From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 17:13:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 17:13:25 -0400 Received: from smtp3.cern.ch ([137.138.131.164]:36819 "EHLO smtp3.cern.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 17:13:21 -0400 To: "David S. Miller" Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.9 does not compile [PATCH] In-Reply-To: <20010816.154858.63131116.davem@redhat.com> From: Jes Sorensen Date: 17 Aug 2001 23:12:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: "David S. Miller"'s message of "Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:48:58 -0700 (PDT)" Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "David" == David S Miller writes: David> From: Alan Cox Date: Thu, 16 Aug David> 2001 23:41:07 +0100 (BST) > Thank you for your detailed discussion of this in advance on > the kernel list, your careful consideration of the 2.2 > compatibility work horrors you introduced and the thoughtful > way you notified maintainers. David> Listen: David> 1) All of this was done at the request of Linus. David> 2) You were CC:'d on every single email that Linus and I had on David> these changes, and you saw every single revision of the patch. Alan's point about CC'ing maintainers still stands, where was the CC to the individual maintainers of the code you changed? Jes