Re: [PATCH 10/24] leds: lp8860: Use led_compose_name()

[Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>]

On 11/06/2018 04:07 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Switch to using generic LED support for composing LED class
> device name.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c
> index 39c72a9..7c12ccd 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
>  #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>  #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> -#include <uapi/linux/uleds.h>
>  
>  #define LP8860_DISP_CL1_BRT_MSB		0x00
>  #define LP8860_DISP_CL1_BRT_LSB		0x01
> @@ -87,6 +86,8 @@
>  
>  #define LP8860_CLEAR_FAULTS		0x01
>  
> +#define LP8860_NAME			"lp8860"
> +
>  /**
>   * struct lp8860_led -
>   * @lock - Lock for reading/writing the device
> @@ -96,7 +97,6 @@
>   * @eeprom_regmap - EEPROM register map
>   * @enable_gpio - VDDIO/EN gpio to enable communication interface
>   * @regulator - LED supply regulator pointer
> - * @label - LED label
>   */
>  struct lp8860_led {
>  	struct mutex lock;
> @@ -106,7 +106,6 @@ struct lp8860_led {
>  	struct regmap *eeprom_regmap;
>  	struct gpio_desc *enable_gpio;
>  	struct regulator *regulator;
> -	char label[LED_MAX_NAME_SIZE];
>  };
>  
>  struct lp8860_eeprom_reg {
> @@ -387,25 +386,26 @@ static int lp8860_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  	struct lp8860_led *led;
>  	struct device_node *np = client->dev.of_node;
>  	struct device_node *child_node;
> -	const char *name;
> +	struct led_init_data init_data;
>  
>  	led = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*led), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!led)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child_node) {
> -		led->led_dev.default_trigger = of_get_property(child_node,
> -						    "linux,default-trigger",
> -						    NULL);
> -
> -		ret = of_property_read_string(child_node, "label", &name);
> -		if (!ret)
> -			snprintf(led->label, sizeof(led->label), "%s:%s",
> -				 id->name, name);
> -		else
> -			snprintf(led->label, sizeof(led->label),
> -				"%s::display_cluster", id->name);
> -	}

We need to keep a loop here looking for additional nodes as this device has string support and just
not cluster support.

Just need to get the other LED patches done.

> +	child_node = of_get_next_available_child(np, NULL);
> +	if (!child_node)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	init_data.fwnode = of_fwnode_handle(child_node),
> +
> +	led->led_dev.default_trigger = of_get_property(child_node,
> +					    "linux,default-trigger",
> +					    NULL);
> +
> +	ret = led_compose_name(init_data.fwnode, LP8860_NAME,
> +			       ":display_cluster", init_data.name);

Should we use the #defines here for display_cluster?

> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
>  
>  	led->enable_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev,
>  						   "enable", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> @@ -420,7 +420,6 @@ static int lp8860_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  		led->regulator = NULL;
>  
>  	led->client = client;
> -	led->led_dev.name = led->label;
>  	led->led_dev.brightness_set_blocking = lp8860_brightness_set;
>  
>  	mutex_init(&led->lock);
> @@ -447,7 +446,8 @@ static int lp8860_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	ret = devm_led_classdev_register(&client->dev, &led->led_dev);
> +	ret = devm_led_classdev_register_ext(&client->dev, &led->led_dev,
> +					     &init_data);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "led register err: %d\n", ret);
>  		return ret;
> 


-- 
------------------
Dan Murphy