From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B42D1C19759 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 06:13:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 680EA206A3 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 06:13:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729401AbfHAGNP (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2019 02:13:15 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:58710 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726783AbfHAGNO (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2019 02:13:14 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10555337; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 23:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.163.1.81] (unknown [10.163.1.81]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7AE53F694; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 23:15:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/21] mm: Add generic p?d_leaf() macros To: Mark Rutland Cc: Steven Price , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andy Lutomirski , Ard Biesheuvel , Arnd Bergmann , Borislav Petkov , Catalin Marinas , Dave Hansen , Ingo Molnar , James Morse , =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Will Deacon , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Liang, Kan" , Andrew Morton References: <20190722154210.42799-1-steven.price@arm.com> <20190722154210.42799-11-steven.price@arm.com> <20190723094113.GA8085@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> <20190729125013.GA33794@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> From: Anshuman Khandual Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 11:43:38 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190729125013.GA33794@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/29/2019 06:20 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 05:14:31PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> On 07/23/2019 03:11 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: >>> It might also be worth pointing out the reasons for this naming, e.g. >>> p?d_large() aren't currently generic, and this name minimizes potential >>> confusion between p?d_{large,huge}(). >> >> Agreed. But these fallback also need to first check non-availability of large >> pages. > > We're deliberately not making the p?d_large() helpers generic, so this > shouldn't fall back on those. I meant non-availability of large page support in the MMU HW not just the presence of p?d_large() helpers.