From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D36C54EBC for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 22:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232629AbjAGWvb (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2023 17:51:31 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55074 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229785AbjAGWvZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2023 17:51:25 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com (mail-wm1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::334]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A0121DDF0 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 14:51:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id c4-20020a1c3504000000b003d9e2f72093so1300027wma.1 for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2023 14:51:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fOKkQl332/KMyUkOBbDdjywetIj7rvU1Tibnhf65dW4=; b=iYL+ue72Rh5jq/13fMm/7HRI2HVfNwcbS+X+gFbahVq/Rv+VrWs3C9uBmC9IEnvPcy e1UV54eyQCBNYDcj+piiokTuXaGJwNYhYEVFdeSpQAZSTJikm2as14ajUMduyW+oQADp GAb1/Rc27dx06yFd9TBbZGuDMNNIzLULkD1wV91MZLqK5XUgsRVHAgZqrGnM4+Ttl5RE 76Qcu1w1hIcnvH2vIUWFiGFgTpUsv4vwhTlpL7Ycs3wvWLl1SqkmEJcTpyciZL5hTYYo ExTsp/Bq/VDl3gGEI+btFEoSigl/6FLRiNdrwrBLnWUwIgOCRpUVKa8/rxerfCo++3f/ atDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fOKkQl332/KMyUkOBbDdjywetIj7rvU1Tibnhf65dW4=; b=R+FKrNyqleQIgKiypwf+QSRrGyUR1R5gPrkLusza7+vK4/ZxzcANu/USSVVM5vDWEG 91jHj9UAyAFKVIjrfKcAYUO1KkxhksGpyagTGmlWIycwC9cdl+HWDWh4xSYKEWo+KeZ0 evQF5cfLrTDfRW513BqLqSG4jz9UGjrQup4e9dJLPxRrRNhlazlgZoLsvQU8nrOp7ktW 9gjAuJRkZ/KR4sgeOJiwOR336YA9dF4CydoOON4lIjo0YS8phxJxbKeuBIS3Vp+PI0wc b/4i5c6wB9qfgpm82jyz1uaENpCFyjYUwZlEJOY2IL8FHbejSt1OlGOAIMLpJhafF10J olxA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kp81O6rgZ0wf6f+joKq5FhDMS97emExqTisWwmHVE0s8mbsoDvs xEN3Suqp0HTzb/tmjnE4xgxSjA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsa0i7acT+hld5/zUZxm8h+jgNoU4o2b6B3Boir7+Bwo8FSpw0ObVN7xutAJhH9CbpBb/gdZQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c7ca:0:b0:3d3:4cbf:3a51 with SMTP id z10-20020a7bc7ca000000b003d34cbf3a51mr42474919wmk.14.1673131881801; Sat, 07 Jan 2023 14:51:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.10.46] (146725694.box.freepro.com. [130.180.211.218]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l27-20020a05600c2cdb00b003a84375d0d1sm11705997wmc.44.2023.01.07.14.51.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 07 Jan 2023 14:51:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2023 23:51:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Subject: Re: Annoying message on the console for the db845c board Content-Language: en-US To: Dmitry Baryshkov Cc: Bjorn Andersson , "agross@kernel.org" , Konrad Dybcio , Mathieu Poirier , Philipp Zabel , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <17e2d99d-31e5-b29a-e729-4f4d70b2efbc@linaro.org> <3afcb445-7a62-ced7-eb54-1b2d8a9085ce@linaro.org> From: Daniel Lezcano In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/01/2023 23:07, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: [ ... ] > I've tested the v6.2-rc1. With the firmware from linux-firmware I do > not see these message. I posted the output of savedefconfig for my > .config to https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/t4KzQ4QWSF/ > > Could you please recheck with this input? Maybe something is missing? Yes, with your config, that has been fixed Thanks! Would it make sense to ensure defconfig has the same options to run this platform ? BTW I noted a lock issue: https://pastebin.com/274Xz7Aa Thanks again for your help -- Daniel -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog