From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0B8C432BE for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 22:05:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43F161163 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 22:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231866AbhHTWF4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2021 18:05:56 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:6966 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229760AbhHTWFy (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2021 18:05:54 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 17KM36vU020067; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 18:05:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=1jDSUQxNlTGDTmW7UWd2Q1bW7p+I3Mrp3uwRF36kqog=; b=bhP+G/98G011ugeMxSlB8mc6Yp5fG6kYZKvqD5UMtGcsTfwTFGhgyeyFLepoez/nytAl I2SJIotLqO77vhBk25KO0e+6XWFCkkYomuHhQ8ER31rdNxqDpyaF9KH28D89Wfw5IaxE qf2QDOcnVKABx0g/K/HhNCPQBrbi6BnRQGhMIr5dxsR86kluD32eBjhEhrJ8NIOxn3DT prm5pjjX4ejvbd2pEUZczssn3lvWKWt0GUgdX1IOsvRN3S/+bClxdlv6WXmzqdlZz5dY o2pLSIJ4haemzmUbsYxqH2GG8gWVEle3OIkFGIUM29BMSaYUj2N/H/QSpvUT1BuNxJdh BQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3aj04u543m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 20 Aug 2021 18:05:13 -0400 Received: from m0098420.ppops.net (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 17KM5C6d034490; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 18:05:12 -0400 Received: from ppma02wdc.us.ibm.com (aa.5b.37a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.55.91.170]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3aj04u5433-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 20 Aug 2021 18:05:12 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 17KM2g0x006155; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 22:05:12 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.18]) by ppma02wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3ae5fgfy99-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 20 Aug 2021 22:05:12 +0000 Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.233]) by b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 17KM5A3s11862496 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 20 Aug 2021 22:05:10 GMT Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF8C136071; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 22:05:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E113136051; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 22:05:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cpe-172-100-181-211.stny.res.rr.com (unknown [9.160.182.229]) by b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 22:05:09 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] s390/vfio-ap: r/w lock for PQAP interception handler function pointer To: Jason Gunthorpe , Alex Williamson Cc: Christian Borntraeger , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.ibm.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, david@redhat.com References: <20210719193503.793910-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <20210719193503.793910-2-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <1a9f15d7-0f4d-00a0-0a8b-f1c08aa52eeb@de.ibm.com> <358b1052-c751-7417-1263-308b133325b6@linux.ibm.com> <20210819115433.76153ae4.alex.williamson@redhat.com> <20210819175807.GC1721383@nvidia.com> From: Tony Krowiak Message-ID: Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 18:05:08 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 In-Reply-To: <20210819175807.GC1721383@nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: X9JEMAHYwhavx6CVqYp4Q58WnelX7ke7 X-Proofpoint-GUID: wfD9yNj887O8DlV17NjrCiaZZ2ADSWf2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391,18.0.790 definitions=2021-08-20_08:2021-08-20,2021-08-20 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2107140000 definitions=main-2108200125 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/19/21 1:58 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:54:33AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > >> Nope. The only requests for merges through my tree that I'm aware of >> were [1] and what I understand was the evolution of that here now [2]. >> Maybe you're thinking of [3], which I do see in mainline where this was >> 2/2 in that series but afaict only patch 1/2 was committed. I guess >> that explains why there was no respin based on comments for this patch. >> Thanks, > Tony, > > If you take Alex's tree from here: > > https://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio/commits/next I navigated to this URL and clicked the green 'Code' button. I was given the option to download the zip file or use git to checkout the code at the URL displayed 'https://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio.git'. I cloned the repo at that URL and the code was definitely not in any way similar to my code base. In particular, the arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h file did not have any of the crypto structures. I then downloaded the zip file and expanded it. The code looked legitimate, but this was not a git repository, so I had no way to cherry-pick my patches nor format patches to post to this mailing list. Next, I tried cloning from 'https://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio-next.git', but I was prompted for uid/pw. So, the question is, how to I get the linux-vfio-next repo upon which I can rebase my patches? I apologize for my ignorance. > > And rebase + repost exactly the patches you need applied it would be > helpful. > > Jason