From: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
Silvio Cesare <silvio.cesare@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@broadcom.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] scsi: lpfc: change snprintf to scnprintf for possible overflow
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:27:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d23fb974-2486-a138-4aae-3575f730c4fd@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190320173951.GA27003@kroah.com>
On 3/20/2019 10:39 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 02:41:17PM -0800, James Smart wrote:
>> On 1/14/2019 5:15 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 7:29 AM Willy Tarreau<w@1wt.eu> wrote:
>>>> From: Silvio Cesare<silvio.cesare@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Change snprintf to scnprintf. There are generally two cases where using
>>>> snprintf causes problems.
>>>>
>>>> 1) Uses of size += snprintf(buf, SIZE - size, fmt, ...)
>>>> In this case, if snprintf would have written more characters than what the
>>>> buffer size (SIZE) is, then size will end up larger than SIZE. In later
>>>> uses of snprintf, SIZE - size will result in a negative number, leading
>>>> to problems. Note that size might already be too large by using
>>>> size = snprintf before the code reaches a case of size += snprintf.
>>>>
>>>> 2) If size is ultimately used as a length parameter for a copy back to user
>>>> space, then it will potentially allow for a buffer overflow and information
>>>> disclosure when size is greater than SIZE. When the size is used to index
>>>> the buffer directly, we can have memory corruption. This also means when
>>>> size = snprintf... is used, it may also cause problems since size may become
>>>> large. Copying to userspace is mitigated by the HARDENED_USERCOPY kernel
>>>> configuration.
>>>>
>>>> The solution to these issues is to use scnprintf which returns the number of
>>>> characters actually written to the buffer, so the size variable will never
>>>> exceed SIZE.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Silvio Cesare<silvio.cesare@gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: James Smart<james.smart@broadcom.com>
>>>> Cc: Dick Kennedy<dick.kennedy@broadcom.com>
>>>> Cc: Dan Carpenter<dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>>>> Cc: Kees Cook<keescook@chromium.org>
>>>> Cc: Will Deacon<will.deacon@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Greg KH<greg@kroah.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau<w@1wt.eu>
>>> I think this needs Cc: stable.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook<keescook@chromium.org>
>>>
>>> -Kees
>>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>
> What ever happened to this patch? Did it get dropped somehow?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
I assume it wasn't pulled in by the scsi maintainers. I'll go ping them.
-- james
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-20 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-12 15:28 [PATCH 1/8] lkdtm: change snprintf to scnprintf for possible overflow Willy Tarreau
2019-01-12 15:28 ` [PATCH 2/8] libertas: " Willy Tarreau
2019-01-15 1:09 ` Kees Cook
2019-01-15 5:55 ` Kalle Valo
2019-01-15 20:35 ` Willy Tarreau
2019-01-16 16:40 ` Kalle Valo
2019-01-16 17:02 ` Willy Tarreau
2019-01-12 15:28 ` [PATCH 3/8] ocfs2: " Willy Tarreau
2019-01-15 1:14 ` Kees Cook
2019-01-12 15:28 ` [PATCH 4/8] ASoC: " Willy Tarreau
2019-01-15 1:13 ` Kees Cook
2019-01-15 1:25 ` Nicolin Chen
2019-01-15 3:18 ` Willy Tarreau
2019-01-12 15:28 ` [PATCH 5/8] scsi: lpfc: " Willy Tarreau
2019-01-15 1:15 ` Kees Cook
2019-01-15 22:41 ` James Smart
2019-03-20 17:39 ` Greg KH
2019-03-20 20:27 ` James Smart [this message]
2019-03-21 0:41 ` James Smart
2019-01-12 15:28 ` [PATCH 6/8] ASoC: intel: skylake: " Willy Tarreau
2019-01-15 1:12 ` Kees Cook
2019-01-16 18:41 ` Kees Cook
2019-01-16 19:35 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-16 19:51 ` Kees Cook
2019-01-12 15:28 ` [PATCH 7/8] ASoC: dapm: " Willy Tarreau
2019-01-14 14:56 ` Mark Brown
2019-01-15 3:16 ` Willy Tarreau
2019-01-15 15:44 ` Mark Brown
2019-01-15 15:55 ` Willy Tarreau
2019-01-12 15:28 ` [PATCH 8/8] spi: dw: " Willy Tarreau
2019-01-15 1:09 ` Kees Cook
2019-01-15 1:02 ` [PATCH 1/8] lkdtm: " Kees Cook
2019-01-15 1:07 ` Kees Cook
2019-01-15 3:12 ` Willy Tarreau
2019-01-15 20:47 ` Kees Cook
2019-01-18 13:06 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d23fb974-2486-a138-4aae-3575f730c4fd@broadcom.com \
--to=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=dick.kennedy@broadcom.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=silvio.cesare@gmail.com \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).