From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752891AbdLANOx (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2017 08:14:53 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:17906 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752745AbdLANOK (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2017 08:14:10 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,344,1508828400"; d="scan'208";a="8003502" Subject: Re: [PATCH V15 00/22] mmc: Add Command Queue support To: Ulf Hansson Cc: linux-mmc , linux-block , linux-kernel , Bough Chen , Alex Lemberg , Mateusz Nowak , Yuliy Izrailov , Jaehoon Chung , Dong Aisheng , Das Asutosh , Zhangfei Gao , Sahitya Tummala , Harjani Ritesh , Venu Byravarasu , Linus Walleij , Shawn Lin , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Christoph Hellwig References: <1511962879-24262-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> From: Adrian Hunter Organization: Intel Finland Oy, Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki, Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4, Domiciled in Helsinki Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 15:13:46 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29/11/17 17:47, Ulf Hansson wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > On 29 November 2017 at 14:40, Adrian Hunter wrote: >> Hi >> >> Here is V15 of the hardware command queue patches without the software >> command queue patches, now using blk-mq and now with blk-mq support for >> non-CQE I/O. > > I have applied patches 1->19 for next. Deferring patch 21->23 for a while. Thank you! > > For those patches that was more or less the same as in v14, I added Linus' ack. > > Hopefully we get some help for the community to test this series on > different HW (and I will be checking kernelci's boot reports). I > haven't added Bartlomiej's tested-by and neither Linus' (because of > the changes that has been made), so I hoping that will happen sooner > or later. > > Moreover, I will gladly add more peoples acks/reviewed-by and > tested-by tags, at any point during this release cycle. I also encourage anyone testing to report their results even if they don't want to have a tested-by tag.