From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD270C2D0CE for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 09:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949122070A for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 09:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729459AbgAXJce (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 04:32:34 -0500 Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:45784 "EHLO www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725821AbgAXJcd (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 04:32:33 -0500 Received: from sslproxy03.your-server.de ([88.198.220.132]) by www62.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iuvKG-0006Dq-UV; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:32:29 +0100 Received: from [2001:1620:665:0:5795:5b0a:e5d5:5944] (helo=linux-3.fritz.box) by sslproxy03.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iuvKG-000Bp8-I2; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:32:28 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 2/4] selftests: bpf: ignore RST packets for reuseport tests To: Lorenz Bauer , Martin Lau Cc: Shuah Khan , Alexei Starovoitov , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Andrii Nakryiko , "linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "bpf@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <20200123165934.9584-1-lmb@cloudflare.com> <20200123165934.9584-3-lmb@cloudflare.com> <20200123215348.zql3d5xpg2if7v6q@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> From: Daniel Borkmann Message-ID: Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:32:27 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: daniel@iogearbox.net X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.101.4/25704/Thu Jan 23 12:37:43 2020) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/24/20 10:00 AM, Lorenz Bauer wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 21:54, Martin Lau wrote: >> >> btw, it needs a Fixes tag. >> >> Patch 4 and Patch 1 also need a Fixes tag. > > This makes me wonder, should these go via bpf or bpf-next? Do I have > to split the series then? Lets do all of these for bpf-next since timing is very close before v5.5 release. If needed, we can later have them picked up for 5.5 stable. Thanks, Daniel