Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] pinctrl: Add Xilinx ZynqMP pinctrl driver support

[Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>]

Hi Andy,

On 4/26/21 4:04 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 4:20 PM Sai Krishna Potthuri
> <lakshmis@xilinx.com> wrote:
>>> From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2021 9:24 PM
>>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:31 AM Sai Krishna Potthuri
>>> <lakshmi.sai.krishna.potthuri@xilinx.com> wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>>>> +config PINCTRL_ZYNQMP
>>>> +       tristate "Pinctrl driver for Xilinx ZynqMP"
>>>> +       depends on ZYNQMP_FIRMWARE
>>>> +       select PINMUX
>>>> +       select GENERIC_PINCONF
>>>> +       default ZYNQMP_FIRMWARE
>>>> +       help
>>>> +         This selects the pinctrl driver for Xilinx ZynqMP platform.
>>>> +         This driver will query the pin information from the firmware
>>>> +         and allow configuring the pins.
>>>> +         Configuration can include the mux function to select on those
>>>> +         pin(s)/group(s), and various pin configuration parameters
>>>> +         such as pull-up, slew rate, etc.
>>>
>>> Missed module name.
>> Is this (module name) a configuration option in Kconfig?
> 
> It's a text in a free form that sheds light on how the module will be
> named in case the user will choose "m".

Is this described somewhere in documentation that module name should be
the part of symbol description? I was looking at pinctrl Kconfig and I
can't see any description like this there that's why I want to double
check.

Also if this is a rule checkpatch should be extended to checking this.

Thanks,
Michal