linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Wei Wang <wvw@google.com>, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	Alessio Balsini <balsini@google.com>,
	Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>,
	Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@matbug.net>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sched/deadline: Add dl_bw_capacity()
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 17:09:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d07a0517-b1bf-0879-575b-7933063c7597@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200506123738.GJ17381@localhost.localdomain>

On 06/05/2020 14:37, Juri Lelli wrote:
> On 06/05/20 12:54, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> On 27/04/2020 10:37, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:

[...]

>> There is an issue w/ excl. cpusets and cpuset.sched_load_balance=0. The
>> latter is needed to demonstrate the problem since DL task affinity can't
>> be altered.
>>
>> A CPU in such a cpuset has its rq attached to def_root_domain which does
>> not have its 'sum_cpu_capacity' properly set.
> 
> Hummm, but if sched_load_balance is disabled it means that we've now got
> a subset of CPUs which (from a DL AC pow) are partitioned. So, I'd tend

Yes, the CPUs of the cpuset w/ cpuset.sched_load_balance=0 (cpuset B in
the example).

> to say that we actually want to check new tasks bw requirement against
> the available bandwidth of the particular CPU they happen to be running
> (and will continue to run) when setscheduler is called.

By 'available bandwidth of the particular CPU' you refer to
'\Sum_{cpu_rq(i)->rd->span} CPU capacity', right?

This is what this fix tries to achieve. Regardless whether cpu_rq(i)->rd
is a 'real' rd or the def_root_domain, dl_bw_capacity() will now always
return '\Sum_{cpu_rq(i)->rd->span} CPU capacity'

> If then load balance is enabled again, AC check we did above should
> still be valid for all tasks admitted in the meantime, no?
 
Example (w/ this fix) on Juno [L b b L L L], capacity_orig_of(L)=446 :

mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/A
echo 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/A/cpuset.mems
echo 1 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/A/cpuset.cpu_exclusive
echo 0-2 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/A/cpuset.cpus

mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/B
echo 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/B/cpuset.mems
echo 1 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/B/cpuset.cpu_exclusive
echo 3-5 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/B/cpuset.cpus

echo 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/B/cpuset.sched_load_balance
echo 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cpuset.sched_load_balance

echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/B/tasks
chrt -d --sched-runtime 8000 --sched-period 16000 -p 0 $$

...
[  144.920102] __dl_bw_capacity CPU3 rd->span=3-5 return 1338
[  144.925607] sched_dl_overflow: [bash 1999] task_cpu(p)=3 cap=1338 cpus_ptr=3-5
[  144.932841] __dl_bw_capacity CPU3 rd->span=3-5 return 1338
...

echo 1 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/B/cpuset.sched_load_balance

echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/B/tasks
chrt -d --sched-runtime 8000 --sched-period 16000 -p 0 $$

...
[  254.367982] __dl_bw_capacity CPU5 rd->span=3-5 return 1338
[  254.373487] sched_dl_overflow: [bash 2052] task_cpu(p)=5 cap=1338 cpus_ptr=3-5
[  254.380721] __dl_bw_capacity CPU5 rd->span=3-5 return 1338
...

Regardless of 'B/cpuset.sched_load_balance'
'\Sum_{cpu_rq(i)->rd->span} CPU capacity' stays 1338 (3*446)

So IMHO, DL AC check stays intact.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-06 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-27  8:37 [PATCH v2 0/6] Capacity awareness for SCHED_DEADLINE Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-27  8:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] sched/topology: Store root domain CPU capacity sum Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-27  8:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] sched/deadline: Optimize dl_bw_cpus() Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-30 10:55   ` Pavan Kondeti
2020-05-01 16:12     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-27  8:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] sched/deadline: Add dl_bw_capacity() Dietmar Eggemann
2020-05-06 10:54   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-05-06 12:37     ` Juri Lelli
2020-05-06 15:09       ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2020-05-11  8:01         ` Juri Lelli
2020-05-12 12:39           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-05-15 12:26             ` Juri Lelli
2020-04-27  8:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] sched/deadline: Improve admission control for asymmetric CPU capacities Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-27  8:37 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] sched/deadline: Make DL capacity-aware Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-30 13:10   ` Pavan Kondeti
2020-05-01 16:12     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-05-04  3:58       ` Pavan Kondeti
2020-05-05 18:02         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-27  8:37 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] sched/deadline: Implement fallback mechanism for !fit case Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-27 13:34   ` Juri Lelli
2020-04-27 14:17     ` luca abeni
2020-04-29 17:39       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-30 11:00         ` Pavan Kondeti
2020-05-01 16:12           ` Dietmar Eggemann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d07a0517-b1bf-0879-575b-7933063c7597@arm.com \
    --to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=balsini@google.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@matbug.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pkondeti@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=wvw@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).