From: Guido Kiener <Guido.Kiener@rohde-schwarz.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
dave penkler <dpenkler@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+e2eae5639e7203360018@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"lee.jones@linaro.org" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"dwmw@amazon.co.uk" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com"
<syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [syzbot] INFO: rcu detected stall in tx
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 16:14:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d673611ca53f42a3a629eb051cabc6eb@rohde-schwarz.com> (raw)
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:48:29AM +0200, dave penkler wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 16:29, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 10:14:41AM +0200, dave penkler wrote:
> > > > When the host driver detects a protocol error while processing an
> > > > URB it completes the URB with EPROTO status and marks the endpoint
> > > > as halted.
> > >
> > > Not true. It does not mark the endpoint as halted, not unless it
> > > receives a STALL handshake from the device. A STALL is not a
> > > protocol error.
> > >
> > > > When the class driver resubmits the URB and the if the host driver
> > > > finds the endpoint still marked as halted it should return EPIPE
> > > > status on the resubmitted URB
> > >
> > > Irrelevant.
> > Not at all. The point is that when an application is talking to an
> > instrument over the usbtmc driver, the underlying host controller and
> > its driver will detect and silence a babbling endpoint.
>
> No, they won't. That is, they will detect a babble error and return an error status, but
> they won't silence the endpoint. What makes you think they will?
Maybe there is a misunderstanding. I guess that Dave wanted to propose:
"EPROTO is a link level issue and needs to be handled by the host driver.
When the host driver detects a protocol error while processing an
URB it SHOULD complete the URB with EPROTO status and SHOULD mark the endpoint
as halted."
Is this a realistic fix for all host drivers?
-Guido
next reply other threads:[~2021-05-19 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-19 16:14 Guido Kiener [this message]
2021-05-19 17:35 ` Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [syzbot] INFO: rcu detected stall in tx Alan Stern
2021-05-19 19:38 ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-05-20 2:01 ` Alan Stern
2021-05-20 20:30 ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-05-24 15:18 ` Mathias Nyman
2021-05-24 18:55 ` Alan Stern
2021-05-24 19:23 ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-05-24 22:16 ` Mathias Nyman
2021-05-24 22:48 ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-05-19 18:04 ` Re: Re: Re: Re: " Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d673611ca53f42a3a629eb051cabc6eb@rohde-schwarz.com \
--to=guido.kiener@rohde-schwarz.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dpenkler@gmail.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=syzbot+e2eae5639e7203360018@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).