From: sbhanu@codeaurora.org
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: adrian.hunter@intel.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
ulf.hansson@linaro.org, asutoshd@codeaurora.org,
stummala@codeaurora.org, vbadigan@codeaurora.org,
rampraka@codeaurora.org, sayalil@codeaurora.org,
sartgarg@codeaurora.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org,
saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org, sibis@codeaurora.org,
okukatla@codeaurora.org, djakov@kernel.org, cang@codeaurora.org,
pragalla@codeaurora.org, nitirawa@codeaurora.org,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add nodes for eMMC and SD card
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 12:51:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3322b244221be7cb4802d6448c7588c@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE-0n52KyStCcQ1QPFJBUvrTVB-NuBcQ9qnPhnzQj6PFiXPLGg@mail.gmail.com>
On 2021-06-23 01:47, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Shaik Sajida Bhanu (2021-06-16 02:23:01)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dts
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dts
>> index 3900cfc..0f63cac 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dts
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>> #include <dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-adc7-pmr735b.h>
>> #include <dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-adc7-pm8350.h>
>> #include <dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-adc7-pmk8350.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>
> The letter g comes before i, please move this higher in the list.
Sure i will adrress this in my next patchset.
>
>> #include "sc7280.dtsi"
>> #include "pm7325.dtsi"
>> #include "pmr735a.dtsi"
>> @@ -272,6 +273,34 @@
>> status = "okay";
>> };
>>
>> +&sdhc_1 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> +
>> + pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdc1_on>;
>> + pinctrl-1 = <&sdc1_off>;
>> +
>> + non-removable;
>> + no-sd;
>> + no-sdio;
>> +
>> + vmmc-supply = <&vreg_l7b_2p9>;
>> + vqmmc-supply = <&vreg_l19b_1p8>;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&sdhc_2 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> +
>> + pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdc2_on>;
>> + pinctrl-1 = <&sdc2_off>;
>> +
>> + vmmc-supply = <&vreg_l9c_2p9>;
>> + vqmmc-supply = <&vreg_l6c_2p9>;
>> +
>> + cd-gpios = <&tlmm 91 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> +};
>> +
>> &uart5 {
>> status = "okay";
>> };
>> @@ -291,3 +320,55 @@
>> bias-pull-up;
>> };
>> };
>> +
>> +&tlmm {
>> + sdc1_on: sdc1-on {
>> + clk {
>> + pins = "sdc1_clk";
>
> Can the pins property at least be moved into sc7280.dtsi? Then this can
> add bias and drive strength overrides in the board file?
Sure i will adrress this in my next patchset.
>
>> + bias-disable;
>> + drive-strength = <16>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + cmd {
>> + pins = "sdc1_cmd";
>> + bias-pull-up;
>> + drive-strength = <10>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + data {
>> + pins = "sdc1_data";
>> + bias-pull-up;
>> + drive-strength = <10>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + rclk {
>> + pins = "sdc1_rclk";
>> + bias-pull-down;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + sdc2_on: sdc2-on {
>> + clk {
>> + pins = "sdc2_clk";
>> + bias-disable;
>> + drive-strength = <16>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + cmd {
>> + pins = "sdc2_cmd";
>> + bias-pull-up;
>> + drive-strength = <10>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + data {
>> + pins = "sdc2_data";
>> + bias-pull-up;
>> + drive-strength = <10>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sd-cd {
>> + pins = "gpio91";
>> + bias-pull-up;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +};
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> index d600bca..16d8e17 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> @@ -974,6 +1033,51 @@
>> };
>> };
>>
>> + sdhc_2: sdhci@8804000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,sc7280-sdhci",
>> "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5";
>> + status = "disabled";
>> +
>> + reg = <0 0x08804000 0 0x1000>;
>> +
>> + iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x100 0x0>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 207
>> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> + <GIC_SPI 223
>> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + interrupt-names = "hc_irq", "pwr_irq";
>> +
>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC2_APPS_CLK>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_SDCC2_AHB_CLK>,
>> + <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
>> + clock-names = "core", "iface", "xo";
>> + interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_SDCC_2 0
>> &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 0>,
>> + <&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC 0
>> &cnoc2 SLAVE_SDCC_2 0>;
>> + interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc";
>> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7280_CX>;
>> + operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc2_opp_table>;
>> +
>> + bus-width = <4>;
>> +
>> + qcom,dll-config = <0x0007642c>;
>> +
>> + sdhc2_opp_table: sdhc2-opp-table {
>
> Any reason the node shouldn't be called opp-table?
Yes, it can be called but for consistency, we are using the same node
names as that on sc7180.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-24 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-16 9:23 [PATCH V4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add nodes for eMMC and SD card Shaik Sajida Bhanu
2021-06-22 20:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-06-24 7:21 ` sbhanu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d3322b244221be7cb4802d6448c7588c@codeaurora.org \
--to=sbhanu@codeaurora.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=djakov@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nitirawa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=okukatla@codeaurora.org \
--cc=pragalla@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rampraka@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sartgarg@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sayalil@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sibis@codeaurora.org \
--cc=stummala@codeaurora.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vbadigan@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).