From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932206AbdK1UdN (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:33:13 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:53763 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753191AbdK1UdL (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:33:11 -0500 Subject: Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations To: Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Cc: Arvind Yadav , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Sakamoto , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML References: <6da7e6dc-b181-d26c-9f09-6592469193be@users.sourceforge.net> <99282c06-bfad-d7cf-16d8-eb1e015ebdbd@users.sourceforge.net> <19724fa4-47eb-827c-cb17-126440500179@users.sourceforge.net> <727d5044-bad0-5170-83c0-dfddcc919588@users.sourceforge.net> <68fd71f5-a3e5-dbb7-d0d9-f9844fabe6c8@users.sourceforge.net> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 21:32:28 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:UTdkGmf7PPWvGtny+zG3b1VN9U5QBqgRmuZQOHQNR8e2CI5jANn 5xtYjrOnHnudyasnlXED4amEx72XqPHpEYMCX+spgK+z1yG5BDMWHgYA9Dv/A6fdVHW+f7q 4/JLF6mRUYlKKPX64RPDggRYf3yzBVoO9If+QNAM/igDcp4FU3QtZao2Ws//SAzjkJxcTNI UFpJE/R4F25xbW0xSGoHw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:cjJo9IiyyWo=:9ZdUOEt7yDNeM9vUvJO/Fx VgERXRnNa6lUs+QNOYb2baC8L/Z5qqUxvBfwbuOtdzEMdMSXLR2Lc8OhCPvRmCaQO59Eopyqj HImzkX3Y373gQJUiI+S2imA7gKMsKyBi8OSfDYmNVvKnR6cLKQ6d6zteJHKQg3d06IhPywUJm 0JmWZKKtDjjI7CixOL2WSZAu4XtcNb0waUOEruN0BrQWVGCuJJKf09Cnr+lyTJT+ftzzPZ6cX CPXAedZgnLbN74+W/jvuX51xegsxxnECDor5nRELZnwoeBC4RDfRmToWCXMiataDAceyEYFn3 Tf8+5nBXANQJyJWPttINeBisohv2qdFj4LXvrxWb6GOEp3Ph3wn9eplfEgqLRsoCIMSEDBUu+ /cpHaktANwltab12QUa5dT9qoH/ZONUAtLtG1ITnr4SRFPY5aFjk9JoYlQO780kiK1TrAYA+q 4dEXcqpdMDbdbRuDyyy7+b9xN1teDZ/51PPzmt7pXqtEDS15SGq72OUuuFp+ISg6ggUbr+qdq mUobrqxQPOenVSilbSU4sjWpkxKOp1qGcDPpSuJIo2GYmSDmLztHeXdnbClbIXasWvYmnfarb v1DE9+gmiSiE0dsZ9Sj4dd8oU3lhgCanfKxdhujJxn/IKTMrVoEtoM0JETQOA8kzvZiEjzjdJ CTRujcAJVX7tvSUZQHvRL//uPLck7kdp0EwM4YQKURfX/MUjNxjy3uwofdXIANA363yBdjqEb XWzkRkWbqy3rWEXorBfrfkGy7A8NX1I0V+3cn5NjTNImodY8AC+L7dV0LzFE4zlbh/mrEcb+O 4DSDXQSAp7WC6IbLMkr7Qo4rTLQv2B8DCtfIqLp+m8nmUeWwlU= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > So, that's all. Think how the things can be improved in your side, I know a few possibilities here. > not blaming others. But I know also a few other approaches where higher level development tools help to improve the patch review process in significant ways for trusted system environments. Regards, Markus