linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yang Guo <guoyang2@huawei.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/buffer.c: Add checking buffer head stat before clear
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 14:12:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dbf9670a-13c8-634b-b10b-7da19c7c50be@hisilicon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210205154548.49dd62b161b794b9f29026f1@linux-foundation.org>

Hi Andrew,

在 2021/2/6 7:45, Andrew Morton 写道:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 14:14:50 +0800 Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com> wrote:
> 
>> From: Yang Guo <guoyang2@huawei.com>
>>
>> clear_buffer_new() is used to clear buffer new stat. When PAGE_SIZE
>> is 64K, most buffer heads in the list are not needed to clear.
>> clear_buffer_new() has an enpensive atomic modification operation,
>> Let's add checking buffer head before clear it as __block_write_begin_int
>> does which is good for performance.
> 
> Did this produce any measurable improvement?

It has been tested on Huwei Kunpeng 920 which is ARM64 platform and test commond is below:
numactl --cpunodebind=0 --membind=0 fio -name=randwrite -numjobs=16 -filename=/mnt/test1
-rw=randwrite -ioengine=libaio -direct=0 -iodepth=64 -sync=0 -norandommap -group_reporting
-runtime=60 -time_based -bs=4k -size=5G

The test result before patch:
WRITE: bw=930MiB/s (976MB/s), 930MiB/s-930MiB/s (976MB/s-976MB/s), io=54.5GiB (58.5GB),
run=60001-60001msec

The test result after patch:
WRITE: bw=958MiB/s (1005MB/s), 958MiB/s-958MiB/s (1005MB/s-1005MB/s), io=56.1GiB (60.3GB),
run=60001-60001msec

> 
> Perhaps we should give clear_buffer_x() the same optimization as
> set_buffer_x()?
> 

Good catch,
but we check it more about it, if we do it the same as set_buffer_x(),
many more codes will be fixed, such as ext4_wait_block_bitmap
it has done sanity check using buffer_new and clear_buffer_new
will check it again.

Thanks,
Shaokun

> 
> static __always_inline void set_buffer_##name(struct buffer_head *bh)	\
> {									\
> 	if (!test_bit(BH_##bit, &(bh)->b_state))			\
> 		set_bit(BH_##bit, &(bh)->b_state);			\
> }									\
> static __always_inline void clear_buffer_##name(struct buffer_head *bh)	\
> {									\
> 	clear_bit(BH_##bit, &(bh)->b_state);				\
> }									\
> 
> 
> .
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2021-02-08  6:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-03  6:14 [PATCH] fs/buffer.c: Add checking buffer head stat before clear Shaokun Zhang
2021-02-05 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2021-02-08  6:12   ` Shaokun Zhang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dbf9670a-13c8-634b-b10b-7da19c7c50be@hisilicon.com \
    --to=zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=guoyang2@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).