linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix rhashtable bit-locking for m68k
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 11:08:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <db89e10c-44ba-117d-2fe3-e01eb733d29a@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <155503371949.17793.8266195008003399968.stgit@noble.brown>

On 4/11/19 6:52 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> As reported by Guenter Roeck, the new rhashtable bit-locking
> doesn't work on m68k as it only requires 2-byte alignment, so BIT(1)
> is addresses is not unused.
> 
> We current use BIT(0) to identify a NULLS marker, but that is only
> needed in ->next pointers.  The bucket head does not need a NULLS
> marker, so the lsb there can be used for locking.
> 
> the first 4 patches make some small improvements and re-arrange some
> code.  The final patch converts to using only BIT(0) for these two
> different special purposes.
> 
> I had previously suggested dropping the series until I fix it.  Given
> that this was fairly easy, I retract that I think it best simply to
> add these patches to fix the code.
> 
For the series:

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Tested with the series applied on top of next-20190412, running all
345 qemu tests. No boot failures or new warnings observed.

Guenter

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-12 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-12  1:52 NeilBrown
2019-04-12  1:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] rhashtable: fix some __rcu annotation errors NeilBrown
2019-04-12  1:52 ` [PATCH 5/5] rhashtable: use BIT(0) for locking NeilBrown
2019-04-12  1:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] rhashtable: reorder some inline functions and macros NeilBrown
2019-05-14 19:25   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-04-12  1:52 ` [PATCH 4/5] rhashtable: replace rht_ptr_locked() with rht_assign_locked() NeilBrown
2019-04-12  1:52 ` [PATCH 3/5] rhashtable: move dereference inside rht_ptr() NeilBrown
2019-04-12 18:08 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2019-04-13  0:34   ` [PATCH 0/5] Fix rhashtable bit-locking for m68k David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=db89e10c-44ba-117d-2fe3-e01eb733d29a@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix rhashtable bit-locking for m68k' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).