From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1754646AbdKINE2 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 9 Nov 2017 08:04:28 -0500
Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:53615 "EHLO mout.web.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752678AbdKINE0 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 9 Nov 2017 08:04:26 -0500
Subject: Re: bq2415x_charger: Use common error handling code in
 bq2415x_timer_work()
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Pali_Roh=c3=a1r?= <pali.rohar@gmail.com>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
References: <48b34d35-8c41-d25b-0cb7-6257b37c5a44@users.sourceforge.net>
 <20171109120842.GA28552@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <d680ca7e-9806-1f39-80da-58fa7239a31c@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 14:04:19 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171109120842.GA28552@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:LgWWXedt4bjyh2dCiL6AoU/B5NjPkNvdKnwLOZukH3xEgekl8+H
 Z7hrseExGVIwe68p/AwJ+KEin0x3bVSLFuhrzV2vbIdgJuWQkah0iadqa2ma07meO2bXep9
 sOhrXaM9sYysbnITaLa4b9s11N3sl1st+eOlhrZe2fF/IwmGfQxVVwZrLJ1nGQGBbU57DIF
 SQBYd7o9jT4H7a6to9u2w==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:ON9vNYs5s7A=:tkLua2Wgp8Zf/4AYnw1loP
 zloNGXmdTQ7IHUfZbdxaRUGNc/0PwRUw7c5IZlUvILHsOnJKzgC2BiYaR3gPs6eZNrNfAPPY7
 I+Q7+7DlTOxSTLBsdSAOK3whVfWOHrq4iPrZUBhm1LQyk6LMM2eF7nVAxPRW7+Xy81ZERjX8j
 QKHpVL2Y394BrEyBqLcSY78VELUlfmIpLoJZdrDulGlKGrY3j9LbMHwgO8H7gZkJFH4I032p1
 S0+KhLMQeDJ9qTtYPctR0MXCAr8BIPZrX6PCoEfOgVg3/hYfDHKaIloPWgRkNuCmLMu7hsh2m
 ZBPX/UXAgJqWDCwjIbxD8zC15Ohb2QVxtfzHQRgHQWp94W5UhoCqsv1I3puNMhBgq5+84rzGv
 eg6whpP6Qu7BGmjvOKh6wxX7TnJnAWmrgCl341trktEPZFjfzJKWsWf4ZhG1qTm+OZcZQNliA
 ip8Cu+OqT9JOZa8vdwWXvI1SYHV/R5iUSCdc2J3WXg6eIdXhydIjfm3B4Is0IO+YvbTqxXk1S
 8hjohm3iCIf3yPK8qXQ0WoObnc+3JZKV0TsgA12Z0T7+bdSGoSZuLAjtn16TOsPQ8NjtbgFC8
 cdztm8MBEag+JGTXR7HNkK88aX77R1XOvDjXOKowfu4kAb84UuE6NAXleiGG4uz2DMbHG45TL
 yWqVFZNdxGKH2qbCTSuGi9UVpvVU6Egdg15/gJShmD2eN22oIyLdIyENOmsMAXQR+YB4ZpBzo
 SC2ZdmA0IfNzpwQJWAABacIBPryFDPP6jFGcNViqyp7xdYTFzcghbxO/XHDuYrQDHbcM32UMM
 9TUQWxxT47xnrfu1sN7JdXE//5MtsjRxWN8jiVDTr1saRVL0IY=
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Better fix would be to display separate messages; user is probably
> interested in what failed...

Which information (or wording) would you find more appropriate
at these places?

Regards,
Markus