From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrei Grigore <andrei.grg@gmail.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Jayme Howard <g.prime@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: pci-stub: accept exceptions to the ID- and class-based matching
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 21:40:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d777a8f1-4936-eb65-e392-c815bdf6d7e9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fdce64d5-1610-5d68-81c2-58ed61c398f4@redhat.com>
On 10/25/16 21:24, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 10/25/16 20:42, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> FWIW, I think the reason
>> this hasn't been done to date is that PCI bus addresses (except for
>> root bus devices) are not stable. Depending on the system, the address
>> of a given device may change, not only based on the slot where the
>> device is installed, but whether other devices in other slots are
>> populated.
>
> I agree.
>
> However, while the addresses are not stable in the face of hardware
> changes, I think the addresses don't change haphazardly (that is,
> without hardware changes).
>
> So, if you plug in another card, your current pci-stub.except=...
> parameter might become invalid; but that's not very different from the
> case when you plug in the second instance of a preexistent card right
> now -- then the pci-stub.ids=... filter won't match uniquely anymore,
> and assignment vs. host-side use might not work as intented.
Sorry about the self-followup; I just wanted to add -- although it might
not carry a lot of weight for the host kernel -- that the libvirt domain
XML hard-codes the host-side PCI BDF anyway, for assigned devices:
http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsHostDev
"""
<devices>
<hostdev mode='subsystem' type='pci' managed='yes'>
<source>
<address domain='0x0000' bus='0x06' slot='0x02' function='0x0'/>
</source>
...
</hostdev>
</devices>
...
source
The source element describes the device as seen from the host using
the following mechanism to describe:
...
pci
PCI devices can only be described by their address.
"""
Thanks
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-25 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-25 18:24 [PATCH] PCI: pci-stub: accept exceptions to the ID- and class-based matching Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-25 18:42 ` Alex Williamson
2016-10-25 19:24 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-25 19:40 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2016-11-07 16:49 ` Alex Williamson
2016-11-07 17:45 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-11-02 23:45 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d777a8f1-4936-eb65-e392-c815bdf6d7e9@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=andrei.grg@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=g.prime@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).