linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs: Explain the desired position of function attributes
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 18:16:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6472a0e635941de55b83ba2ec3e673a74a123b6.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210930192417.1332877-1-keescook@chromium.org>

On Thu, 2021-09-30 at 12:24 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> While discussing how to format the addition of various function
> attributes, some "unwritten rules" of ordering surfaced[1]. Capture as
> close as possible to Linus's preferences for future reference.
> 
> (Though I note the dissent voiced by Joe Perches, Alexey Dobriyan, and
> others that would prefer all attributes live on a separate leading line.)
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/CAHk-=wiOCLRny5aifWNhr621kYrJwhfURsa0vFPeUEm8mF0ufg@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/process/coding-style.rst | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
> index 42969ab37b34..6b4feb1c71e7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
> @@ -487,6 +487,36 @@ because it is a simple way to add valuable information for the reader.
>  Do not use the ``extern`` keyword with function prototypes as this makes
>  lines longer and isn't strictly necessary.
>  
> 
> +When writing a function declarations, please keep the `order of elements regular
> +<https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/CAHk-=wiOCLRny5aifWNhr621kYrJwhfURsa0vFPeUEm8mF0ufg@mail.gmail.com/>`_.
> +For example::
> +
> + extern __init void * __must_check void action(enum magic value, size_t size,
> + 	u8 count, char *fmt, ...) __printf(4, 5) __malloc;
> +

Read the paragraph above.  extern should not be used in an example.

> +The preferred order of elements for a function prototype is:
> +
> +- storage class (here, ``extern``, and things like ``static __always_inline`` even though
> +  ``__always_inline`` is technically an attribute, it is treated like ``inline``)
> +- storage class attributes (here, ``__init`` -- i.e. section declarations, but also things like ``__cold``)
> +- return type (here, ``void *``)
> +- return type attributes (here, ``__must_check``)
> +- function name (here, ``action``)
> +- function parameters (here, ``(enum magic value, size_t size, u8 count, char *fmt, ...)``, noting that parameter names should always be included)
> +- function parameter attributes (here, ``__printf(4, 5)``)
> +- function behavior attributes (here, ``__malloc``)
> +
> +Note that for a function definition (e.g. ``static inline``), the compiler does
> +not allow function parameter attributes after the function parameters. In these
> +cases, they should go after the storage class attributes (e.g. note the changed
> +position of ``__printf(4, 5)``)::
> +
> + static __always_inline __init __printf(4, 5) void * __must_check void action(
> + 		enum magic value, size_t size, u8 count, char *fmt, ...)
> + 		__malloc
> + {
> + 	...
> + }
>  
> 
>  7) Centralized exiting of functions
>  -----------------------------------



      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-01  1:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-30 19:24 [PATCH v2] docs: Explain the desired position of function attributes Kees Cook
2021-09-30 20:11 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-09-30 22:52   ` Kees Cook
2021-10-01  2:54     ` Joe Perches
2021-10-01  1:16 ` Joe Perches [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d6472a0e635941de55b83ba2ec3e673a74a123b6.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).