From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751365AbeBWIUZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2018 03:20:25 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:54007 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750796AbeBWIUX (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2018 03:20:23 -0500 Subject: Re: [0/8] target-iSCSI: Adjustments for several function implementations To: David Disseldorp , target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Al Viro , Arun Easi , Bart Van Assche , Dan Carpenter , Hannes Reinecke , Ingo Molnar , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Jiang Yi , Kees Cook , "Nicholas A. Bellinger" , Russell King , Tang Wenji , "Theodore Ts'o" , Varun Prakash References: <6163538d-a406-2f60-11a2-88b4694e9975@users.sourceforge.net> <20180222143624.7c7241a1@suse.de> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 09:19:28 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180222143624.7c7241a1@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:fiF+imzW7k2hsrNuYjkYKkKHg0/fXC3HcTK7ClQnkS32TuHs/qx +YT0wZx6oLdGSArDb50r6oqpXbs9JzHdBBL82Yzwa92KnfOplFkZVzhenqBmTcS5a2gGbWZ 3beMHYmuH4sdPa9q+KD7uOWW33O//ILbX34rTNObQWHEmIBkigpuwEZsAd34k2ImhewZHFJ rWiTEcK3EO1aoWHQq3e/Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:XMWWjXyCPk4=:0VouFVvqF+EKYOXiUlo/yz TNb5Q7U9NYOEFWL534Qf3DbuRa3mIgZmmm4WIJ08oX0C2m8XTt26FQ8Z1lmM2LyYyoe8NNWos 7c8Q9Xxxl/hgkLjaB/q5C2CoYCVIzzYIwyRkJpRZVLovoEXSXEWSHAvym/MbUkOoFdRsGKyb3 6WGz7u+/xWKzM0BPALEUQdPpBx/QJxLlcG6Vj348Za1FdI/RNMAlHheRO0SdrWhvmt+KOuw5e 9+/8UwIW+PoAiHUEeNJXnaxL76+1TgGQZwKTIROvCoz+AzMjy+vONpWpK4fvLTXRGyYb5nwvT 95jMhdf+Uyva3RS/UWeTLUri3XEO7YKuy5pOn+ABe1qcppF/UrK2JMMMPLlUChl5QL9WjcZH8 FCkQjqerN04BA3XCRy0aBZVVPsPCwfmZHnVuzLdDTUEKzp+bP0ufvi2kDImV1XYHLBerwqqld fP6HazE5Z89M5fvO45YkcrJ7Sw0AyhlkznydyKOihj9jqUkcleCmmyas5WeErUaoLHhJvAO6A NKdG0WtmmONhfrG8K6HQcaHofrWKstCVN+9/HTuUz1gAKX7mUbzjSS35bKvlc1fIpVwm/MDSn EKS+T/XOSrcycEJUu7Yf+R9tJCmvaQoW4f0uCAei4GOWfMI9oIKJZnVCKyzoNiJhBtL6GdREr LC1dlCwSgSsim6FxGtF0N+I4I05vD9FmU42EqFb5SA2ysdpHmMjY6ZjuZfo6UXeCHEC8ViGKq +AVY4vduAMuG3R/w7N/9dEGr9JHT+DukMinQijwOJrVlp0kTriluMOTsLauKonwOI6O5Umv8W Bn1526MKJ93/J+Di9awyDQBdyTuKPzeaJKvDMjt8bdqYKAewH8= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > You're 1/8 patch had an actual bug fix hidden amongst the style churn. It showed the general possibility to adjust the source code structure for the function “chap_server_compute_md5” also because of the usage of the single jump label “out” before. > I don't see any such fixes in the other patches. This view is appropriate. Further update steps show different transformation possibilities. > My opinion from https://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg16342.html > hasn't changed. FWIW, I'd prefer to see LIO adopt a policy similar to: > https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Developer%27s_FAQ#How_not_to_start It seems that you express a few aspects for general change resistance. Will the circumstances evolve for similar software improvements? Regards, Markus