From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10D3C282C2 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 15:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7572175B for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 15:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="mYCdFYT6" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726733AbfBGPYe (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:24:34 -0500 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]:39628 "EHLO lelv0143.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726037AbfBGPYd (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:24:33 -0500 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x17FOFnn036811; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 09:24:15 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1549553055; bh=VxHe9q3vwv6tCQ2mheOwbxRx0o6X/EcDJo/tFyBHw3w=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=mYCdFYT6TXnKHRPj3KhiF+O7kU1wMljtsGGjU9dcWCzqeobjyZRsV9To3NXEyugqN ynTZWgdvp/L0XQlB31PwK6lya+n9H65EiLkKa+blcVdi27A3uIkgfmmyHAHyvLH8xC FJ86864WtYx1rlbE/Kf0p04bvafFaJm9KpVd9bcU= Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (dfle114.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.35]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x17FOFn5066269 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 7 Feb 2019 09:24:15 -0600 Received: from DFLE112.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.33) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 09:24:15 -0600 Received: from dflp32.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.15) by DFLE112.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1591.10 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 09:24:15 -0600 Received: from [172.24.190.172] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x17FOCrb032767; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 09:24:13 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/35] ARM: davinci: modernize the irq support To: Bartosz Golaszewski , Kevin Hilman , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Marc Zyngier CC: , , Bartosz Golaszewski References: <20190131133928.17985-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> From: Sekhar Nori Message-ID: Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 20:54:12 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190131133928.17985-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Bartosz, On 31/01/19 7:08 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > This series ports the davinci platform to using SPARSE_IRQ, cleans up > the irqchip drivers and moves them over to drivers/irqchip. > > The series can be logically split into four parts. The first (1-8) aims > at introducing support for SPARSE_IRQ. It contains a couple changes > required for that functionality and the final patch actually selecting > it. > > Second part (9-18) makes the aintc driver suitable for drivers/irqchip > and eventually moves it over there. > > Part 3 (19-31) does the same for the cp-intc driver. > > Last part (32-35) aims at removing mach/irqs.h as it's no longer needed > with SPARSE_IRQ selected. > > The series has been tested on da850-lcdk (for cp-intc) and > dm365-evm (for aintc). Looks good to me overall, apart from some comments on individual patches. I boot tested on all 6 DaVinci SoCs. Also did a basic iperf test on DA850 to check that performance remains same as before. Nice work! Thanks, Sekhar