From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Authentication-Results: smtp.codeaurora.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="gVU5VjED"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="gVU5VjED" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 49D5A6070B Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932638AbeFFJv1 (ORCPT + 25 others); Wed, 6 Jun 2018 05:51:27 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:49058 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752074AbeFFJvY (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2018 05:51:24 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org AFF1C6070B Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=sricharan@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: qcom: Introduce Hexagon V5 based WCSS driver To: Vinod Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ohad@wizery.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, andy.gross@linaro.org, david.brown@linaro.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, sibis@codeaurora.org References: <1528177361-8883-1-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> <20180605061919.GQ16230@vkoul-mobl> <3a4c102b-7228-153a-c588-b1bf00291fa8@codeaurora.org> <20180605164031.GZ16230@vkoul-mobl> <1b376fc2-6a1b-1457-ffff-332954d1bef8@codeaurora.org> <20180606064909.GC16230@vkoul-mobl> From: Sricharan R Message-ID: Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 15:21:17 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180606064909.GC16230@vkoul-mobl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Vinod, On 6/6/2018 12:19 PM, Vinod wrote: > Hi Sricharan, > > On 06-06-18, 12:09, Sricharan R wrote: > >>>>>> +config QCOM_Q6V5_WCSS >>>>>> + tristate "Qualcomm Hexagon based WCSS Peripheral Image Loader" >>>>>> + depends on OF && ARCH_QCOM >>>>>> + depends on QCOM_SMEM >>>>>> + depends on RPMSG_QCOM_SMD || (COMPILE_TEST && RPMSG_QCOM_SMD=n) >>>>>> + depends on RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM || RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=n >>>>> >>>>> Is there a reason why it depends on RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=n? What would >>>>> happen if distro wants both this and RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM >>>>> >>>> RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=n should be for the COMPILE_TEST. Probably that >>> >>> why would that be a limitation? I am more worried about >>> RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=n being the condition here. In new drivers we >>> should not typically have dependency on some symbol being not there >> >> Without that, if RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=m is compiled as a module, then >> it would break the build. > > Okay I do not know the details, but that doesn't sound correct to me. > Breaking build sounds a bit extreme to me. Can you give details on this > part.. > Having, just, depends on RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM || COMPILE_TEST, is going to break when RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=m and COMPILE_TEST=y. Hence the COMPILE_TEST && RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=n. Having said that, COMPILE_TEST is getting tested for RPMSG_QCOM_SMD=n in the previous line. So that's the reason for not having it in below line for RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM. >>>> means that it should be corrected here and for ADSP, Q6V5_PIL as well. >>>> Bjorn, is that correct ?, should it be, below ? >>>> >>>> depends on (RPMSG_QCOM_SMD || (COMPILE_TEST && RPMSG_QCOM_SMD=n)) || (RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM || (COMPILE_TEST && RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=n)) >>> >>> that doesnt really sound good :( >> >> Hmm, but i was thinking it should functionally depend on either SMD or GLINK and not both. > > If you are depedent upon a symbol provided by a module you should say > depends on. If a machine is not supposed to have both SMD or GLINK then > the driver will not get probed. > This is where, i was thinking, it should be functional if either of SMD or GLINK is there, but should not require both. Regards, Sricharan -- "QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus