linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: add faccessat2 syscall
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:03:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd5d64fe-96a7-a588-52af-d75928c2a48b@samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOssrKcVddL5URQ0Vy79eQOscqTTK115Ro0Eqe8Q9kdkNJspCg@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1920 bytes --]

Am 20.04.20 um 10:58 schrieb Miklos Szeredi:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 10:23 PM Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org> wrote:
>>
>> Am 18.04.20 um 21:00 schrieb Miklos Szeredi:
>>> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 8:36 PM Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Miklos,
>>>>
>>>>> POSIX defines faccessat() as having a fourth "flags" argument, while the
>>>>> linux syscall doesn't have it.  Glibc tries to emulate AT_EACCESS and
>>>>> AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW, but AT_EACCESS emulation is broken.
>>>>>
>>>>> Add a new faccessat(2) syscall with the added flags argument and implement
>>>>> both flags.
>>>>>
>>>>> The value of AT_EACCESS is defined in glibc headers to be the same as
>>>>> AT_REMOVEDIR.  Use this value for the kernel interface as well, together
>>>>> with the explanatory comment.
>>>>
>>>> It would be nice if resolv_flags would also be passed in addition to the
>>>> at flags.
>>>> See:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-api/CAHk-=wiaL6zznNtCHKg6+MJuCqDxO=yVfms3qR9A0czjKuSSiA@mail.gmail.com/
>>>>
>>>> We should avoid expecting yet another syscall in near future.
>>>
>>> What is the objection against
>>>
>>> openat(... O_PATH)
>>> foobarat(fd, AT_EMPTY_PATH, ...)
>>
>> openat2(), foobarat(), close() are 3 syscalls vs. just one.
> 
> That's not a good argument.  We could have a million specialized
> syscalls that all do very useful things.  Except it would be a
> nightmare in terms of maintenance...
> 
> "do one thing and do it well"
> 
>> As we have the new features available, I think it would be
>> good to expose them to userspace for all new syscalls, so
>> that applications can avoid boiler plate stuff around each syscall
>> and get better performance in a world where context switches are not for
>> free.
> 
> The io-uring guys are working on that problem, AFAIK.

Ok, I'll try to workout with Jens, how to do optimizations...

metze



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-20  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-16 14:35 [PATCH] vfs: add faccessat2 syscall Miklos Szeredi
2020-04-16 14:43 ` Florian Weimer
2020-04-18 18:36 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2020-04-18 19:00   ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-04-18 20:22     ` Stefan Metzmacher
2020-04-20  8:58       ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-04-20  9:03         ` Stefan Metzmacher [this message]
2020-04-19  9:56   ` Aleksa Sarai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dd5d64fe-96a7-a588-52af-d75928c2a48b@samba.org \
    --to=metze@samba.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).