linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>,
	<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<hpa@zytor.com>, <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, <hch@lst.de>,
	<mingo@elte.hu>, <jszhang@marvell.com>, <joelaf@google.com>,
	<joaodias@google.com>, <willy@infradead.org>,
	<tglx@linutronix.de>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/vmalloc: allow to call vfree() in atomic context
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 13:31:23 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d28bc808-0aab-d36a-f401-9925680fd131@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170404094148.GJ15132@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On 04/04/2017 12:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 30-03-17 17:48:39, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>> From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
>> Subject: mm/vmalloc: allow to call vfree() in atomic context fix
>>
>> Don't spawn worker if we already purging.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
> 
> I would rather put this into a separate patch. Ideally with some numners
> as this is an optimization...
> 

It's quite simple optimization and don't think that this deserves to be a separate patch.

But I did some measurements though. With enabled VMAP_STACK=y and NR_CACHED_STACK changed to 0
running fork() 100000 times gives this:

With optimization:

~ # grep try_purge /proc/kallsyms 
ffffffff811d0dd0 t try_purge_vmap_area_lazy
~ # perf stat --repeat 10 -ae workqueue:workqueue_queue_work --filter 'function == 0xffffffff811d0dd0' ./fork

 Performance counter stats for 'system wide' (10 runs):

                15      workqueue:workqueue_queue_work                                     ( +-  0.88% )

       1.615368474 seconds time elapsed                                          ( +-  0.41% )


Without optimization:
~ # grep try_purge /proc/kallsyms 
ffffffff811d0dd0 t try_purge_vmap_area_lazy
~ # perf stat --repeat 10 -ae workqueue:workqueue_queue_work --filter 'function == 0xffffffff811d0dd0' ./fork

 Performance counter stats for 'system wide' (10 runs):

                30      workqueue:workqueue_queue_work                                     ( +-  1.31% )

       1.613231060 seconds time elapsed                                          ( +-  0.38% )


So there is no measurable difference on the test itself, but we queue twice more jobs without this optimization.
It should decrease load of kworkers.



>> ---
>>  mm/vmalloc.c | 3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
>> index ea1b4ab..88168b8 100644
>> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
>> @@ -737,7 +737,8 @@ static void free_vmap_area_noflush(struct vmap_area *va)
>>  	/* After this point, we may free va at any time */
>>  	llist_add(&va->purge_list, &vmap_purge_list);
>>  
>> -	if (unlikely(nr_lazy > lazy_max_pages()))
>> +	if (unlikely(nr_lazy > lazy_max_pages()) &&
>> +	    !mutex_is_locked(&vmap_purge_lock))
>>  		schedule_work(&purge_vmap_work);
>>  }
>>  
>> -- 
>> 2.10.2
>>
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-05 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-30 10:27 [PATCH 1/4] mm/vmalloc: allow to call vfree() in atomic context Andrey Ryabinin
2017-03-30 10:27 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/ldt: use vfree() instead of vfree_atomic() Andrey Ryabinin
2017-03-31  8:05   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-30 10:27 ` [PATCH 3/4] kernel/fork: use vfree() instead of vfree_atomic() to free thread stack Andrey Ryabinin
2017-03-30 10:27 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/vmalloc: remove vfree_atomic() Andrey Ryabinin
2017-03-30 17:18   ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-03-30 15:27     ` Andrey Ryabinin
2017-04-04  9:40   ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-30 12:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm/vmalloc: allow to call vfree() in atomic context Thomas Hellstrom
2017-03-30 14:48   ` Andrey Ryabinin
2017-03-30 15:04     ` Thomas Hellstrom
2017-04-04  9:41     ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-04  9:49       ` Thomas Hellstrom
2017-04-05 10:31       ` Andrey Ryabinin [this message]
2017-04-05 10:42         ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-05 11:42     ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-05 12:14       ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-30 22:22 ` Andrew Morton
2017-03-31  7:12   ` Joel Fernandes
2017-03-31  9:26   ` Andrey Ryabinin
2017-04-04  9:36   ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-04  9:38 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-12 12:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Andrey Ryabinin
2017-04-12 12:49   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm/vmalloc: " Andrey Ryabinin
2017-04-12 12:49   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] x86/ldt: use vfree() instead of vfree_atomic() Andrey Ryabinin
2017-04-12 12:49   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] kernel/fork: use vfree() instead of vfree_atomic() to free thread stack Andrey Ryabinin
2017-04-12 12:49   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm/vmalloc: remove vfree_atomic() Andrey Ryabinin
2017-04-12 12:49   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/vmalloc: Don't spawn workers if somebody already purging Andrey Ryabinin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d28bc808-0aab-d36a-f401-9925680fd131@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=joaodias@google.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=jszhang@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thellstrom@vmware.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).