From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>,
qiuxishi@huawei.com, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, memory_hotplug: do not fail offlining too early
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:04:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d29b6788-da1b-23e9-090c-d43428deb97d@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171011065123.e7jvoftmtso3vcha@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 10/11/2017 08:51 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 11-10-17 13:37:50, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> writes:
>>
>>> On Tue 10-10-17 23:05:08, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>>> Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Memory offlining can fail just too eagerly under a heavy memory pressure.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ 5410.336792] page:ffffea22a646bd00 count:255 mapcount:252 mapping:ffff88ff926c9f38 index:0x3
>>>>> [ 5410.336809] flags: 0x9855fe40010048(uptodate|active|mappedtodisk)
>>>>> [ 5410.336811] page dumped because: isolation failed
>>>>> [ 5410.336813] page->mem_cgroup:ffff8801cd662000
>>>>> [ 5420.655030] memory offlining [mem 0x18b580000000-0x18b5ffffffff] failed
>>>>>
>>>>> Isolation has failed here because the page is not on LRU. Most probably
>>>>> because it was on the pcp LRU cache or it has been removed from the LRU
>>>>> already but it hasn't been freed yet. In both cases the page doesn't look
>>>>> non-migrable so retrying more makes sense.
>>>>
>>>> This breaks offline for me.
>>>>
>>>> Prior to this commit:
>>>> /sys/devices/system/memory/memory0# time echo 0 > online
>>>> -bash: echo: write error: Device or resource busy
Well, that means offline didn't actually work for that block even before
this patch, right? Is it even a movable_node block? I guess not?
>>>> real 0m0.001s
>>>> user 0m0.000s
>>>> sys 0m0.001s
>>>>
>>>> After:
>>>> /sys/devices/system/memory/memory0# time echo 0 > online
>>>> -bash: echo: write error: Device or resource busy
>>>>
>>>> real 2m0.009s
>>>> user 0m0.000s
>>>> sys 1m25.035s
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There's no way that block can be removed, it contains the kernel text,
>>>> so it should instantly fail - which it used to.
Ah, right. So your complain is really about that the failure is not
instant anymore for blocks that can't be offlined.
>>> OK, that means that start_isolate_page_range should have failed but it
>>> hasn't for some reason. I strongly suspect has_unmovable_pages is doing
>>> something wrong. Is the kernel text marked somehow? E.g. PageReserved?
>>
>> I'm not sure how the text is marked, will have to dig into that.
>>
>>> In other words, does the diff below helps?
>>
>> No that doesn't help.
>
> This is really strange! As you write in other email the page is
> reserved. That means that some of the earlier checks
> if (zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_MOVABLE)
> return false;
> mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
> if (mt == MIGRATE_MOVABLE || is_migrate_cma(mt))
The MIGRATE_MOVABLE check is indeed bogus, because that doesn't
guarantee there are no unmovable pages in the block (CMA block OTOH
should be a guarantee).
> return false;
> has bailed out early. I would be quite surprised if the kernel text was
> sitting in the zone movable. The migrate type check is more fishy
> AFAICS. I can imagine that the kernel text can share the movable or CMA
> mt block. I am not really familiar with this function but it looks
> suspicious. So does it help to remove this check?
> ---
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 3badcedf96a7..5b4d85ae445c 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -7355,9 +7355,6 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
> */
> if (zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_MOVABLE)
> return false;
> - mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
> - if (mt == MIGRATE_MOVABLE || is_migrate_cma(mt))
> - return false;
>
> pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> for (found = 0, iter = 0; iter < pageblock_nr_pages; iter++) {
> @@ -7368,6 +7365,9 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
>
> page = pfn_to_page(check);
>
> + if (PageReserved(page))
> + return true;
> +
> /*
> * Hugepages are not in LRU lists, but they're movable.
> * We need not scan over tail pages bacause we don't
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-11 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-18 7:08 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm, memory_hotplug: redefine memory offline retry logic Michal Hocko
2017-09-18 7:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm, memory_hotplug: do not fail offlining too early Michal Hocko
2017-10-10 12:05 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-10-10 12:27 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-11 2:37 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-10-11 5:19 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-10-11 14:05 ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-10-11 14:16 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-11 6:51 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-11 8:04 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2017-10-11 8:13 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-11 11:17 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-10-11 11:24 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-13 11:42 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-10-13 11:58 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-13 12:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: drop migrate type checks from has_unmovable_pages Michal Hocko
2017-10-13 12:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm, page_alloc: fail has_unmovable_pages when seeing reserved pages Michal Hocko
2017-10-13 12:04 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-10-13 12:07 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-17 13:03 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-10-17 11:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: drop migrate type checks from has_unmovable_pages Michael Ellerman
2017-10-17 12:03 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-17 13:02 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-10-19 2:51 ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-10-19 7:15 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-19 7:33 ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-10-19 8:20 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-19 12:21 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-20 2:13 ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-10-20 5:59 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-20 6:50 ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-10-20 7:02 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-23 5:23 ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-10-23 8:10 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-24 4:44 ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-10-24 7:44 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-24 8:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-10-24 12:25 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-26 2:47 ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-10-26 7:41 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-20 7:22 ` Xishi Qiu
2017-10-20 8:17 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-23 5:26 ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-10-26 13:04 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-10-26 13:59 ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-18 7:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm, memory_hotplug: remove timeout from __offline_memory Michal Hocko
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-09-04 8:21 [PATCH 0/2] mm, memory_hotplug: redefine memory offline retry logic Michal Hocko
2017-09-04 8:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm, memory_hotplug: do not fail offlining too early Michal Hocko
2017-09-05 6:29 ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-09-05 7:13 ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-08 17:26 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-09-11 8:17 ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-13 11:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-09-13 12:10 ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-13 12:14 ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-13 12:19 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-09-13 12:32 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d29b6788-da1b-23e9-090c-d43428deb97d@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).