From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752262AbdARANz (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 19:13:55 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f67.google.com ([74.125.83.67]:35457 "EHLO mail-pg0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751933AbdARANy (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 19:13:54 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 05/10] drivers: base: Add device_find_in_class_name() To: Andy Shevchenko References: <20170117232152.1661-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <20170117232152.1661-6-f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: netdev , Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Gregory Clement , Russell King , Vivien Didelot , "David S. Miller" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "moderated list:ARM/Marvell Dove/MV78xx0/Orion SOC support" , open list From: Florian Fainelli Message-ID: Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:13:11 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/17/2017 04:07 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> On 01/17/2017 04:00 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>>> On 01/17/2017 03:34 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >>> But why not to use void *class_name to be consistent with callback and >>> device_find_child()? >> >> The top-level function: device_find_in_class_name() should have a >> stronger typing of its argument even if it internally uses >> device_find_child() and a callback that takes a void * argument, that's >> how I see it. > > Fair enough. > >>> Btw, >>> return get_device(parent); >> >> Not sure I follow what that means here? > > Missed remark. Instead of > > get_device(parent); > return parent; > > you can use > > return get_device(parent); Seems reasonable, if I have to respin a v5, will add that, thanks! -- Florian