From: "Xu, Like" <like.xu@intel.com>
To: Liuxiangdong <liuxiangdong5@huawei.com>
Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, kan.liang@linux.intel.com,
wei.w.wang@intel.com, eranian@google.com,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Fangyi (Eric)" <eric.fangyi@huawei.com>,
Xiexiangyou <xiexiangyou@huawei.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/16] KVM: x86: Set PEBS_UNAVAIL in IA32_MISC_ENABLE when PEBS is enabled
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 16:41:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3bd9986-4cd9-c178-f288-038fb02d286f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <607E911C.4090706@huawei.com>
On 2021/4/20 16:30, Liuxiangdong wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/4/15 11:20, Like Xu wrote:
>> The bit 12 represents "Processor Event Based Sampling Unavailable (RO)" :
>> 1 = PEBS is not supported.
>> 0 = PEBS is supported.
>>
>> A write to this PEBS_UNAVL available bit will bring #GP(0) when guest PEBS
>> is enabled. Some PEBS drivers in guest may care about this bit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 2 ++
>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++++
>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
>> index 58f32a55cc2e..c846d3eef7a7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
>> @@ -588,6 +588,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> bitmap_set(pmu->all_valid_pmc_idx, INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_VLBR, 1);
>> if (vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities & PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT) {
>> + vcpu->arch.ia32_misc_enable_msr &=
>> ~MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_PEBS_UNAVAIL;
>> if (vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities & PERF_CAP_PEBS_BASELINE) {
>> pmu->pebs_enable_mask = ~pmu->global_ctrl;
>> pmu->reserved_bits &= ~ICL_EVENTSEL_ADAPTIVE;
>> @@ -597,6 +598,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> }
>> pmu->pebs_data_cfg_mask = ~0xff00000full;
>> } else {
>> + vcpu->arch.ia32_misc_enable_msr |=
>> MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_PEBS_UNAVAIL;
>> pmu->pebs_enable_mask =
>> ~((1ull << pmu->nr_arch_gp_counters) - 1);
>> }
>
> I guess what we want is
>
> if (vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities & PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT) {
> vcpu->arch.ia32_misc_enable_msr &=
> ~MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_PEBS_UNAVAIL;
> if (vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities & PERF_CAP_PEBS_BASELINE) {
> pmu->pebs_enable_mask = ~pmu->global_ctrl;
> pmu->reserved_bits &= ~ICL_EVENTSEL_ADAPTIVE;
> for (i = 0; i < pmu->nr_arch_fixed_counters; i++) {
> pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl_mask &=
> ~(1ULL << (INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED + i
> * 4));
> }
> pmu->pebs_data_cfg_mask = ~0xff00000full;
> } else {
> pmu->pebs_enable_mask =
> ~((1ull << pmu->nr_arch_gp_counters) - 1);
> }
> } else {
> vcpu->arch.ia32_misc_enable_msr |=
> MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_PEBS_UNAVAIL;
> vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities &= ~PERF_CAP_PEBS_MASK;
> }
>
>
> But here is
>
> if (vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities & PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT) {
> vcpu->arch.ia32_misc_enable_msr &=
> ~MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_PEBS_UNAVAIL;
> if (vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities & PERF_CAP_PEBS_BASELINE) {
> pmu->pebs_enable_mask = ~pmu->global_ctrl;
> pmu->reserved_bits &= ~ICL_EVENTSEL_ADAPTIVE;
> for (i = 0; i < pmu->nr_arch_fixed_counters; i++) {
> pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl_mask &=
> ~(1ULL << (INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED + i
> * 4));
> }
> pmu->pebs_data_cfg_mask = ~0xff00000full;
> } else {
> vcpu->arch.ia32_misc_enable_msr |=
> MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_PEBS_UNAVAIL;
You got me. The v5 is wrong here but v4 is right.
Please let me know if you have more comments on this version.
> pmu->pebs_enable_mask =
> ~((1ull << pmu->nr_arch_gp_counters) - 1);
> }
> } else {
> vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities &= ~PERF_CAP_PEBS_MASK;
> }
>
>
> Wrong else branch?
>
>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index 1a64e816e06d..ed38f1dada63 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -3126,6 +3126,10 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> struct msr_data *msr_info)
>> break;
>> case MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE:
>> data &= ~MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_EMON;
>> + if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
>> + (vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities & PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT) &&
>> + (data & MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_PEBS_UNAVAIL))
>> + return 1;
>> if (!kvm_check_has_quirk(vcpu->kvm,
>> KVM_X86_QUIRK_MISC_ENABLE_NO_MWAIT) &&
>> ((vcpu->arch.ia32_misc_enable_msr ^ data) &
>> MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_MWAIT)) {
>> if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XMM3))
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-20 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-15 3:20 [PATCH v5 00/16] KVM: x86/pmu: Add basic support to enable guest PEBS via DS Like Xu
2021-04-15 3:20 ` [PATCH v5 01/16] perf/x86/intel: Add EPT-Friendly PEBS for Ice Lake Server Like Xu
2021-04-15 3:20 ` [PATCH v5 02/16] perf/x86/intel: Handle guest PEBS overflow PMI for KVM guest Like Xu
2021-04-15 3:20 ` [PATCH v5 03/16] perf/x86/core: Pass "struct kvm_pmu *" to determine the guest values Like Xu
2021-04-15 3:20 ` [PATCH v5 04/16] KVM: x86/pmu: Set MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_EMON bit when vPMU is enabled Like Xu
2021-04-15 3:20 ` [PATCH v5 05/16] KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce the ctrl_mask value for fixed counter Like Xu
2021-04-15 3:20 ` [PATCH v5 06/16] KVM: x86/pmu: Reprogram PEBS event to emulate guest PEBS counter Like Xu
2021-04-19 8:11 ` Liuxiangdong
2021-04-19 8:17 ` Xu, Like
2021-04-15 3:20 ` [PATCH v5 07/16] KVM: x86/pmu: Add IA32_PEBS_ENABLE MSR emulation for extended PEBS Like Xu
2021-04-15 3:20 ` [PATCH v5 08/16] KVM: x86/pmu: Add IA32_DS_AREA MSR emulation to support guest DS Like Xu
2021-04-15 3:20 ` [PATCH v5 09/16] KVM: x86/pmu: Add PEBS_DATA_CFG MSR emulation to support adaptive PEBS Like Xu
2021-04-15 3:20 ` [PATCH v5 10/16] KVM: x86: Set PEBS_UNAVAIL in IA32_MISC_ENABLE when PEBS is enabled Like Xu
2021-04-20 8:30 ` Liuxiangdong
2021-04-20 8:41 ` Xu, Like [this message]
2021-04-15 3:20 ` [PATCH v5 11/16] KVM: x86/pmu: Adjust precise_ip to emulate Ice Lake guest PDIR counter Like Xu
2021-04-15 3:20 ` [PATCH v5 12/16] KVM: x86/pmu: Move pmc_speculative_in_use() to arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h Like Xu
2021-04-15 3:20 ` [PATCH v5 13/16] KVM: x86/pmu: Disable guest PEBS temporarily in two rare situations Like Xu
2021-04-15 3:20 ` [PATCH v5 14/16] KVM: x86/pmu: Add kvm_pmu_cap to optimize perf_get_x86_pmu_capability Like Xu
2021-04-15 3:20 ` [PATCH v5 15/16] KVM: x86/cpuid: Refactor host/guest CPU model consistency check Like Xu
2021-04-15 3:20 ` [PATCH v5 16/16] KVM: x86/pmu: Expose CPUIDs feature bits PDCM, DS, DTES64 Like Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d3bd9986-4cd9-c178-f288-038fb02d286f@intel.com \
--to=like.xu@intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=eric.fangyi@huawei.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuxiangdong5@huawei.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiexiangyou@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).