linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Rachit Agarwal <rach4x0r@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	Jaehyun Hwang <jaehyun.hwang@cornell.edu>,
	Qizhe Cai <qc228@cornell.edu>,
	Midhul Vuppalapati <mvv25@cornell.edu>,
	Rachit Agarwal <ragarwal@cs.cornell.edu>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@lightbitslabs.com>,
	Rachit Agarwal <ragarwal@cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iosched: Add i10 I/O Scheduler
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 12:34:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <da0c7aea-d917-4f3a-5136-89c30d12ba1f@grimberg.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a954c4e-aa84-834d-7d04-0ce3545d45c9@kernel.dk>


> I haven't taken a close look at the code yet so far, but one quick note
> that patches like this should be against the branches for 5.11. In fact,
> this one doesn't even compile against current -git, as
> blk_mq_bio_list_merge is now called blk_bio_list_merge.

Ugh, I guess that Jaehyun had this patch bottled up and didn't rebase
before submitting.. Sorry about that.

> In any case, I did run this through some quick peak testing as I was
> curious, and I'm seeing about 20% drop in peak IOPS over none running
> this. Perf diff:
> 
>      10.71%     -2.44%  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] read_tsc
>       2.33%     -1.99%  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] _raw_spin_lock

You ran this with nvme? or null_blk? I guess neither would benefit
from this because if the underlying device will not benefit from
batching (at least enough for the extra cost of accounting for it) it
will be counter productive to use this scheduler.

> Also:
> 
>> [5] https://github.com/i10-kernel/upstream-linux/blob/master/dss-evaluation.pdf
> 
> Was curious and wanted to look it up, but it doesn't exist.

I think this is the right one:
https://github.com/i10-kernel/upstream-linux/blob/master/i10-evaluation.pdf

We had some back and forth around the naming, hence this was probably
omitted.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-13 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-12 14:07 [PATCH] iosched: Add i10 I/O Scheduler Rachit Agarwal
2020-11-12 18:02 ` Jens Axboe
2020-11-13 20:34   ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2020-11-13 21:03     ` Jens Axboe
2020-11-13 21:23       ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-11-13 21:26         ` Jens Axboe
2020-11-13 21:36           ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-11-13 21:44             ` Jens Axboe
2020-11-13 21:56               ` Sagi Grimberg
     [not found]                 ` <CAKeUqKKHg1wD19pnwJEd8whubnuGVic_ZhDjebaq3kKmY9TtsQ@mail.gmail.com>
2020-11-30 19:20                   ` Sagi Grimberg
     [not found]                   ` <CAKeUqKK3yykq8LNv1CCHZTHSz1=bzBaCwVQmi6bhpbYzqVJsqQ@mail.gmail.com>
2021-01-11 18:15                     ` Rachit Agarwal
2020-11-16  8:41             ` Ming Lei
2020-11-13 14:59 ` Ming Lei
2020-11-13 20:58   ` Sagi Grimberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=da0c7aea-d917-4f3a-5136-89c30d12ba1f@grimberg.me \
    --to=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jaehyun.hwang@cornell.edu \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=mvv25@cornell.edu \
    --cc=qc228@cornell.edu \
    --cc=rach4x0r@gmail.com \
    --cc=ragarwal@cornell.edu \
    --cc=ragarwal@cs.cornell.edu \
    --cc=sagi@lightbitslabs.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).