linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/9] pinctrl: sunxi: Deal with configless pins
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:46:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d707c657502b87a7f8e70c7b44492bc95939f9f6.1476200742.git-series.maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.7edc6c25be8a5e2efdda6a82e102dbf7ece6aa64.1476200742.git-series.maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.7edc6c25be8a5e2efdda6a82e102dbf7ece6aa64.1476200742.git-series.maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>

Even though the our binding had the assumption that the allwinner,pull and
allwinner,drive properties were optional, the code never took that into
account.

Fix that.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
index 6f6f1e0011e2..2ee8d48ed5d3 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
@@ -218,20 +218,29 @@ static unsigned long *sunxi_pctrl_build_pin_config(struct device_node *node,
 {
 	unsigned long *pinconfig;
 	unsigned int configlen = 0, idx = 0;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (sunxi_pctrl_has_drive_prop(node))
 		configlen++;
 	if (sunxi_pctrl_has_bias_prop(node))
 		configlen++;
 
+	/*
+	 * If we don't have any configuration, bail out
+	 */
+	if (!configlen)
+		return NULL;
+
 	pinconfig = kzalloc(configlen * sizeof(*pinconfig), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!pinconfig)
-		return NULL;
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
 	if (sunxi_pctrl_has_drive_prop(node)) {
 		int drive = sunxi_pctrl_parse_drive_prop(node);
-		if (drive < 0)
+		if (drive < 0) {
+			ret = drive;
 			goto err_free;
+		}
 
 		pinconfig[idx++] = pinconf_to_config_packed(PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH,
 							  drive);
@@ -239,8 +248,10 @@ static unsigned long *sunxi_pctrl_build_pin_config(struct device_node *node,
 
 	if (sunxi_pctrl_has_bias_prop(node)) {
 		int pull = sunxi_pctrl_parse_bias_prop(node);
-		if (pull < 0)
+		if (pull < 0) {
+			ret = pull;
 			goto err_free;
+		}
 
 		pinconfig[idx++] = pinconf_to_config_packed(pull, 0);
 	}
@@ -251,7 +262,7 @@ static unsigned long *sunxi_pctrl_build_pin_config(struct device_node *node,
 
 err_free:
 	kfree(pinconfig);
-	return NULL;
+	return ERR_PTR(ret);
 }
 
 static int sunxi_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
@@ -285,7 +296,10 @@ static int sunxi_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 
 	/*
 	 * We have two maps for each pin: one for the function, one
-	 * for the configuration (bias, strength, etc)
+	 * for the configuration (bias, strength, etc).
+	 *
+	 * We might be slightly overshooting, since we might not have
+	 * any configuration.
 	 */
 	nmaps = npins * 2;
 	*map = kmalloc(nmaps * sizeof(struct pinctrl_map), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -293,8 +307,8 @@ static int sunxi_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	pinconfig = sunxi_pctrl_build_pin_config(node, &configlen);
-	if (!pinconfig) {
-		ret = -EINVAL;
+	if (IS_ERR(pinconfig)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(pinconfig);
 		goto err_free_map;
 	}
 
@@ -321,15 +335,24 @@ static int sunxi_pctrl_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 
 		i++;
 
-		(*map)[i].type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP;
-		(*map)[i].data.configs.group_or_pin = group;
-		(*map)[i].data.configs.configs = pinconfig;
-		(*map)[i].data.configs.num_configs = configlen;
-
-		i++;
+		if (pinconfig) {
+			(*map)[i].type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP;
+			(*map)[i].data.configs.group_or_pin = group;
+			(*map)[i].data.configs.configs = pinconfig;
+			(*map)[i].data.configs.num_configs = configlen;
+			i++;
+		}
 	}
 
-	*num_maps = nmaps;
+	*num_maps = i;
+
+	/*
+	 * We know have the number of maps we need, we can resize our
+	 * map array
+	 */
+	*map = krealloc(*map, i * sizeof(struct pinctrl_map), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!map)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	return 0;
 
@@ -342,6 +365,8 @@ static void sunxi_pctrl_dt_free_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 				    struct pinctrl_map *map,
 				    unsigned num_maps)
 {
+	unsigned long *pinconfig;
+
 	/* All the maps have the same pin config, free only the first one */
 	kfree(map[0].data.configs.configs);
 	kfree(map);
-- 
git-series 0.8.10

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-11 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-11 15:45 [PATCH v2 0/9] pinctrl: sunxi: Generic bindings rework Maxime Ripard
2016-10-11 15:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] pinctrl: sunxi: Rework the pin config building code Maxime Ripard
2016-10-20 12:47   ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-11 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] pinctrl: sunxi: Use macros from bindings header file for DT parsing Maxime Ripard
2016-10-20 12:50   ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-11 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] pinctrl: sunxi: Handle bias disable Maxime Ripard
2016-10-20 12:51   ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-11 15:46 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2016-10-18  7:47   ` [PATCH v2 4/9] pinctrl: sunxi: Deal with configless pins Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-10-19 12:16     ` Maxime Ripard
2016-10-20 12:52       ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-20 13:46         ` Maxime Ripard
2016-10-11 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] pinctrl: sunxi: Support generic binding Maxime Ripard
2016-10-11 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl bindings Maxime Ripard
2016-10-18  7:37   ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-10-18 12:43   ` Rob Herring
2016-10-11 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] ARM: sunxi: Remove useless allwinner,drive property Maxime Ripard
2016-10-18  7:38   ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-10-20 12:55   ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-11 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] ARM: sunxi: Remove useless allwinner,pull property Maxime Ripard
2016-10-18  7:39   ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-10-20 12:57   ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-11 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] ARM: sunxi: Convert pinctrl nodes to generic bindings Maxime Ripard
2016-10-18  7:43   ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2017-01-04  2:16     ` André Przywara
2017-01-05 15:35       ` Maxime Ripard
2017-01-06  1:17         ` André Przywara
2017-01-09 11:16           ` Maxime Ripard
2017-01-11 14:41             ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-20 13:01   ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d707c657502b87a7f8e70c7b44492bc95939f9f6.1476200742.git-series.maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).