From: Kari Argillander <email@example.com> To: Linus Torvalds <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Konstantin Komarov <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org Cc: Theodore Ts'o <email@example.com>, Christoph Hellwig <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Matthew Wilcox <email@example.com>, Eric Biggers <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "Darrick J. Wong" <email@example.com>, Christian Brauner <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Al Viro <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com Subject: NTFS3 driver is orphan already. What we do? Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 12:22:02 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (raw) After ntfs3 got merged and 5.15 got released ntfs3 maintainer has kept total radio silence. I have tried to contact him with personal mails with no luck. I have chosen bunch of people to discuss what we should do this driver as this is already orphan. Feel free to add more if you think it is necessary. There is lot of bug reports which are ignored completely. Lot of patches which nobody applies. He did some work after 5.15, but has not send PR for those . I did also ask to use fix and next branches seperetly and tag stable fixes, but he did not do that eater. I think Konstantin did not yet quite understand meaning of stable, next and upstream and it is not ok to applied every patch to same tree for any point. Personally I did my best try to help Konstantin with maintainer things, but I have to say that it was quite difficult as he mostly ignored emails and do many things like he wanted. He did not suggest anything to anyone if someone send patch. He just applied those or ignored. Also sometimes he just applied own patch without sending it to review process. Of course new maintainer needs time to learn things but just wanted to say these so everyone knows how things went so far. I also did suggest that I could co maintain this driver to take burden from Konstantin, but haven't got any replay. I have worker towards better CI system for myself for ntfs3 which of course will be public in some point if we solve current situations. If we keep this driver we really need very good fstests support. But we also do not have very good open source utilyes for ntfs. Konstantin said that he will open source those as well, but here we are waiting and we will probably have to wait long time. Now is time to think what we should do. Should ntfs3 just be removed? As I really wanted to see that ntfs3 will be big thing I have to say that I vote for removing unless someone comes to rescue this catastrophe. Yes we break userspace, but we might break it silently if nobody is maintaining this. I also do not believe that if someone is just accepting patches that it is enough. Ntfs3 is not so ready that we do not need some ntfs specialist to maintain it imo. Really public CI might save something if we keep this in and I will work towards that if we choose to keep this in. And if Konstantin read this please come and join this conversation. Argillander : https://github.com/Paragon-Software-Group/linux-ntfs3/commits/devel
next reply other threads:[~2022-04-26 9:59 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-04-26 9:22 Kari Argillander [this message] 2022-04-27 17:47 ` Linus Torvalds 2022-04-28 0:47 ` Namjae Jeon 2022-04-29 16:45 ` Kari Argillander 2022-04-29 19:59 ` David Sterba 2022-04-28 9:38 ` Leonidas-Panagiotis Papadakos 2022-05-01 17:13 ` Konstantin Komarov 2022-05-02 20:49 ` Kari Argillander
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --subject='Re: NTFS3 driver is orphan already. What we do?' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).