From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA8FC49ED7 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 06:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BE82089F for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 06:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=rasmusvillemoes.dk header.i=@rasmusvillemoes.dk header.b="gdiYDH2B" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728080AbfIMGL3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2019 02:11:29 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f68.google.com ([209.85.167.68]:45748 "EHLO mail-lf1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727816AbfIMGL3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2019 02:11:29 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f68.google.com with SMTP id r134so21189618lff.12 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 23:11:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rasmusvillemoes.dk; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=R/K1vQUHZEwV1W95kV0s91z3Z0oEdJdKOjyfPcHhkNw=; b=gdiYDH2BdkgR+dq3uVZ40rAx3LUdqoBEZVZJkQZJcDCcI4Rn7xiEubzH9WdB9U/Wmu +cXy/4/W3FjcYNvuhMy+MgiiVgK060L8LnzLXykmy/ejqAegnDrX8XAsxrxTosclLiGn uTzgE04lMvx7TGAKCPwAQYkT0DpziVFcGxuLU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=R/K1vQUHZEwV1W95kV0s91z3Z0oEdJdKOjyfPcHhkNw=; b=tOwWbFyvo4kBuPJyzYl1LtU9crUOfucT/vTEKC1dRNz3xIxXwp68754ihiHDotssx5 zRpJW85Z5AtRk25szNQeP1cG/yFmeEtT5p0mZYvjwM/5WHQHHFULCsK3yEvAzl6xBBoo fHjzBc3Ew8A1KCYX9933IjPpldOYA6x0FTqdZem8ScdrGrhp18ByJqj5ez9CGzBIEWL+ 3o7akfLOeFA5gOta+JZFHnQTGFD0h9D8HOwbu69SLGUNMhNiQN9wVQ7BC4ThFMbkfJWb aUkQZLwR7WUaooLIW9RXwacLYwVgt1mku45uxsnIMl6GojKBMogZx+73IVA4NZRcntkz dLQg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV11qITnBMIm0z0ZadWNjFdvFFRju0d0C18dwLU7pxeL7lpoFo2 kRq3262Dt0hftT/TRvL1khiw3wGe/v/Y/Rk0 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy7FyZ4U44Jbx/pb8pLaVSQTSWwaUMPzp8ugSZPfTNcig3dznvvpzORMdtTDKSp1khqDLNmFQ== X-Received: by 2002:a19:4bd7:: with SMTP id y206mr4426716lfa.9.1568355086349; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 23:11:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.11.28] ([81.216.59.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r27sm6000064ljn.60.2019.09.12.23.11.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Sep 2019 23:11:25 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] make use of gcc 9's "asm inline()" To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: Nick Desaulniers , Masahiro Yamada , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Nadav Amit , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , linux-kernel , Borislav Petkov References: <20190830231527.22304-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <20190912221927.18641-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> From: Rasmus Villemoes Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:11:24 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13/09/2019 00.30, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:19 AM Rasmus Villemoes > wrote: >> >> Patch 1 has already been picked up by Greg in staging-next, it's >> included here for completeness. I don't know how to route the rest, or >> if they should simply wait for 5.5 given how close we are to the merge >> window for 5.4. > > If you want I can pick this up in compiler-attributes and submit it as > a whole if we get Acks from rtl8723bs/x86/...maintainers. Ingo has now acked the x86 parts, and Greg has already picked up the rtl8723bs patch, which is at least an implicit ack. I'm just unsure of how and if it will work if you also pick up that one - but, if you don't, your tree would be (somewhat) dependent on Greg's staging-next :( Rasmus