From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cohuck@redhat.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
jjherne@linux.ibm.com, jgg@nvidia.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@stny.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] s390/vfio-ap: fix memory leak in mdev remove callback
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 20:22:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d426bb7e-39d8-6eaf-047e-05eb70cdaeb7@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00c86767-ce8b-7050-f665-75f33fabe118@linux.ibm.com>
On 18.05.21 20:14, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>
>
> On 5/18/21 9:59 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 18.05.21 15:42, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/18/21 5:30 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 17.05.21 21:10, Halil Pasic wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 17 May 2021 09:37:42 -0400
>>>>> Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because of this, I don't think the rest of your argument is valid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Okay, so your concern is that between the point in time the
>>>>>> vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook pointer is checked in
>>>>>> priv.c and the point in time the handle_pqap() function
>>>>>> in vfio_ap_ops.c is called, the memory allocated for the
>>>>>> matrix_mdev containing the struct kvm_s390_module_hook
>>>>>> may get freed, thus rendering the function pointer invalid.
>>>>>> While not impossible, that seems extremely unlikely to
>>>>>> happen. Can you articulate a scenario where that could
>>>>>> even occur?
>>>>>
>>>>> Malicious userspace. We tend to do the pqap aqic just once
>>>>> in the guest right after the queue is detected. I do agree
>>>>> it ain't very likely to happen during normal operation. But why are
>>>>> you asking?
>>>>
>>>> Would it help, if the code in priv.c would read the hook once
>>>> and then only work on the copy? We could protect that with rcu
>>>> and do a synchronize rcu in vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm after
>>>> unsetting the pointer?
>>>
>>> I'll look into this.
>>
>> I think it could work. in priv.c use rcu_readlock, save the
>> pointer, do the check and call, call rcu_read_unlock.
>> In vfio_ap use rcu_assign_pointer to set the pointer and
>> after setting it to zero call sychronize_rcu.
>>
>> Halil, I think we can do this as an addon patch as it makes
>> sense to have this callback pointer protected independent of
>> this patch. Agree?
>
> I agree that this is a viable option; however, this does not
> guarantee that the matrix_mdev is not freed thus rendering
> the function pointer to the interception handler invalid unless
> that is also included within the rcu_readlock/rcu_read_unlock.
The trick should be the sychronize_rcu. This will put the deleting
code (vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm) to sleep until the rcu read section
has finished. So if you first set the pointer to zero, then call
synchronize_rcu the code will only progress until all users of
the old poiner have finished.
> That is not possible given the matrix_mdev is freed within
> the remove callback and the pointer to the structure that
> contains the interception handler function pointer is cleared
> in the vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm() function. I am working on
> a patch and should be able to post it before EOD or first thing
> tomorrow.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-18 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-10 21:48 [PATCH v2] s390/vfio-ap: fix memory leak in mdev remove callback Tony Krowiak
2021-05-10 21:56 ` Tony Krowiak
2021-05-12 10:35 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-05-12 12:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-12 15:32 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-05-12 16:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-13 14:19 ` Tony Krowiak
2021-05-13 14:18 ` Tony Krowiak
2021-05-13 17:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-13 17:32 ` Halil Pasic
2021-05-13 17:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-12 16:49 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-05-12 18:35 ` Halil Pasic
2021-05-13 14:35 ` Tony Krowiak
2021-05-13 17:45 ` Halil Pasic
2021-05-13 19:23 ` Tony Krowiak
2021-05-14 0:15 ` Halil Pasic
2021-05-17 13:37 ` Tony Krowiak
2021-05-17 19:10 ` Halil Pasic
2021-05-18 9:30 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-05-18 13:42 ` Tony Krowiak
2021-05-18 13:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-05-18 15:33 ` Halil Pasic
2021-05-18 17:01 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-05-18 23:27 ` Halil Pasic
2021-05-19 8:17 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-05-19 11:22 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-05-19 12:59 ` Halil Pasic
2021-05-19 13:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-19 11:25 ` Halil Pasic
2021-05-18 18:14 ` Tony Krowiak
2021-05-18 18:22 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2021-05-18 18:40 ` Tony Krowiak
2021-05-18 13:41 ` Tony Krowiak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d426bb7e-39d8-6eaf-047e-05eb70cdaeb7@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akrowiak@stny.rr.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).