From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 -next] Input: gpio_keys: set input direction explicitly for gpio keys
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:48:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <db85d594-5601-5da6-8247-b1f5b186ae0a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161117011836.GB8133@dtor-ws>
On 17/11/16 01:18, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:38:22PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Commit 700a38b27eef ("Input: gpio_keys - switch to using generic device
>> properties") switched to use generic device properties for GPIO keys and
>> commit 5feeca3c1e39 ("Input: gpio_keys - add support for GPIO descriptors")
>> switched from legacy GPIO numbers to GPIO descriptors.
>>
>> Previously devm_gpio_request_one was explicitly passed GPIOF_DIR_IN flag
>> to set the GPIO direction as input. However devm_get_gpiod_from_child
>> doesn't have such provisions and hence fwnode_get_named_gpiod can't set
>> it as input.
>>
>> This breaks few platforms with the following error:
>> " gpiochip_lock_as_irq: tried to flag a GPIO set as output for IRQ
>> unable to lock HW IRQ <n> for IRQ
>> genirq: Failed to request resources for POWER (irq <x>) on irqchip
>> gpio_keys: Unable to claim irq <x>; error -22
>> gpio-keys: probe failed with error -22 "
>>
>> This patch fixes the issue by setting input direction explicitly for
>> gpio input keys. It also remove the existing GPIOF_DIR_IN flag setting
>> for the legacy gpios and merges into single gpiod_direction_input call.
>>
>> Fixes: 700a38b27eef ("Input: gpio_keys - switch to using generic device properties")
>> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c | 10 +++++++++-
>> drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c | 10 +++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> v2->v3:
>> - Added error handling and error message
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
>> index 5576f2ae0b71..ed38a05b3039 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
>> @@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static int gpio_keys_setup_key(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> * Legacy GPIO number, so request the GPIO here and
>> * convert it to descriptor.
>> */
>> - unsigned flags = GPIOF_IN;
>> + unsigned flags = 0;
>>
>> if (button->active_low)
>> flags |= GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW;
>
> Sudeep, I looked into this aa bit deeper, and I have issue with this
> part: in absence of GPIOF_IN devm_gpio_request_one() will attempt to
> configure GPIO line as output, which may not work. Because of this I
> think we should move gpiod_direction_input() call into the "modern"
> branch and leave legacy branch as is.
>
> Does the version below work for you?
>
Yes it does and in fact I started with something similar and then saw
that I can make it common between legacy and new branch conditions. So I
am fine with the modified version you sent.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-17 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-16 11:54 [PATCH -next] Input: gpio_keys: set input direction explicitly for gpio keys Sudeep Holla
2016-11-16 12:43 ` kbuild test robot
2016-11-16 12:48 ` kbuild test robot
2016-11-16 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 " Sudeep Holla
2016-11-16 17:36 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-11-16 17:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-11-16 18:34 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-11-16 18:39 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-11-16 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 " Sudeep Holla
2016-11-17 1:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-11-17 9:48 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=db85d594-5601-5da6-8247-b1f5b186ae0a@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).