linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] nubus: Simplify check in remove callback
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 19:50:39 +1000 (AEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d74ccd1-116d-9450-5ee4-8d5074998872@linux-m68k.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210727080840.3550927-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1187 bytes --]

On Tue, 27 Jul 2021, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

> The driver core only calls a remove callback when the device was
> successfully bound (aka probed) before. So dev->driver is never NULL.
> 

Are you sure dev->driver is non-NULL for the lifetime of the device?
A quick glance at device_reprobe() makes me wonder about that.

> Apart from that, the compiler might already assume dev->driver being
> non-NULL after to_nubus_driver(dev->driver) was called.
> 

I don't understand how a compiler can make that assumption. But then, I 
don't know why compilers do a lot of the things they do...

> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/nubus/bus.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nubus/bus.c b/drivers/nubus/bus.c
> index d9d04f27f89b..17fad660032c 100644
> --- a/drivers/nubus/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/nubus/bus.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static void nubus_device_remove(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct nubus_driver *ndrv = to_nubus_driver(dev->driver);
>  
> -	if (dev->driver && ndrv->remove)
> +	if (ndrv->remove)
>  		ndrv->remove(to_nubus_board(dev));
>  }
>  
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-27  9:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-27  8:08 [PATCH 0/5] Some cleanups after making bus_type::remove return void Uwe Kleine-König
2021-07-27  8:08 ` [PATCH 1/5] nubus: Simplify check in remove callback Uwe Kleine-König
2021-07-27  9:50   ` Finn Thain [this message]
2021-07-27 10:07     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-07-27 10:19       ` Finn Thain
2021-07-27 11:42     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-07-31 10:32       ` Finn Thain
2021-07-31 12:05         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-07-27  8:08 ` [PATCH 2/5] nubus: Make struct nubus_driver::remove return void Uwe Kleine-König
2021-07-27  9:47   ` Finn Thain
2021-07-27  8:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] sh: superhyway: Simplify check in remove callback Uwe Kleine-König
2021-07-27  8:08 ` [PATCH 4/5] zorro: Simplify " Uwe Kleine-König
2021-07-27  8:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] zorro: Drop useless (and hardly used) .driver member in struct zorro_dev Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d74ccd1-116d-9450-5ee4-8d5074998872@linux-m68k.org \
    --to=fthain@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).