linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kasan: distinguish kasan report from generic BUG()
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 19:04:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d42117da-f6a4-053b-c498-5686cc06aca4@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2111241839590.16505@cbobk.fhfr.pm>

On 24. 11. 21, 18:41, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
> 
> The typical KASAN report always begins with
> 
> 	BUG: KASAN: ....
> 
> in kernel log. That 'BUG:' prefix creates a false impression that it's an
> actual BUG() codepath being executed, and as such things like
> 'panic_on_oops' etc. would work on it as expected; but that's obviously
> not the case.
> 
> Switch the order of prefixes to make this distinction clear and avoid
> confusion.

Thinking about it more in the scope of panic_on_oops above: wouldn't it 
make more sense to emit "KASAN: WARNING:" instead? All that provided the 
fact the code explicitly does "if (panic_on_warn) { panic(); }"?

> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
> ---
>   mm/kasan/report.c | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/report.c b/mm/kasan/report.c
> index 0bc10f452f7e..ead714c844e9 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/report.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/report.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ __setup("kasan_multi_shot", kasan_set_multi_shot);
>   
>   static void print_error_description(struct kasan_access_info *info)
>   {
> -	pr_err("BUG: KASAN: %s in %pS\n",
> +	pr_err("KASAN: BUG: %s in %pS\n",
>   		kasan_get_bug_type(info), (void *)info->ip);
>   	if (info->access_size)
>   		pr_err("%s of size %zu at addr %px by task %s/%d\n",
> @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ void kasan_report_invalid_free(void *object, unsigned long ip)
>   #endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT) */
>   
>   	start_report(&flags);
> -	pr_err("BUG: KASAN: double-free or invalid-free in %pS\n", (void *)ip);
> +	pr_err("KASAN: BUG: double-free or invalid-free in %pS\n", (void *)ip);
>   	kasan_print_tags(tag, object);
>   	pr_err("\n");
>   	print_address_description(object, tag);
> @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ void kasan_report_async(void)
>   #endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT) */
>   
>   	start_report(&flags);
> -	pr_err("BUG: KASAN: invalid-access\n");
> +	pr_err("KASAN: BUG: invalid-access\n");
>   	pr_err("Asynchronous mode enabled: no access details available\n");
>   	pr_err("\n");
>   	dump_stack_lvl(KERN_ERR);
> 
> 


-- 
js
suse labs

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-24 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-24 17:41 [PATCH] kasan: distinguish kasan report from generic BUG() Jiri Kosina
2021-11-24 18:04 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2021-11-24 18:06 ` Marco Elver
2021-11-25  7:15   ` Dmitry Vyukov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d42117da-f6a4-053b-c498-5686cc06aca4@kernel.org \
    --to=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).