers via a different
> function call use pci_aer_clear_status().
> 
> This helps clean up the code a bit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> index df3f3a10f8bc..faf4a1e77fab 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> @@ -288,8 +288,7 @@ void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  		 dpc_get_aer_uncorrect_severity(pdev, &info) &&
>  		 aer_get_device_error_info(pdev, &info)) {
>  		aer_print_error(pdev, &info);
> -		pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(pdev);
> -		pci_aer_clear_fatal_status(pdev);
> +		pci_aer_clear_status(pdev);

The commit log suggests that this is a simple cleanup that doesn't
change any behavior, but that's not quite true:

  - The new code would clear PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, but the old code
    does not.

  - The old code masks the status bits with the severity bits before
    clearing, but the new code does not.

The commit log needs to show why these changes are what we want.

>  	}
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
> Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] PCI/DPC: Converge EDR and DPC Path of clearing AER registers
  2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] PCI/DPC: Converge EDR and DPC Path of clearing AER registers Naveen Naidu
@ 2021-10-21  2:09   ` Bjorn Helgaas
  2021-10-21 16:53     ` Naveen Naidu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2021-10-21  2:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Naveen Naidu
  Cc: bhelgaas, ruscur, oohall, linux-pci, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
	linux-kernel-mentees, Keith Busch, Sinan Kaya, Oza Pawandeep

[+cc Keith, Sinan, Oza]

On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:48:12PM +0530, Naveen Naidu wrote:
> In the EDR path, AER registers are cleared *after* DPC error event is
> processed. The process stack in EDR is:
> 
>   edr_handle_event()
>     dpc_process_error()
>     pci_aer_raw_clear_status()
>     pcie_do_recovery()
> 
> But in DPC path, AER status registers are cleared *while* processing
> the error. The process stack in DPC is:
> 
>   dpc_handler()
>     dpc_process_error()
>       pci_aer_clear_status()
>     pcie_do_recovery()

These are accurate but they both include dpc_process_error(), so we
need a hint to show why the one here is different from the one in the
EDR path, e.g.,

  dpc_handler
    dpc_process_error
      if (reason == 0)
        pci_aer_clear_status    # uncorrectable errors only
    pcie_do_recovery

> In EDR path, AER status registers are cleared irrespective of whether
> the error was an RP PIO or unmasked uncorrectable error. But in DPC, the
> AER status registers are cleared only when it's an unmasked uncorrectable
> error.
> 
> This leads to two different behaviours for the same task (handling of
> DPC errors) in FFS systems and when native OS has control.

FFS?

I'd really like to have a specific example of how a user would observe
this difference.  I know you probably don't have two systems to
compare like that, but maybe we can work it out manually.

I guess you're saying the problem is in the native DPC handling, and
we don't clear the AER status registers for ERR_NONFATAL,
ERR_NONFATAL, etc., right?

I think the current behavior is from 8aefa9b0d910 ("PCI/DPC: Print AER
status in DPC event handling"), where Keith explicitly mentions those
cases.  The commit log here should connect back to that and explain
whether something has changed.

I cc'd Keith and the reviewers of that change in case any of them have
time to dig into this again.

> Bring the same semantics for clearing the AER status register in EDR
> path and DPC path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> index faf4a1e77fab..68899a3db126 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> @@ -288,7 +288,6 @@ void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  		 dpc_get_aer_uncorrect_severity(pdev, &info) &&
>  		 aer_get_device_error_info(pdev, &info)) {
>  		aer_print_error(pdev, &info);
> -		pci_aer_clear_status(pdev);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -297,6 +296,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dpc_handler(int irq, void *context)
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev = context;
>  
>  	dpc_process_error(pdev);
> +	pci_aer_clear_status(pdev);
>  
>  	/* We configure DPC so it only triggers on ERR_FATAL */
>  	pcie_do_recovery(pdev, pci_channel_io_frozen, dpc_reset_link);
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
> Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] PCI/AER: Remove ID from aer_agent_string[]
  2021-10-21  1:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
@ 2021-10-21 16:30     ` Naveen Naidu
  2021-10-21 17:03       ` Bjorn Helgaas
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Naveen Naidu @ 2021-10-21 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Helgaas
  Cc: bhelgaas, ruscur, oohall, linux-pci, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
	linux-kernel-mentees

On 20/10, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:48:08PM +0530, Naveen Naidu wrote:
> > Currently, we do not print the "id" field in the AER error logs. Yet the
> > aer_agent_string[] has the word "id" in it. The AER error log looks
> > like:
> > 
> >   pcieport 0000:00:03.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Data Link Layer, (Receiver ID)
> > 
> > Without the "id" field in the error log, The aer_agent_string[]
> > (eg: "Receiver ID") does not make sense. A user reading the
> > aer_agent_string[] in the log, might inadvertently look for an "id"
> > field and not finding it might lead to confusion.
> > 
> > Remove the "ID" from the aer_agent_string[].
> > 
> > The following are sample dummy errors inject via aer-inject.
> 
> I like this, and the problem it fixes was my fault because
> these "ID" strings should have been removed by 010caed4ccb6.
> 
> If it's straightforward enough, it would be nice to have the
> aer-inject command line here in the commit log to make it easier
> for people to play with this.
>

Thank you for the review. Do you mean something like:

The following sample dummy errors are injected via aer-inject via the
following steps:

  1. The steps to compile the aer-inject tool is mentioned in (Section
     4. Software error inject) of the document [1]

     [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/PCI/pcieaer-howto.txt

     Make sure to place the aer-inject executable at the home directory
     of the qemu system or at any other place.

  2. Emulate a PCIE architecture using qemu, A sample looks like
     following:
     
		qemu-system-x86_64 -kernel ../linux/arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage \
        -initrd  buildroot-build/images/rootfs.cpio.gz \
        -append "console=ttyS0"  \
        -enable-kvm -nographic \
        -M q35 \
        -device pcie-root-port,bus=pcie.0,id=rp1,slot=1 \
        -device pcie-pci-bridge,id=br1,bus=rp1 \
        -device e1000,bus=br1,addr=8
       
    Note that the PCIe features are available only when using the 
    'q35' Machine [2]
    [2]: https://github.com/qemu/qemu/blob/master/docs/pcie.txt

  3. Once the qemu system starts up, create a sample aer-file or use any
     example aer file from [3]

     [3]:
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gong.chen/aer-inject.git/tree/examples

  4. Inject any aer-error using
      
      ./aer-inject aer-file

This does look a tad bit longer for a commit log so I am unsure if you
would like to have it there. If you are okay with it, I would be happy
to add it to that :)

> > Before
> > =======
> > 
> > In 010caed4ccb6 ("PCI/AER: Decode Error Source Requester ID"),
> > the "id" field was removed from the AER error logs, so currently AER
> > logs look like:
> > 
> >   pcieport 0000:00:03.0: AER: Corrected error received: 0000:00:03:0
> >   pcieport 0000:00:03.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Data Link Layer, (Receiver ID) <--- no id field
> >   pcieport 0000:00:03.0:   device [1b36:000c] error status/mask=00000040/0000e000
> >   pcieport 0000:00:03.0:    [ 6] BadTLP
> > 
> > After
> > ======
> > 
> >   pcieport 0000:00:03.0: AER: Corrected error received: 0000:00:03.0
> >   pcieport 0000:00:03.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Data Link Layer, (Receiver)
> >   pcieport 0000:00:03.0:   device [1b36:000c] error status/mask=00000040/0000e000
> >   pcieport 0000:00:03.0:    [ 6] BadTLP
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 10 +++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> > index 9784fdcf3006..241ff361b43c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> > @@ -516,10 +516,10 @@ static const char *aer_uncorrectable_error_string[] = {
> >  };
> >  
> >  static const char *aer_agent_string[] = {
> > -	"Receiver ID",
> > -	"Requester ID",
> > -	"Completer ID",
> > -	"Transmitter ID"
> > +	"Receiver",
> > +	"Requester",
> > +	"Completer",
> > +	"Transmitter"
> >  };
> >  
> >  #define aer_stats_dev_attr(name, stats_array, strings_array,		\
> > @@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ void aer_print_error(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info)
> >  	const char *level;
> >  
> >  	if (!info->status) {
> > -		pci_err(dev, "PCIe Bus Error: severity=%s, type=Inaccessible, (Unregistered Agent ID)\n",
> > +		pci_err(dev, "PCIe Bus Error: severity=%s, type=Inaccessible, (Unregistered Agent)\n",
> >  			aer_error_severity_string[info->severity]);
> >  		goto out;
> >  	}
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
> > Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] PCI/DPC: Initialize info->id in dpc_process_error()
  2021-10-21  1:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
@ 2021-10-21 16:31     ` Naveen Naidu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Naveen Naidu @ 2021-10-21 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Helgaas
  Cc: bhelgaas, ruscur, oohall, linux-pci, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
	linux-kernel-mentees

On 20/10, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:48:10PM +0530, Naveen Naidu wrote:
> > In the dpc_process_error() path, info->id isn't initialized before being
> > passed to aer_print_error(). In the corresponding AER path, it is
> > initialized in aer_isr_one_error().
> > 
> > The error message shown during Coverity Scan is:
> > 
> >   Coverity #1461602
> >   CID 1461602 (#1 of 1): Uninitialized scalar variable (UNINIT)
> >   8. uninit_use_in_call: Using uninitialized value info.id when calling aer_print_error.
> > 
> > Initialize the "info->id" before passing it to aer_print_error()
> > 
> > Fixes: 8aefa9b0d910 ("PCI/DPC: Print AER status in DPC event handling")
> > Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> > index c556e7beafe3..df3f3a10f8bc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> > @@ -262,14 +262,14 @@ static int dpc_get_aer_uncorrect_severity(struct pci_dev *dev,
> >  
> >  void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >  {
> > -	u16 cap = pdev->dpc_cap, status, source, reason, ext_reason;
> > +	u16 cap = pdev->dpc_cap, status, reason, ext_reason;
> >  	struct aer_err_info info;
> >  
> >  	pci_read_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS, &status);
> > -	pci_read_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_SOURCE_ID, &source);
> > +	pci_read_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_SOURCE_ID, &info.id);
> >  
> >  	pci_info(pdev, "containment event, status:%#06x source:%#06x\n",
> > -		 status, source);
> > +		 status, info.id);
> >  
> >  	reason = (status & PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER_RSN) >> 1;
> 
> Per PCIe r5.0, sec 7.9.15.5, the Source ID is defined only when the
> Trigger Reason indicates ERR_NONFATAL or ERR_FATAL.  So I think we
> need to extract this reason before reading PCI_EXP_DPC_SOURCE_ID,
> e.g.,
> 
>   reason = (status & PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER_RSN) >> 1;
>   if (reason == 1 || reason == 2)
>     pci_read_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_SOURCE_ID, &info.id);
>   else
>     info.id = 0;
>

Thank you for the review, I'll make this change when I send a v5 for the
patch series.

> >  	ext_reason = (status & PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER_RSN_EXT) >> 5;
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
> > Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] PCI/DPC: Use pci_aer_clear_status() in dpc_process_error()
  2021-10-21  1:40   ` Bjorn Helgaas
@ 2021-10-21 16:36     ` Naveen Naidu
  2021-10-21 17:05       ` Bjorn Helgaas
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Naveen Naidu @ 2021-10-21 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Helgaas
  Cc: bhelgaas, ruscur, oohall, linux-pci, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
	linux-kernel-mentees

On 20/10, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:48:11PM +0530, Naveen Naidu wrote:
> > dpc_process_error() clears both AER fatal and non fatal status
> > registers. Instead of clearing each status registers via a different
> > function call use pci_aer_clear_status().
> > 
> > This helps clean up the code a bit.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 3 +--
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> > index df3f3a10f8bc..faf4a1e77fab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> > @@ -288,8 +288,7 @@ void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >  		 dpc_get_aer_uncorrect_severity(pdev, &info) &&
> >  		 aer_get_device_error_info(pdev, &info)) {
> >  		aer_print_error(pdev, &info);
> > -		pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(pdev);
> > -		pci_aer_clear_fatal_status(pdev);
> > +		pci_aer_clear_status(pdev);
> 
> The commit log suggests that this is a simple cleanup that doesn't
> change any behavior, but that's not quite true:
> 
>   - The new code would clear PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, but the old code
>     does not.
> 
>   - The old code masks the status bits with the severity bits before
>     clearing, but the new code does not.
> 
> The commit log needs to show why these changes are what we want.
>

Reading through the code again, I realize how wrong(stupid) I was when
making this patch. I was thinking that:

  pci_aer_clear_status() = pci_aer_clear_fatal_status() + pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status()

Now I understand, that it is not at all the case. I apologize for the
mistake. I'll make sure to be meticulous while reading functions and not
just assume their behaviour just from their function names.

I'll drop this patch in the next version of the patch series I make.

Apologies again ^^'

> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
> > Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] PCI/DPC: Converge EDR and DPC Path of clearing AER registers
  2021-10-21  2:09   ` Bjorn Helgaas
@ 2021-10-21 16:53     ` Naveen Naidu
  2021-10-21 17:11       ` Bjorn Helgaas
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Naveen Naidu @ 2021-10-21 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Helgaas
  Cc: bhelgaas, ruscur, oohall, linux-pci, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
	linux-kernel-mentees, Keith Busch, Sinan Kaya, Oza Pawandeep

On 20/10, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Keith, Sinan, Oza]
> 
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:48:12PM +0530, Naveen Naidu wrote:
> > In the EDR path, AER registers are cleared *after* DPC error event is
> > processed. The process stack in EDR is:
> > 
> >   edr_handle_event()
> >     dpc_process_error()
> >     pci_aer_raw_clear_status()
> >     pcie_do_recovery()
> > 
> > But in DPC path, AER status registers are cleared *while* processing
> > the error. The process stack in DPC is:
> > 
> >   dpc_handler()
> >     dpc_process_error()
> >       pci_aer_clear_status()
> >     pcie_do_recovery()
> 
> These are accurate but they both include dpc_process_error(), so we
> need a hint to show why the one here is different from the one in the
> EDR path, e.g.,
> 
>   dpc_handler
>     dpc_process_error
>       if (reason == 0)
>         pci_aer_clear_status    # uncorrectable errors only
>     pcie_do_recovery
> 
> > In EDR path, AER status registers are cleared irrespective of whether
> > the error was an RP PIO or unmasked uncorrectable error. But in DPC, the
> > AER status registers are cleared only when it's an unmasked uncorrectable
> > error.
> > 
> > This leads to two different behaviours for the same task (handling of
> > DPC errors) in FFS systems and when native OS has control.
> 
> FFS?
>

Firmware First Systems

> I'd really like to have a specific example of how a user would observe
> this difference.  I know you probably don't have two systems to
> compare like that, but maybe we can work it out manually.
> 

Apologies again! Reading through the code again and the specification, I
realize that my understanding was very incorrect at the time of making
this patch. I grossly oversimplified EDR and DPC when I was learning
about it.

I'll drop this patch when I send the v5 for the series.

Apologies again ^^'

> I guess you're saying the problem is in the native DPC handling, and
> we don't clear the AER status registers for ERR_NONFATAL,
> ERR_NONFATAL, etc., right?
> 

But yes, I did have this question though (I wasn't able to find the
answers to it when reading the spec). Why do we not clear the entire
ERR_NONFATAL and ERR_FATAL registers in the DPC path just like EDR does
using the pci_aer_raw_clear_status() before going to pcie_do_recovery()

I am sure I might have missed something in the spec. I guess I'll
look/re-read these bits again.

Thanks for the review :)

> I think the current behavior is from 8aefa9b0d910 ("PCI/DPC: Print AER
> status in DPC event handling"), where Keith explicitly mentions those
> cases.  The commit log here should connect back to that and explain
> whether something has changed.
> 
> I cc'd Keith and the reviewers of that change in case any of them have
> time to dig into this again.
> 
> > Bring the same semantics for clearing the AER status register in EDR
> > path and DPC path.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> > index faf4a1e77fab..68899a3db126 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> > @@ -288,7 +288,6 @@ void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >  		 dpc_get_aer_uncorrect_severity(pdev, &info) &&
> >  		 aer_get_device_error_info(pdev, &info)) {
> >  		aer_print_error(pdev, &info);
> > -		pci_aer_clear_status(pdev);
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -297,6 +296,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dpc_handler(int irq, void *context)
> >  	struct pci_dev *pdev = context;
> >  
> >  	dpc_process_error(pdev);
> > +	pci_aer_clear_status(pdev);
> >  
> >  	/* We configure DPC so it only triggers on ERR_FATAL */
> >  	pcie_do_recovery(pdev, pci_channel_io_frozen, dpc_reset_link);
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
> > Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] PCI/AER: Remove ID from aer_agent_string[]
  2021-10-21 16:30     ` Naveen Naidu
@ 2021-10-21 17:03       ` Bjorn Helgaas
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2021-10-21 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Naveen Naidu
  Cc: bhelgaas, ruscur, oohall, linux-pci, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
	linux-kernel-mentees

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:00:21PM +0530, Naveen Naidu wrote:
> On 20/10, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:48:08PM +0530, Naveen Naidu wrote:
> > > Currently, we do not print the "id" field in the AER error logs. Yet the
> > > aer_agent_string[] has the word "id" in it. The AER error log looks
> > > like:
> > > 
> > >   pcieport 0000:00:03.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Data Link Layer, (Receiver ID)
> > > 
> > > Without the "id" field in the error log, The aer_agent_string[]
> > > (eg: "Receiver ID") does not make sense. A user reading the
> > > aer_agent_string[] in the log, might inadvertently look for an "id"
> > > field and not finding it might lead to confusion.
> > > 
> > > Remove the "ID" from the aer_agent_string[].
> > > 
> > > The following are sample dummy errors inject via aer-inject.
> > 
> > I like this, and the problem it fixes was my fault because
> > these "ID" strings should have been removed by 010caed4ccb6.
> > 
> > If it's straightforward enough, it would be nice to have the
> > aer-inject command line here in the commit log to make it easier
> > for people to play with this.
> >
> 
> Thank you for the review. Do you mean something like:
> 
> The following sample dummy errors are injected via aer-inject via the
> following steps:
> 
>   1. The steps to compile the aer-inject tool is mentioned in (Section
>      4. Software error inject) of the document [1]
> 
>      [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/PCI/pcieaer-howto.txt
> 
>      Make sure to place the aer-inject executable at the home directory
>      of the qemu system or at any other place.
> 
>   2. Emulate a PCIE architecture using qemu, A sample looks like
>      following:
>      
> 		qemu-system-x86_64 -kernel ../linux/arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage \
>         -initrd  buildroot-build/images/rootfs.cpio.gz \
>         -append "console=ttyS0"  \
>         -enable-kvm -nographic \
>         -M q35 \
>         -device pcie-root-port,bus=pcie.0,id=rp1,slot=1 \
>         -device pcie-pci-bridge,id=br1,bus=rp1 \
>         -device e1000,bus=br1,addr=8
>        
>     Note that the PCIe features are available only when using the 
>     'q35' Machine [2]
>     [2]: https://github.com/qemu/qemu/blob/master/docs/pcie.txt
> 
>   3. Once the qemu system starts up, create a sample aer-file or use any
>      example aer file from [3]
> 
>      [3]:
>      https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gong.chen/aer-inject.git/tree/examples
> 
>   4. Inject any aer-error using
>       
>       ./aer-inject aer-file
> 
> This does look a tad bit longer for a commit log so I am unsure if you
> would like to have it there. If you are okay with it, I would be happy
> to add it to that :)

Yes, that's kind of long.  Something like this
https://git.kernel.org/linus/d95f20c4f070 would be enough for the
commit log, especially since you've now provided all the details in
the email thread, where we can find them via the Link: tag.

Bjorn

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] PCI/DPC: Use pci_aer_clear_status() in dpc_process_error()
  2021-10-21 16:36     ` Naveen Naidu
@ 2021-10-21 17:05       ` Bjorn Helgaas
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2021-10-21 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Naveen Naidu
  Cc: bhelgaas, ruscur, oohall, linux-pci, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
	linux-kernel-mentees

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:06:11PM +0530, Naveen Naidu wrote:
> On 20/10, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:48:11PM +0530, Naveen Naidu wrote:
> > > dpc_process_error() clears both AER fatal and non fatal status
> > > registers. Instead of clearing each status registers via a different
> > > function call use pci_aer_clear_status().
> > > 
> > > This helps clean up the code a bit.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 3 +--
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> > > index df3f3a10f8bc..faf4a1e77fab 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> > > @@ -288,8 +288,7 @@ void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > >  		 dpc_get_aer_uncorrect_severity(pdev, &info) &&
> > >  		 aer_get_device_error_info(pdev, &info)) {
> > >  		aer_print_error(pdev, &info);
> > > -		pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(pdev);
> > > -		pci_aer_clear_fatal_status(pdev);
> > > +		pci_aer_clear_status(pdev);
> > 
> > The commit log suggests that this is a simple cleanup that doesn't
> > change any behavior, but that's not quite true:
> > 
> >   - The new code would clear PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, but the old code
> >     does not.
> > 
> >   - The old code masks the status bits with the severity bits before
> >     clearing, but the new code does not.
> > 
> > The commit log needs to show why these changes are what we want.
> >
> 
> Reading through the code again, I realize how wrong(stupid) I was when
> making this patch. I was thinking that:
> 
>   pci_aer_clear_status() = pci_aer_clear_fatal_status() + pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status()
> 
> Now I understand, that it is not at all the case. I apologize for the
> mistake. I'll make sure to be meticulous while reading functions and not
> just assume their behaviour just from their function names.

No problem, one could argue that the collection of pci_aer_clear_*()
functions that do slightly different things is itself a defect.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] PCI/DPC: Converge EDR and DPC Path of clearing AER registers
  2021-10-21 16:53     ` Naveen Naidu
@ 2021-10-21 17:11       ` Bjorn Helgaas
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2021-10-21 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Naveen Naidu
  Cc: bhelgaas, ruscur, oohall, linux-pci, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
	linux-kernel-mentees, Keith Busch, Sinan Kaya, Oza Pawandeep

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:23:30PM +0530, Naveen Naidu wrote:
> On 20/10, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:48:12PM +0530, Naveen Naidu wrote:

> > > In EDR path, AER status registers are cleared irrespective of whether
> > > the error was an RP PIO or unmasked uncorrectable error. But in DPC, the
> > > AER status registers are cleared only when it's an unmasked uncorrectable
> > > error.
> > > 
> > > This leads to two different behaviours for the same task (handling of
> > > DPC errors) in FFS systems and when native OS has control.
> > 
> > FFS?
> 
> Firmware First Systems

I assumed that's what it was, but it's helpful to use the same terms
used by the specs to make things easier to find.  I don't think it's
actually the case that "Firmware First" necessary applies to the
entire system, since the ACPI FIRMWARE_FIRST flag is a per-error
source thing, not a per-system thing.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-21 17:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-10-05 17:18 [PATCH v4 0/8] Fix long standing AER Error Handling Issues Naveen Naidu
2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] PCI/AER: Remove ID from aer_agent_string[] Naveen Naidu
2021-10-21  1:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-21 16:30     ` Naveen Naidu
2021-10-21 17:03       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] PCI: Cleanup struct aer_err_info Naveen Naidu
2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] PCI/DPC: Initialize info->id in dpc_process_error() Naveen Naidu
2021-10-21  1:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-21 16:31     ` Naveen Naidu
2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] PCI/DPC: Use pci_aer_clear_status() " Naveen Naidu
2021-10-21  1:40   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-21 16:36     ` Naveen Naidu
2021-10-21 17:05       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] PCI/DPC: Converge EDR and DPC Path of clearing AER registers Naveen Naidu
2021-10-21  2:09   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-21 16:53     ` Naveen Naidu
2021-10-21 17:11       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] PCI/AER: Clear error device AER registers in aer_irq() Naveen Naidu
2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] PCI/ERR: Remove redundant clearing of AER register in pcie_do_recovery() Naveen Naidu
2021-10-05 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] PCI/AER: Include DEVCTL in aer_print_error() Naveen Naidu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).