From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755089AbeD3UsU (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2018 16:48:20 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:53050 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754871AbeD3UsT (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2018 16:48:19 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 7394D60271 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=okaya@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: pciehp 0000:00:1c.0:pcie004: Timeout on hotplug command 0x1038 (issued 65284 msec ago) To: Paul Menzel Cc: Dave Young , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lukas Wunner , Eric Biederman , Bjorn Helgaas , Vivek Goyal References: <8770820b-85a0-172b-7230-3a44524e6c9f@molgen.mpg.de> <20180427192207.GG8199@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <20180427211255.GI8199@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <20180428005620.GB1675@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20180428011845.GC1675@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <3ebc908fb196168bf0373875ffc5679e@codeaurora.org> From: Sinan Kaya Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 16:48:15 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3ebc908fb196168bf0373875ffc5679e@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Bjorn, On 4/28/2018 9:03 AM, okaya@codeaurora.org wrote: >> Hmm, if it is the remove() method then kexec does not use it.  kexec use >> the shutdown() method instead.  I missed this details when I replied. > > Portdrv hooks up remove handler to shutdown. That's why remove is getting called. What should we do about this? Since there is an actual HW errata involved, should we quirk this root port and not wait as if remove/shutdown doesn't exist? Paul, You might want to file a bugzilla so that we can keep our debug efforts out of this list. Sinan -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.