From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41766C47082 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 11:12:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282916101A for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 11:12:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231192AbhFGLN7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2021 07:13:59 -0400 Received: from polaris.svanheule.net ([84.16.241.116]:52038 "EHLO polaris.svanheule.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230483AbhFGLN5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2021 07:13:57 -0400 Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a03f:eafb:ee01:5442:57ed:f9a9:776c] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a03f:eafb:ee01:5442:57ed:f9a9:776c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sander@svanheule.net) by polaris.svanheule.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1902620A046; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 13:12:05 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=svanheule.net; s=mail1707; t=1623064325; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Nou6XjvAP38z4oa5xkvNMCbPRj0XuGTO8MSmyHC9tbc=; b=0CIoEbe2bjZp82XEL2fS56nGsET1uLod8YzG5YO6MH6rOoKDRibNF35DdqRDvjdrz8/smt 5d4T8f8Yd+jn52iB/jnctD7u5euvKtAh/6eTbib4amAWiV9PvPvDB07KA4xA2zXLh+SqrB /Vbu7O+33wHHBK8dL8Kgv3h0PmRO4kDh7bn/eiayXis+gWI6xrKZUxS+B9jhzfVLvMcAyH J1iWydBTq5gdWD3dELSGbXAJlUZdXf3ht/1kmVtu8xH3QxsHUCgMQ7R54/cBvmZeJF2Sxw B61wEY8AJUdm1xt4EvDaAdSyoJwSdwVFgCOzmxIfwxawqVPp5tF2SNa7oJq4Wg== Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: mdio: Reject invalid clause-22 addresses From: Sander Vanheule To: Mark Brown Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko , Andrew Lunn Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 13:12:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210607110355.GA5705@sirena.org.uk> References: <20210605083116.12786-1-sander@svanheule.net> <20210607110355.GA5705@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.4 (3.38.4-1.fc33) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 12:03 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 10:31:18AM +0200, Sander Vanheule wrote: > > Currently a regmap configuration for regmap-mdio must have a register > > address width of 5 bits (cf. clause-22 register access). This is not > > enforced on the provided register addresses, which would enable > > clause-45 MDIO bus access, if the right bit packing is used. > > Please don't send new patches in reply to old patch serieses, it makes > it hard to follow what's going on and what the current state of things > is and makes it easy for things to get missed when threads get cleaned > out. Sorry, my bad. I usually have an updated cover letter in between updated patches, but this was only one patch. I'll include a LKML-link to the previous version(s) in the future, to keep an easy reference around. Best, Sander