From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE073C5DF61 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 07:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACAF52187F for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 07:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726923AbfKGHQw (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Nov 2019 02:16:52 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49786 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726498AbfKGHQw (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Nov 2019 02:16:52 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6981AD85; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 07:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [RFC 00/11] ARM: Realtek RTD1195/RTD1295 SoC info To: linux-realtek-soc@lists.infradead.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <20191103013645.9856-1-afaerber@suse.de> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= Organization: SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Message-ID: Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 08:16:50 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191103013645.9856-1-afaerber@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am 03.11.19 um 02:36 schrieb Andreas Färber: > Prepared but not included here is: > * RTD1395 family, which we don't have a DT for yet, > * RTD1619 family, which we don't have a DT for yet, Chip ID to be verified, > * RTD1319 family, which we don't have a DT for yet, with TODO for its Chip ID. > > Latest experimental patches at: > https://github.com/afaerber/linux/commits/rtd1295-next For anyone wondering, the RTD1395 SoC info patch in above tree had a typo in the chip id that has been fixed and tested on BPi-M4 now. Cheers, Andreas -- SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)