From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764438AbdDSOWv (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:22:51 -0400 Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr ([93.17.236.30]:13303 "EHLO pegase1.c-s.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763240AbdDSOWs (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:22:48 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/mm: Implement CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA on PPC32 To: Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Scott Wood References: <87inm05we4.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org From: Christophe LEROY Message-ID: Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:22:46 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87inm05we4.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 19/04/2017 à 16:01, Michael Ellerman a écrit : > Christophe Leroy writes: > >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c >> index 32509de6ce4c..4af81fb23653 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c >> @@ -526,7 +526,9 @@ void ftrace_replace_code(int enable) >> */ >> void arch_ftrace_update_code(int command) >> { >> + set_kernel_text_rw(); >> ftrace_modify_all_code(command); >> + set_kernel_text_ro(); >> } > > I'm not sure that's the right place for that. I took arch/arm/ as model. It does the following. Is that wrong ? static int __ftrace_modify_code(void *data) { int *command = data; set_kernel_text_rw(); ftrace_modify_all_code(*command); set_kernel_text_ro(); return 0; } void arch_ftrace_update_code(int command) { stop_machine(__ftrace_modify_code, &command, NULL); } > If you look at other arches they hook into ftrace_modify_code(), where > you have the address that's being modified. > Ok, I will look at other arches. Christophe