From: Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@shopee.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: longman@redhat.com, lizefan.x@bytedance.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Clean up cpuset_task_status_allowed
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 10:53:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <db6284ba-b936-b38c-662d-3189c14596e7@shopee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y4TqvlOmXqY/CBEc@slm.duckdns.org>
On 2022/11/29 01:07, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 07:51:33AM +0000, haifeng.xu wrote:
>> cpuset_task_status_allowed just shows mems_allowed status, so
>> rename it to task_mems_allowed. Moreover, it's only used in
>> proc_pid_status, so move it to fs/proc/array.c. There is no
>> intentional function change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: haifeng.xu <haifeng.xu@shopee.com>
>
> mems_allowed being a very much cpuset feature, I don't see how this is an
> improvement. The new code is different and can be another way of doing it,
> sure, but there's no inherent benefit to it. What's the point of the churn?
>
> Thanks.
>
Hi, tejun.
In proc_pid_status, task_cpus_allowed is used to show cpus_allowed, similar to that,
task_mems_allowed is more specific to show mems_allowed. Also cpuset_task_status_allowed
is used to dispaly memory status in '/proc/<pid>/status' and isn't used in other files, so
keep it in the fs/proc/array.c.
Thanks,
Haifeng.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-29 2:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-25 7:51 [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Clean up cpuset_task_status_allowed haifeng.xu
2022-11-25 22:51 ` Waiman Long
2022-11-28 17:07 ` Tejun Heo
2022-11-29 2:53 ` Haifeng Xu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=db6284ba-b936-b38c-662d-3189c14596e7@shopee.com \
--to=haifeng.xu@shopee.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).