From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C386C2BA83 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 08:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBDE222C2 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 08:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728841AbgBNIHj (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 03:07:39 -0500 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.62]:38128 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725897AbgBNIHj (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 03:07:39 -0500 Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1j2W0W-00B5oY-In; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 09:07:28 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] UML: add support for KASAN under x86_64 From: Johannes Berg To: Patricia Alfonso Cc: Jeff Dike , Richard Weinberger , anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com, Andrey Ryabinin , Dmitry Vyukov , David Gow , Brendan Higgins , kasan-dev , LKML , linux-um@lists.infradead.org Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 09:07:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20200214_015457_457274_397896E3) References: <20200210225806.249297-1-trishalfonso@google.com> <13b0ea0caff576e7944e4f9b91560bf46ac9caf0.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20200214_015457_457274_397896E3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 (3.34.2-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 16:54 -0800, Patricia Alfonso wrote: > Okay, so I'll rebase onto (1) and just add the lines I need from the > [DEMO]. Are you sure you don't want to be named as a co-developed-by > at least? Yeah ... it's like 3 lines of code? Don't worry about it :) > Yeah, failing loudly does seem to be the best option here. I just ran into that with userspace ASAN yesterday for some reason, so yeah. Perhaps good to tell people what to do - I couldn't actually solve the issue I had in userspace yesterday. Here, could tell people to check the address where it's mapped, or so? johannes